PlaneShift

Support => Linux Specific Issues => Topic started by: Seneche on September 06, 2007, 06:25:06 am

Title: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Seneche on September 06, 2007, 06:25:06 am
I have been noticing that most of the problems Linux related here are based on an Ubuntu version. So my question is, why does everyone choose Ubuntu? I do not want to start a distro war here (because we all know Opensuse would win :P), but what gives people? You see all these issues with Ubuntu and still like it   ;)? so anyways, just wondering, what is it that other Linux's can't do that makes you like Ubuntu, because it's certainly not the most robust distro by any means.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: bilbous on September 06, 2007, 07:01:59 am
It is geared towards new users moreso than others, has an active community and will mail you install cds for free. It uses Gnome so I do not like it, of course suse is in bed with MS and used reiser fs by default so I don't use it either. I'm not really married to any flavor, other than KDE but some java app or freebsd just trashed my mandriva so I am stuck with Fedora atm.

That is of course more than you asked for, maybe I'll try and get my Slack going again....
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Xordan on September 06, 2007, 08:39:57 am
There's always Kubuntu (which I prefer myself) if you don't like gnome.

But yeah, Ubuntu is favoured by most newbies to linux and I'd recommend it for newbies too :) People generally have problems because they're new and aren't really aware of the graphics issues that linux can have, mainly in configuration.. I think that if newbies picked any other distro, we'd see a large amount of problems based on that other distro.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Nukm on September 06, 2007, 02:37:08 pm
well, im using ubuntu now for one year and did not have any specific ubuntu issue that couldnt be easily solved until now with planeshift...

i am just using it because it was the first linux distro i tried and it was good to work with from the beginning.
maybe it is because i dont understand enough of what is going on under the hood, but why should i use another distro? never had any probs with ubuntu and right now i dont see anything that i could do with another distro that i cant do with ubuntu.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Seneche on September 06, 2007, 03:56:14 pm
Well I suppose that sums it up, but I still had more problems with it than anything,.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: bilbous on September 06, 2007, 06:23:06 pm
I really dislike the sudo philosophy of ubuntu, I have had it installed before. As I have stated before the first thing I do is sudo passwd root and change my root password to something a million other ubuntu users do not have. This allows me to login to a shell as root to do my business and there was an issue a couple versions back where the root password was visible in plain text in the file system which was a security issue. I just do not like having the developers know my root password and me not knowing it. Possibly paranoia on my part but easy enough to fix.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: monktbd on September 06, 2007, 10:38:10 pm
I really dislike the sudo philosophy of ubuntu, I have had it installed before. As I have stated before the first thing I do is sudo passwd root and change my root password to something a million other ubuntu users do not have. This allows me to login to a shell as root to do my business and there was an issue a couple versions back where the root password was visible in plain text in the file system which was a security issue. I just do not like having the developers know my root password and me not knowing it. Possibly paranoia on my part but easy enough to fix.

uhm...
Quote
sudo -s
gives you a root shell as well....

the visible password bug was really quite a shock but got fixed pretty fast back then. more annoying was the crash of the xserver for a dapper update that got fixed fast as well but was inacceptable for new linux users.
why should the developers know your root password though? if you did not set one for the root account there simply is none.

as for distributions:
ubuntu or mandriva for me (got chased by mandriva who decided to put a beta version of the xserver in the final product of the 2006 and being pretty outdated for the 2005).
i still think that mandriva is better for new users although you find easier help for ubuntu if you have a question.
also i prefer deb to rpm.

and to the original posters question: clearly all the problems with ubuntu and planeshift are posted because it is used most often and also most often by new linux users, as was stated above. i have no problems besides the sound disappearing sometimes which does not really disturb me.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: miadon on September 06, 2007, 10:51:26 pm
Seeing so much "Ubuntu Porn" everywhere is driving me nuts 8| I really dislike Ubuntu.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: evil scotsman on September 06, 2007, 11:05:28 pm
I don't think the problems are so much with Ubuntu, as with the present state of the Linux client, and it's probably the fact that Ubuntu has a large user base at present, especially with new users, and lets face it, Linux isn't the most user-friendly OS for running anything as demanding on the user as Planeshift.

Many problems are related to drivers, and as a long time Linux user, I know that drivers can be difficult to get running, anyone who has tried to upgrade or update a kernel driver will tell you that it can descend into dependency hell pretty damn fast, to say nothing of requiring the kernel source, matching compiler and tools, and sometimes a broken kernel is all you end up with.

So unless someone knows of a distro that has the latest drivers, is easy to update/upgrade, comes with full kernel sources, is in active and has a good user support community behind it, i'll be sticking with my own personal favourite, it's not Ubuntu, or any of it's other flavours, it's slackware based, and it's not really new user friendly, but i'm used to it...... Now all I have to do is install an Nvidia driver based on an older kernel version that I don't have distro kernelsource for...........

 :whistling:
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Seneche on September 06, 2007, 11:09:02 pm
I use Opensuse 10.2. It's not to user friendly to new users, and it does not include the latest kernel unless you update, but community is great, an I love it. So I think that the problems are with Ubuntu, because Opensuse works fine. And this was a general Linux question, having nothing to do with planeshift, so drivers, etc don't matter.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: monktbd on September 06, 2007, 11:28:39 pm
I use Opensuse 10.2. It's not to user friendly to new users, and it does not include the latest kernel unless you update, but community is great, an I love it. So I think that the problems are with Ubuntu, because Opensuse works fine. And this was a general Linux question, having nothing to do with planeshift, so drivers, etc don't matter.

i really doubt it is that much distribution based, i still use dapper and have no problems besides the sound but there it can either be my hardware with two sound cards in use in combination with an already old alsa system.
i think the problems are bound to specific hardware and distribution/kernel version/graphics driver version. a general "does not work well with [insert distribution here]" is just wrong in my eyes. i have seen too many things on linux working for one person and not for the other within the same distribution version to blame a distribution entirely.

to deepen the original question why i chose ubuntu: back then when dapper came out it was arguably the most complete distribution out there with an easy installation and gnome. it came with long term support and i didnt feel like changing my distribution version every 6 months or every year to be fine with (security) updates. also the ubuntu community is big enough to provide backports for quite a few applications. compiling some that do not exist myself was rarely a problem. i have an old computer so my hardware is well supported by older kernels making a kernel upgrade to a newer version unnecessary. by no means i think that ubuntu is the best distribution around for everyone and i am glad that so many distributions exist and a lot are even very good ones. the real enemy sits in redmond ;).
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: z44sms on September 08, 2007, 06:15:28 pm
Why Ubuntu?

I tried Debian, RedHat(Fedora), and Sun(SUSE). 

First:  Debian 4 / 10

It's got over 4 dvd's and not one GOOD thing comes on by default. I mean ZERO. It's gives you like the worst possible tools in the LINUX community on KDE / Gnome and ZERO plug-ins installed.  For god sakes it's 2007 and it's just coming out with a graphical install process this year.  You only can download it with some PEER-TO-PEER software basically sit around for 4 days to collect your ISO.  Worst out of the box setup I seen since slackware in 1996. The only redeeming qualities are it's community is huge, software archive is massive, and it's pretty much the only true Linux outlet for open source left. 

Second: Fedora 8 / 10

You got a good packaging system RPM one of the first. Nice overall install it's kinda a big pain to go into MULTI-VERSE (MP3,WMV, ect) your DVDs don't even play by default. You got to go in an add alot of software also FEDORA is still part of Redhat. Who knows maybe RedHat will just shut it down one day.   Takes 1 DVD or 3 CDs.

Third: SuSE 7 / 10

You pretty much the exact same thing as FEDORA only different is I don't like its interface as well but it has
better system utilities for admin. 1 DVD or 3 CDs.

Lastly: Ubuntu/Kubuntu 9  / 10

You got a SINGLE CD I don't have to wait >2 days to collect my downloaded ISO.  I can boot off the CD and use a LIVE version right away with the POPULAR TOOLS.  The whole point of Ubuntu is to give YOU (DESKTOP) tools that doesn't happen with Debian.  You got the most popular tools based on stats. Already nstalled on KDE or GNOME.  You can install the thing with only 5 questions.  You can open up the package viewer view by popular tools that were not installed but you need like a backup program / Anti-virus extra, on click then hit apply.  You click it and it's done.  Also the issues above with MULTIVERSE / non-free, Ubuntu's setup puts in the websites / FTPs to access the multi-verse or non-free in for you automatically so you don't spend all day in setting up the box.  The amount of waisted time I spent looking for non-free sites for playing my codecs is huge and setting up repositories that I hope don't have mal-ware is another issue.   Only downsides are Ubuntu tried to make the desktop too safe with SUDO everywhere.  However, you can just go into add users and put root's password in and enable root and your done.  Also their manual partitions setup at first install could use some work. But overall it's the best Open Source Linux distributions I have seen lately.   

Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Xordan on September 08, 2007, 11:16:21 pm
and Sun(SUSE).

Novell, not Sun :) Sun makes Solaris.

You got to go in an add alot of software also FEDORA is still part of Redhat. Who knows maybe RedHat will just shut it down one day.

What's wrong with RedHat? :P
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: bilbous on September 09, 2007, 01:33:04 am
Well Rathead is American and they are the source of all evil to some people. I added the Freshrpms repository and have had no trouble playing anything. But Fedora is a distinct entity from RedHat, it was spun off a couple years ago.

Novell is in bed with Microsoft, that is an issue for some people, I really did not like their defaulting to reiserfs but now that its copyright holder is in jail for killing his wife Suse should be going back to extfs.

I personally like Mandriva  but my drive it was on is in the process of pulling a "mission impossible"(this message will self-destruct...) so I am going to have to re-install it when I get a new drive. Most of the distributions do not enable the (possibly) illegal software repositories but it is generally pretty simple to do for yourself once you know where to look. The distro forums usually have links.

I like to have several distributions set up but it can be a pain setting the boot loader, as usually they only look to see if windows is there and do not recognize other linuxes. They often offer to update another distribution to theirs but will not add it to grub if you leave it as is. I suppose that is not too surprising.

Anyways trying to keep several distributions updated is sheer madness.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Cyl on September 09, 2007, 09:38:25 am
Well I can just speak for myself, but I started off with Gentoo right away, and had a VERY hard time figuring things out...
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: monktbd on September 09, 2007, 02:26:13 pm
Well I can just speak for myself, but I started off with Gentoo right away, and had a VERY hard time figuring things out...

well i think that is to be expected with being new to linux and using gentoo. but i guess you leanred more within the first week about linux than a lot of ubuntu users do in their first year....


about redhat/novell and their free distribution spinoffs: i doubt that you can detach them from the main corporation behind it, as you cannot detach ubuntu from canonical and mark shuttleworth surely will want to make some more money with it and his goal surely is as well to make good business with ubuntu. big graphical desktop applications and the desktops itself would not be where they are right now without the help of corporations (trolltech, novell, sun, ibm, redhat ....).
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Seneche on September 11, 2007, 06:21:46 am
That is true, I learned more in an hour using the Linux From Scratch Project, than I did in the 2 1/2 years on Ubuntu.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Het Irv on September 14, 2007, 02:01:25 am
For me it was convenience.  The first Linux I was handed was a Ubuntu disk and told go have fun.  And I have, the community is great, some software doesn't work quite right but in what distro does everything work.  Drivers suck. I spent 2 weeks trying to get my wireless to work but all in all.  I like it.  Mebey after I am more confident I'll pick up another disto and mess with it. Ubuntu = n00b friendly :D
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: mawdryn on September 15, 2007, 10:00:47 am
I've been running Ubuntu for well over a year now and I have no complaints it.

It was the first debian based distro I tried. I had previously used Slackware 2.1, Redhat 7.3 through to 9 , Mandrake 10.1 and Fedora 4 and 5, but Ubuntu surprised me with it's live CD function and various other features that I had not seen previously in linux.

It installed with ease and it worked first time which amazed me, and I've never had any real issues with it. I can't say I've seen a more user friendly distro in my experience. Even my wife who's ... er... average with computers had no problems adapting to it's ease of use. I've stuck with it ever since.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: overlow on September 22, 2007, 10:03:40 am
My reasons why ubuntu is simple, it's only distro where i can find help for finnish. I like more about fedora but when i come to any prob with it i can't get help with my own language. I bet that's one of the biggest reason why use ubuntu, that it is for most languages in the world, and many of them has their own forum, that other distros have forums maybe english, french, german and spanish, or some more large languages, but not to small countries languages what ubuntu have.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: geloren on September 22, 2007, 08:28:13 pm
I have been asking myself the same question lately.
After Fedora Core, (K)ubuntu, Mepis, Mandriva and finaly Opensuse... i have never really understood why people seem to like ubuntu-based distros the most.

For me... Fedora and Opensuse kick ass...
Ubuntu based systems always got me into trouble... most of the times, i couldn't even install it properly or it wouldn't boot the live cd well.

I guess what makes it popular is (and we can't ignore the impact of it) the free cd's you can request by the ship-it service. leave your adress, and ubuntu linux is coming to your home.

That's the only reason i can think of.
Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: Xordan on September 22, 2007, 10:07:34 pm
Ubuntu uses apt, which is the best binary package manager imo. That alone makes it one of the best for me :) It feels quite polished and 'just works' when doing many things too. I suppose experience depends quite a bit on hardware. Wireless support is still horrible compared to Windows, but that's true for all distros.
Title: Ubuntu? I just lovin it!
Post by: sliss on September 26, 2007, 09:58:22 pm
I love ubuntu! I work on Linux for like 10 years redhat 5 was my first. Than for a long time Mandrake. Went on with Gentoo and still am as I think it is the best.

But.. Ubuntu is quite nice.. I use the development version Gutsy (7.10) on my laptop and I am very happy with the result. end of October Gutsy will come out of development and man it will be great! compiz-fusion out of the box. Lots of nice features are on its way. And to compare it back to gentoo installing a new package is way quicker.

ps is not working properly on ubuntu though ;-) but didnt put much time in it either.

Well I can just speak for myself, but I started off with Gentoo right away, and had a VERY hard time figuring things out...

aii :)  well it is a good start I think as it shows you how the system really works and gives you very much options.

cheers,

Title: Re: Why Ubuntu?
Post by: disi on October 11, 2007, 01:48:52 am
I like Ubuntu, just for the reason that it makes the Linux community larger. If there are more Linux users, there will be more drivers and apps for everyone  :thumbup:

For myself I switch a lot, but since 2003 always fall back to Gentoo. Before that I liked Slackware and Debian.

I tried Ubuntu and you can get your System installed within 10min up to your Desktop and all drivers, they did a good work to make things easier for users.

edit:// for comparison, it took me 4 days with my last Gentoo to get a proper Desktop... and still testing around (atm I try to get the temperature of my gpu's down)