The first day I saw the name of Roleplaying Master was choosed, I met Zan ingame, and discussed a bit with him, that I recall as the first one to propose the creation of this figure. After doing that, I PM Chaos.
Very recently, we had seen threads where misunderstandings are the common source of problems; for instance the one that had to state (for the n-th time) that 500 advisor points != being a Game Master.
I feared, that choosing the name \"Roleplaying Master\" could lead to people, not only to consider that with that name their rp is placed in a lower level, but also could claim \"Where are the points you\'ve to earn to become one\" like happened with the Game Master issue. This misunderstandings are a headache to all the community, I think; and thus, should be tried to be avoided before they have the chance to appear.
If the problem lays on a name that brings confusion, and unfortunately it\'s been proved that it brings it, then the best way to face it is change it, and adopt another one, less conflictive and perhaps more descriptive. Now that this new figure is at an early stage, it\'s the moment to spot, and fix those possible problem sources.
With my conversation with Zan, I specifically asked him if the name he suggested was \"Event Master\" and I seem to recall that was the name, well, but now seems that \"Master\" recalls too much to \"Game Master\" but it was chosen, precisely, for that similitude.
Since, as Keyaz said, both Game Masters, and Roleplay Masters are separate entities, the best way to, again, avoid the confusion, would be to have non-related names; that could lead to people reading one, and then recalling the other, thusly, stablishing a connection between the two.
I suggested Chaos the name of \"Event Manager\" as it seems that Master was bringing too many problems.
The name of \"Roleplay Master\" was picked up amongst others that were in mind, seeing how things turned, I suggest either reconsidering the initial decision, or making a public poll, so the community decides which name describes in the best way the RM functions, while at the same time keeping away any possible source of misunderstandings that, too often, end up in personal flaming.
As for the initial post, by Lanstri, I think he was, where he stated his alarm, when seeming to understand that he was prompted to write down all his rp actions in this forums: I recieved, in game, tells that where pointing in that same direction. I don\'t know if the stickies aren\'t clear enough, as when I read them I didn\'t had that thought Lanstri and others seemed to catch, but, again, if that feeling is shared by more than one person, perhaps there is indeed something in the writing that leads to think on that direction. Now I\'ll seem like the one who wants to rename it all
but I\'m just seeing, while I write this post, that the forum is called \"In Game Roleplay\" perhaps it was that what lead those players to think that they were supposed to state about all their ingame actions here.
So, just again, the purpose of this subsection of the forums is making a track log of all the events that were assisted by this new figure, the RM, and the players that participated on any of them, are encouraged to post about their feelings while the action was performed ingame, and they can also add comments, suggestions for future events or criticism on how the event went.
At another time, there can be also a debate about the events themself, but, for the moment, I think that the whole conversation should be driven again to a constructive sharing of ideas.
I\'m neither used to long posts, Kythag
but I think it can add another point of view, hope all of you can extract something useful from it.
See you all ingame.
EDIT: Changed recognize for spot, I think it fits better. I think recognize only has a meaning of searching on military environments, or perhaps not even that...
Well, like that one said, more or less: Don\'t read what I wrote, but what I meant.