Actually, I'm just trying to understand what are these "problems" we are talking about. Afaik, if you have a problem that may only be fixed by Talad and you ask the help of a GM and the problem isn't solved because that particular GM didn't "felt the need" to report it to Talad, you can try to report the problem yourself, to Talad directly.
What I understand from this thread is that Zanzibar suggests a second leader of the GM team, and I don't really see the point of having 2 leaders.

Your responce shows why this position is needed.

Your answer is outstandingly clear. What is my "responce" showing? I was just asking some questions about what this Liaison possition means and who and how should be the person in this position since the post isn't very clear. And, of course I was pointing out that this whole thread started from a false assumption on how the GM team works.
And, btw, trust me, I doubt that if a player has a problem and submits that problem trough a petition or talks directly to a GM, that problem will go ignored.
Want to invent positions and to create beurocracy? I bet that will fix problems alot faster [yeah, this statement is ironic]
So, right now the thing works like this: I have a problem, I go to a GM, the GM ignores me [not likely but let's asume that], I go directly to Talad.
With the Liaison position, the situation will be like: I have a problem, I go to a GM, the GM ignores me [not likely, again], I go to the Liaison guy, the Liaison goes to Talad.
Besides, starting from the presumption stated in the opening of the thread, that the GM team leader, and the whole GM team are not impartial, what will be the guarantee that this Liaison person will be absolutely impartial?

Yes, so far we don't have any "melee" weapons but sometimes in the future, there will be plenty of those lto chose from

Example I summon my pet it stands there docent move, docent do much at all, in fact after a few mins it disappears, so in-game wise this is normal behavior, so to see a pet running around jumping is OOC. IN my imagination it is running around and doing all the things it would be reasonable to expect a pet to do. but the reality is it at the moment just stands there.

I think your pet is sick or something ^_^ [<--- IC] Too bad animal doctors are not implemented yet [<---OOC]

What's with all the attacks, he expresses his opinon, and yet you feel the need to laugh and speak to him as if he's a child.

DO YOU THINK THIS!!, HAHAHA, I'm going to laugh, .... well isn't that great.

Geeze Lighten up.

He wants a little more realism, that's all, and wants people to comform to the same rules you promote.

And i've never seen you make an event, so why are you so gung ho for them.

Step up and make a few if they're so GREAT!!!! in your mind.

I was wondering when you'll show up.
And your point is....
Besides the obvious test for our brain reaction time while trying to solve this existential mistery underlined by my previous question and the evident increase of a certain number on the left of your post. 

@ Nikodemus: That bug happens alot, actually, and the way to go around it is to hit the attack shortcut again [if you have a /target clear command in it] or to deselect the target, select it again and start another attack. None of the aforementioned things should pose a problem if the player is at the keyboard. But, yes, it is a bug and the auto-attack compensates for it. The problem is that it only compensates for the effect, and does not fix the cause. That bug should be fixed instead of implementing a new feature that will compensate for it. Especially since this feature has certain "issues".

@Janner: Yes, I have been killed a bunch of times by monsters while talking to somebody and that is really annoying. But, I still don't like the auto-attack feature. Why? Because it does nothing. It will save you from a monster that deals low damage on your character [and in this case it is useless because you would have survived anyway or you would have to type a reeeeally long phrase to give the NPC the chance to kill you], but it won't help you if the npc do you a higher damage, because of the long delay until it kicks in [I, at least, will recieve 6 hits ort so until my char starts fighting and usually, after it starts fighting, considering that the NPCs that do me any damage at all have quite some high HP values, it won't be able to finish the fight before he wakes up in DR]
And now some statistics:
Having a maxed stats char, there are only a few monsters that do you any considerable damage: Ulbers, Mean Tefusang, Brigand, some rogues [excluding gladiators and the like since they don't have "agro", meaning they won't chase you around if near a spawn]. Try pulling an auto-attack stunt on these monsters mentioned above and check the results.
Btw, this goes for any stat levels, the only difference is that the list of "deadly NPCs" will be proportionally larger.
So, yeah, this "feature" is only useful for farming PP and for making automation scripts [or bots, as we like to call them] easyer since you'll only have to do a macro for looting while the game "takes care" of all the fighting part.

The auto-attack feature should be soooo removed IMO...

Im stuck... help?

Type /unstick or if that doesn't help, type /die
Or... you could explore the area for an exit, or ask ingame because from here, nobody can show you a way out.

By the gods! It is true! All hail the three!


What? I have three legs! Ummm... no, wait... that was my tail. *gigles, gulps an apple and leaves to find some other signs related to the magic "3"*