PlaneShift
Fan Area => The Hydlaa Plaza => Topic started by: Drachion on October 22, 2003, 09:44:39 pm
-
ok because moogie told me to clear some things up i tought i\'d go with it.
i\'m not some sick freak that actually think he\'s the devil ( i wish ) i\'m just your avarage student that like\'s rp-ing.
also i\'m going back to be evil again without the hatefull flame-ing.
i bit of information on the character itself:
Weapons : Whip,claws .
Pet : Gigantic snake .
Slaves : Auran .
Alignment : True evil .
Age : 4516 .
eats : Souls .
Music type : Cradle of Filth .
Reason : Son is lead singer .
This character has been used for a D&D story so most of it is from a existing person.
ok the music reason eats and slaves has been inserted into it but it makes it possible for me to become the character.
if there are any questions i will answer them in here as a normal person as me outside this psot i will be the freak of nature that hate\'s his own mother...
-
Well, don\'t get confused because moogie asked you...because no one really cares.
-
i know but before some people actually start thinking i\'m a sick idiot like that.
oh well maybe i am but just a bit
-
heh i figured you were rp-ing, is stopped a while back b/c not many people do in the forums.
-
ON EVILNESS
You know, you have a problem. It\'s hard to RP a OOC C. :)
Secondly there is the community which is generally good aligned and thirdly, you can\'t commit any crimes in PS yet without repercausions. So much for real evil.
And being evil doesn\'t mean you have to be stupid. Flaming is silly. An Evil guy would tell a child that his parents divorced, \'cause of him and not \"spam\" him to death with pointless remarks.
So here at the forum it\'s the same problem. You can\'t do anything evil/illegal without a reprisal(or great skill ;)). Nobody will think of you as true evil, if you continue to *corrupt* the forum. We\'ll not even give you the \"satisfaction\" of hating you, but we\'ll feel sorry for ya.
So there\'s no really evil things/ppl yet.
oh and please respond in a constructive manner.
-
Heh! Well Drachion, not that I don\'t like what you are doing, but most of your actions don\'t hit as hard as they could have. You may have the wits but you are just not using it. You want to be evil fine, even commendable since it takes guts. But real evil is not about the cultist crap you usually dish out. Thats the problem with you kids. Most of the opinions here about evil are laughable(yes i mean you Draklar and Rhyxali) You jump to things without really doing any homework or giving it thought. Now most of you guys work under the impression that the devil epitomises evil. Hah! Thats as much nonsense as thinking God epitomises Good. Nothing of the sort. There is nothing in absolute terms. Good is good compared to the evilest person you can locate and vice-versa. God symbolises empathy while the Devil stands for apathy. I\'ll explain the devil to you but first let me clarify some thing else.
D&D RPlayers tend to think that chaotic,neutral and lawful are gradations of behaviour. That chaotic evil is the most evil, then neutral and lastly lawful. Nothing could be more wrong. These things are just what they say eg- chaotic evil is just plain chaotic, not governed by an intellect, implusive and instinctive. Essentially its the kind of senseless evil that psychotic or lunatic people are but they are definitely not the most evil nor the most dangerous, they are just out of their minds. Nothing could be more evil than a cold and calm intellect, devoid of empathy and working for its own ends.
Comind back to the devil : why on earth would you think that the devil would behave like a lunatic by being chaotic evil. He has his own agenda to push: that of exacting revenge on man and god for casting him out of heaven(i hope you know your theology well enough to know about how Satan came to be. If not I\'d be happy to tell). He knows his own powers and weaknesses and also that his final destinty is eternal damnation. In short he\'s an individual with a complete understanding of himself and others. He is also wise enough to know when he\'s beaten and is not below grovelling at someone else\'s feet to forward his own interests. So in short he\'s clever and will not stop at anything to have his goals fulfilled. Although he wants everyone damned, he doesn\'t go about randomly killing everyone because he knows he needs followers too to spread his corruption. Also he never talks apolcalyptic occult talk to ensnare people, he\'s a very rational fellow who knows that nothing appeals more to people their own selfish ends. What does one care if you live in a fiery pity and are the ruler of hell, all they care is what you have to offer to them.
So don\'t act a cultist imbecile and say that you have modelled yourself after the devil in front of me boy. Even though I am not a christian I have read more of their theology than you could dream of. For I also at one time was like you thinking that the devil was as you think of him and fascinated. But then I grew up.
So my advice to you would be to incorporate a little sense into the things you say. Polish your act a little bit. You have the zeal but lack the direction. Go this way and you will end up like Bin Laden instead of becoming Bill Gates. (Now Bill Gates is much more evil than Bin Laden but how many realise that?(.). I know you are better than most of this herd of Idiots we have here but you are blurring out that difference fast. Stick to your routine but tone it down a little and bring a finesse to it. Then I am sure I\'d be happy to acknowledge you as the symbol of evil in PS. Until that you are just a kid trying too hard. If you ever need help with anything dont be too proud to ask. I would gladly help.:)
Anyhow, Best of luck in your endeavours :).
PS-
Monkey photos are not really the best way to piss me off (infact there is only one thing that really winds my clock but figure it out yourself:D). I hardly care for childish pranks:).
-
Originally posted by Auran
Thats the problem with you kids. Most of the opinions here about evil are laughable(yes i mean you Draklar and Rhyxali) You jump to things without really doing any homework or giving it thought.
Says one that thinks spamming threads is evil ;)
c\'mon Auran, tell us what is true evil... in what way art thou evil? :P
-
actually i do aggrree with ya auran most people dont have a good definition of evil
-
i think Auran is one of those people ;)
Originally posted by Auran
That chaotic evil is the most evil, then neutral and lastly lawful. Nothing could be more wrong. These things are just what they say eg- chaotic evil is just plain chaotic, not governed by an intellect, implusive and instinctive. Essentially its the kind of senseless evil that psychotic or lunatic people are but they are definitely not the most evil nor the most dangerous, they are just out of their minds.
here, read this definitions of:
Neutral Evil:
Neutral Evil people are most concerned with \"what\'s in it for me\". A NE person will try to always get something out of a deal even if it\'s not the best they could do. A good example would be the ranger that is willing to provide information for a price, but won\'t be the guide for the party because he \"don\'t want to get involved\" or be bothered with it. These are the \"informants\" and \"shrewd businessmen\" of society. Sandoval (FBI Agent) and Da \'Orr (Lead Taelon) from Earth Final Conflict show this alignment well.
and
Chaotic Evil:
A Chaotic Evil individual will base their decisions on what is \"best for me\". Thus, CE people will do whatever is the best choice to further their own ends. An example would be a fighter that becomes a bandit and steals from travelers then kills them to keep them quiet or to cover his crimes. He sees nothing wrong in what he is doing. The valuables he gains are his money and the silence of his dead victims allows him to continue on his way. These are the \"psychopaths\" of society. Norman Bates, Freddy Kruger and the like are good examples.
-
I think you\'re wrong Draklar. Auran is nearer to the truth.
The way alignments are divided in D&D inhibits checking for what is the most evil. Any kind of evil can be the greatest(size); the first part of the alignment doesn\'t matter much.
So lawful evils are the most cunning as they have things planned out, but maybe they\'re just not flexible enough.
The chaotical ones are CHAOTIC, that means that they\'re half crazy.
So I guess the neutral evil would be the best, the best of both without so expressed extremities. But maybe, that\'s just what doesn\'t give them an edge.
So you can never know. Alignment in DnD isn\'t made well in that aspect. There\'s no such thing as ultimate evil(or good).
-
D&D alignments lack two things: Graduation and the end purpose of actions.
Figure it out.
-
You \"kids\" tend to forget that the D&D alignments (and all its rules) were intended for players ages 10 and up, meaning that it had to be simple enough for a 10-yr-old to understand (I\'m assuming you\'re all at least 10 :P ). Besides, true evil goes beyond simple definition of \"alignments\", since the truest form of evil encompasses all aspects, not just one stereotype. True evil is more of a formless entity or an existence of some kind as opposed to a physical embodiment or tangible manifestation.
And Auran, don\'t preach to me about theology. I went to church for more than 20 years, and managed to pay attention most of the time. I also studied outside the church circle on other aspects of basic theology, trying to get the largest possible picture from various cultures across history.
Originally posted by Auran
God symbolises empathy while the Devil stands for apathy.
Apathy n.: Lack of interest or concern, especially regarding matters of general importance or appeal; indifference.
Also means the lack of emotion or expression.
Nothing could be farther from the truth. The Devil does care very much about beating God at his own game. God wants to save His precious creations (us), while the Devil wants to damn them as he was damned. That implies purpose, and a purpose cannot be sustained for eons without drive/passion. That is not apathy. If the Devil was truly apathetic, he wouldn\'t care at all, and we\'d all be guaranteed a spot in Heaven without any catches or rules to live by.
Originally posted by Auran
chaotic evil is just plain chaotic, not governed by an intellect, implusive and instinctive.
Wrong again. If that were the case, all animals would be classified as evil, since they act on instinct. People who are called evil do evil because they choose to. That implies intellect; the ability for a sentient being to make his/her own choices.
Auran, trying to say that others\' stated opinions are laughable only makes you appear like an insecure little boy who needs his mommy to nursemaid him some more. I don\'t post without giving thought to what I say? Rubbish. A majority of your threads/responses are entirely forgettable. My first post garnered three pages of good discussion. When was the last time you had anything of real value to say? Your post in this thread is the most intelligent thing I\'ve seen from you so far. If you continue this trend, you just may end up a valued community member... ;)
[edit] Sorry to steal your thread, Drachion. I knew you were Rp-ing. We had another person on the boards who was abusive *cough*Link*cough* and he was banned. He was just plain mean. At least your type of badness was \"themed.\" :)
-
in my book is stated that lawfull evil is someone who will do anything aslong as it is evil if he has to save someone without killing anyone he won\'t accept even if he gets payd loads for it.
chaotic evil on the other hand will. they are not caring about evil aslong as they get better from it so they will do it just for the cash.
someone who is simply evil will follow the group he\'s in but by his actions you can see if he is evil or not, like if he comes across a child with a chuppa chup he will simply take it just to show everbody he is evil, more like a pickpocket person or a rouge.
-
Imagine:rolleyes:! This kid Rhyxali is teaching me about how to become a valuable member of a community *shakes his head in dismay*. And just the fact that you went to church for 20 years regularly shows how much you understand theology(\"stupid ritualistic conformism\" thats what I term it). I dont know if you agree or not but just knowing theology makes no sense until you understand and interpret it. Any fool can pick up a book and read it. What makes the diference is how you interpret what you read. Similarly you could attend church for eons and still be no closer to grasping what this is all about. I am sure if you told us what God and Devil are about in your perception, it would come out as that ridiculous religious notion that is spoonfed to you at the church. Just to help you out I suggest you read secular literature as well besides the Testaments, Bible,The book of Exodus and the lives of saints etc. I recommend among others:
\"Demonologia\" by J.S.Forsyth ( the title of the book is longer but you\'ll have to find it out yourself. I am too lazy to type it out:D.)
\"The Autobiography of Satan\" by J.R. Beard
\"The Political history of the Devil\" by Defoe.
They\'ll enlighten you about the wider scenario not just the religious point of view. And I never talk about anything unless i am sure that I know more about it than my audience;). It is a wise practice as I have often had the chance to observe.
I said apathy because I meant just that. However I feel what you said is also valid hence I am obliged to give a clarification. I mean apathy in the sense of not caring what one does and how it affects others in the pursuit of one\'s aims. I hope now I am clear enough. I am sure you cannot fail to agree on the other things I said about the devil. If you have doubts let me know and i\'ll be happy to clarify:).
I laugh some more at you for your idea that I implied animals being evil. The word chaotic implies \"wanton\" and \"random\" behaviour. Animals kill for the purpose of self preservation. If an animal begins killing wantonly it is indeed conidered a nuisance and is shot. I stand firm in my belief that Chaotic evil is indeed the brand of evil for pathologic imbeciles.
However I do not condemn you for your ignorance. It is not your fault that humans are so chronically stupid and blissfully dogmatic about their opinions bred out of ignorance. Even I myself do such stupid things sometimes that I am apalled by them. What you can be blamed for however is if you fail to remedy your ignorance. Wanting to remain ignorant is the greatest sin a person can commit.
So I hope I will have the chance to debate this topic with you once again when you are more conversant upon it:). However if you are like most of the human race then you will probably voice your foolish opinions again without amending your lack of knowledge. In that case I admit apriori that I am indeed wrong about everything I said and you should be happy about your wisdom. It is no use trying to change idiots hence I will save the myself effort.
-
Originally posted by lynx_lupo
I think you\'re wrong Draklar. Auran is nearer to the truth.
The way alignments are divided in D&D inhibits checking for what is the most evil. Any kind of evil can be the greatest(size); the first part of the alignment doesn\'t matter much.
So lawful evils are the most cunning as they have things planned out, but maybe they\'re just not flexible enough.
The chaotical ones are CHAOTIC, that means that they\'re half crazy.
So I guess the neutral evil would be the best, the best of both without so expressed extremities. But maybe, that\'s just what doesn\'t give them an edge.
So you can never know. Alignment in DnD isn\'t made well in that aspect. There\'s no such thing as ultimate evil(or good).
Nah, you\'re wrong on that one :P
chaotic isn\'t about being crazy...
i mean robin hood was chaotic-good and i don\'t think he was much of a crazy guy ;)
chaotic is about freedom, flexibility and so on...
I see greatest evil in one that sees nothing wrong in murdering, slaughtering innocent or killing random guy to get his money. Someone like that is chaotic-evil...
-
I wouldn\'t say robin was Chaotic. I mean he did wait and strategise before doing anything. I\'d say he was more like neutral good.
-
hmm, neutral good sounds right for him. Chaotic good would mean that he would go to any measures to do his stuff.
An example of Chaotic good:
The inquisition.
They went around killing \'witches\' and \'heritics\' not caring how many innocent they killed with them.
The Witch trials.
Burnt \'witches\' at the stake. If they were innocent it didn\'t matter
-
thats not a good exaple due to the fact that the person belevies that witches are his foe. If he knew he could possibly be killing good people and didn\'t care that would be evil.
on the other hand if he was oblivoius to the goodness then that it chaotic good
-
No, it would not be evil, as he would be doing it for a good cause. If u read my definition of chaotic good, then that would be obvious. Any measures means that killing someone innocent is fine.
-
Okay I am beginning to ge confused myself so let me just restate-
Chaotic = Actions done randomly, wantonly, without deliberation. Example - A religious zealot.
Neutral = Actions done after consideration of fulfillment of one\'s own motives. Example- A rogue
Lawful = Actions done to fulfill one\'s own motives taking into consideration the laws and codex of the land and society. Example- A policeman.
Does everyone agree regardless of Robin\'s alignment. If you do I think we have a consensus.
-
I generally agree, there are a few details, but I agree.
-
:rolleyes: The inquisition was chaotic-good yeah... right...
It wasn\'t neither good nor chaotic
I don\'t know what good do you see in what they were doing, and how were they chaotic. Chaotic is about freedom and flexibility, also movements against law. Things they were doing were part of law, I\'d say they were lawful-neutral
Originally posted by Auran
I wouldn\'t say robin was Chaotic. I mean he did wait and strategise before doing anything. I\'d say he was more like neutral good.
Auran, you still don\'t know what chaotic is about :P
well i repeat: chaotic is about freedom and flexibility. Not about making quick decisions.
Robin was moving against law, and what is opposite to lawful? ;)
-
Chaotic is about both of your aspects.
And lawful isn\'t just about Law, just like chaotic isn\'t just about Chaos. Lawfull=more premeditated, chaotic=less or not premeditated, in this detail.
-
Ok, here are descriptions of lawful and chaotic :P
Lawful characters tell the truth, keep their word, respect authority, honor tradition, and judge those who fall short of their duties. Chaotic characters follow their consciences, resent being told what to do, favor new ideas over tradition, and do what they promise if they feel like it.
\"Law\" implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include close-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, and a lack of adaptability.
\"Chaos\" implies freedom, adaptability, and flexibility. On the downside, chaos can include recklessness, resentment toward legitimate authority, arbitrary actions, and irresponsibility.
Lawful (Honorable): A Lawful person will uphold his Moral Law first (the law of Goodness if Good or Just behavior if Neutral-- Evil is actually not a Law but the lack of such), his sworn oaths second (paladin\'s code, monastic vows, etc.), his governmental and societal laws and traditions third, and the laws of other governments and societies last. The transgression of a higher-priority Law will always cost a great alignment hit than the transgression of a lower law.
Chaotic (Rebellious): A Chaotic person doesn\'t just feel free to break laws, rather he DESPISES authority and feels COMPELLED to rebel against all authorities and to openly flout laws even to his own detriment, even when no benefit can come from doing so. He takes an alignment hit whenever he alters his behavior in order to conform to some law, the more restrictive the law the greater the hit.
and about Robin: :P
Chaotic Good:
A Chaotic Good person bases their decisions on what \"best serves the people\". So a CG person will take matters of justice into their own hands to make sure that what is \"right\" gets done. An example is a rogue that finds out about a merchant that cheats his customers and then sets about stealing and discrediting the merchant due to the fact that the \"local law\" won\'t or can\'t do anything to stop him from cheating the people. These are the vigilantes of society. Batman, Robin Hood and similar characters are good examples.
-
Draklar, you do not prove anything by taking quotes from other people\'s opinions/rules/what the hell ever.
-
yeah, but if those are definitions taken from website like that (http://nwvault.ign.com/index2.shtml), then it means something ;)
-
Nope, not at all...someone still made them up for the game, whether or not they took it from someone else, it is all their opinions which I do not share.
-
Originally posted by Draklar
I don\'t know what good do you see in what they were doing,
I don\'t see any good in what they were doing, but as u don\'t know the defination of good, then I don\'t see u\'r point. It isn\'t what I see which makes them good or evil, it\'s what the people see themselves as.
Edit: I have to agree with Kiern. These arn\'t your opinions, someone elses, and as those people arn\'t Gods, then what they say shouldn\'t be seen as the final word.
-
Originally posted by Xordan
I don\'t see any good in what they were doing, but as u don\'t know the defination of good, then I don\'t see u\'r point. It isn\'t what I see which makes them good or evil, it\'s what the people see themselves as.
good is someone that wants to do good stuff for others, cares about others and not himself. Wants others to have better life. If you put inquisition under that then i think you are the one that doesn\'t know what good is.
Originally posted by Xordan
I have to agree with Kiern. These arn\'t your opinions, someone elses, and as those people arn\'t Gods, then what they say shouldn\'t be seen as the final word.
Furthermore you might say same about definitions in rpg rulebook :rolleyes:
All i wanted to do is to show you definitions of some allignments, because i\'ve seen some weird descriptions of chaotic here:
chaotic is half-crazy: what\'s the problem in being crazy lawful-good, you just see monsters to hunt everywhere, maybe you just have seeing things, but still your goals are same, therefore you have same alignment.
chaotic is about doing stuff without thinking first: as above, why can\'t paladin be like that? Why must he do everything thinking it over first. It is just way of doing stuff, it doesn\'t change your goals/views so you don\'t need to be chaotic to do that.
-
Religious zealots are not chaotic. They have been pushed through propaganda into believing something. This does not imply chaos; in my opinion, the deliberate actions of an organization imply law.
If you think I\'m wrong, it\'s not my fault, it\'s because you don\'t understand me.
-
No I was talking about a unary zealot not an organisation but I agree with what you say . That still wouldn\'t capture the true meaning of chaos. If you stick to the essence of the word chaos the I\'d have to give the example of a \"pathological lunatic\".
-
Chaotic is opposite to lawful so i think chaos goes under anarchy here, not \"pathological lunatic\".
-
The nine pole alignment idea is not the only way to define roleplay. Gary Gygax (sp?) is not God. most of the world use a much simpler form of classification.
Forsyth does not try and fit the world into a Gary Gygax alignment tree and no one else should either.
And people! include some Kant with all that reading your doing!
-
Yes derwoodly, thank you!
I don\'t see why everyone is so obsessed with this alignment thing, it\'s rather odd and not important.
-
*looks around* Where\'s Drachion?(.
-
To me, Good, Evil and Neutral are three mutually exclusive alternatives. A person who is neutral is self-serving or helps/hurts others on a case-by-case basis.
A person who is evil is doing bad things and things like hurting others, messing up forum threads, making people mad are an end unto themselves.
A person who is good is doing things like being helpful, trying to explain things and add value on forums, and working to reduce/eliminate evil.
This means terms like \"neutral evil\" are oxymorons.
Chaotic and Lawful are the other axis of measurement, and don\'t apply to being neutral. The Inquisition was definitely lawful (good or evil depends on your perspective). It was done under the auspices of the national and supranational authority at the time and the people who executed it were following orders, not breaking them.
Robin Hood was definitely chaotic. He acted in unlawful ways to do good, as interpreted by him. The ends justified the means, and his ends were as he saw them.
I would call the Mafia lawful evil. They have a strict hierarchy, a strict code of honor and extensive rules about how/when certain things happen. Groups like gangs in LA or the Medellin Cartel also fall into this category.
Chaotic evil tends to be individualistic, imo. Jeffrey Dahmer, Hannibal Lecter, and drug addicts robbing people in the park are all doing what they feel they have to do or want to do with no regard to any kind of code or honor among thieves.
Auran talks like he is chaotic evil, but by forming the Cabal organization he is stating his wish to be lawful evil (and to make those laws himself). Personally, I just think he is hilarious and is neither good nor evil, neither chaotic nor lawful.
There. I can\'t believe I responded to this thread.
- Venge
-
I cant believe vengie boy responded either. I\'ll check if its him or just one of his automated response programs a.k.a. \"Bot\"?(.
*Pokes Venge in the eye*
Venge: OW! X(. You friggin @##%&*#.
*surprised*..*to himself*
whaddaya know it was him :D.
*kidnaps him and hauls him off to the secret Cabal HQ for brainwashing with Cabalist Propaganda*
The rest of this story follows
Vengeance suddenly came to. He looked around in the gloom. Trying to move he realised that he was held fast to a horizontal platform by straps around his neck,waist, ankles and wrists. The straps felt metallic by their cold touch. He struggled for a while but realising it was futile, gave up. His eyes getting accustomed to the semi-darkness, he began to make out more and more details of his surroundings. He could dimly make out the rafters of the roof above.\"I must be in some kind of a large hall\", he muttered to himself. From what could see he realised he was in some kind of a very large room dilapidated through disuse. There were holes amid the roofing through which he could see peices of the sky. He judged it to be dusk from the scattered shreds of melacholy red clouds.
A dank, musty smell arose from within, as is usual with ill kept rooms. He could hear noises of rats scurying about. Another thing which strongly impressed his senses was the smell of sulphur as in alchemical laboratory or a foundry.
Minutes ticked by but they seemed hours to Vengeance. The thought that was eating him right from the start was why and how he came to be in this situation. He could remember dimly his being in some crowded place. A blow to his head. It still throbbed. He attempted to touch the spot but was again reminded of his forced inertia.
Suddenly there were footfalls. They sounded like shod feet walking briskly through a long, bare gallery. There were mutliple persons surely and the sound of a long rapier striking against chainmail and the rustling of robes were also discernable. The feet drew near until they were right within the room, sharply ringing on the stone floor. The sounds ceased a few feet from him. He could hear whispers near his head but was unable to see anything being restrained. They seemed to be conferring in hushed tones. He waited. Soon, he thought, he\'d know his fate.
Dusk had crept into night and the darkness in the room seemed to coalesce into twisted abominations. The minions of darkness. The voices near his head had ceased. Suddenly a dim light filled the room. A torch had been lit. Someone addressed him. \"Vengeance\", the voice said,\"your life as you know it ends today. From this day on you will become be a servant of the darkness. You will help us spread our corruption. You will be one with the Cabal\". \"B*stards\",cried Vengeance,\"I\'d sooner die\". \"Ah! But you will\" said the voice. Then began the incantations. Strange words of some long forgotten tongue now ressurected by some mage\'s voice. The torch went out and vengeance felt the darkness close in again. There was a something unnatural about it. It seemed to dance and swirl around him. The incantations grew louder and louder, faster and faster, forever changing their rythm and tone. Now they seemed pleading, now argumentative and then commanding. Suddenly there was silence. Everything seemed to stand still. And then with a rush the darkness seemed to enter him with the force of a raging river. Through his ears, him mouth, his nose until it choked him. Pulsing through his veins with a life of its own. His senses were flooded with an intense pain.He tried to cry out but was stifled.
Vengeance woke up with a start. He was in his bed, in his home. He would have dismissed his experience as a dream if not for one detail: He was one with the Corruption now. The taint pulsed in his veins.
END
the next day at the breakfast table:
Vengeance: Robin Hood was definitely not Chaotic and The Cabal is god.
*:P:P:P:P:P:P:P:P
If that seems like a lot of trouble to prove Robin hood not Chaotic then I have to agree with you:D.
BTW- I also noticed a funny thing. Look what happens when I type \"B_astards\".(I inserted the underscore to avoid the censor scanner :).)
\"Bastards\"
Notice anything:P:D. How someone thought that a \"peanut\" made a suitable replacement for this word is beyond me?( Atleast they could have made it \"illegitimate progeny\" :D. (I have to guess maybe PAXX had something to do with this ;))
-
If I were a member of the Cabal reading Auran\'s homoerotic fantasies about the devs right now, I\'d be running the other direction...
Makes one wonder what Auran is doing to the real members... ;-)
-
Read it again venge. Its got edits now:P:D
Homoerotic ?( What made you feel that way. But I am happy as such. I always wanted to write erotica. :D
-
[ shoots auran ]
idiot
and i never expected this to go about good or evil how things can turn around.
oh well back to evil me again.
OOC : :P i\'m a schyzo, no really :P
Drachion drags Auran\'s body back into the pit of evil throwing him back to the mines he escaped from.
SIT.
Auran sit\'s down in a instant, trembling with fear.
Drachion opens his eyes and says: You pathetic little .... ( reminds himself he would stop flamming ) Bunny rabbit You really don\'t know your own strenght now do you.
You shouldn\'t kidnap administrator\'s, you are to weak and foolish to do so...
You should leave that to the pro\'s
Show\'s security tape to vengeance and waits for vengeance to emerge into pissed off ness or something like that....
See cabal you cannot out run a demon ( or his spies ) so sit tight and wait for hell to break loose on you guys :]
-
Friendly advice:
Smilies don\'t really go with your persona Drach. But what the hell, do as you wish.
-
Originally posted by Auran
If that seems like a lot of trouble to prove Robin hood not Chaotic then I have to agree with you:D.
Yes Auran, it is hard to prove something that ain\'t true ;)
Tho it\'s easy to prove Robin was chaotic...
Robin Hood was outlaw, a rebel, therefore he was opposite to lawful. Alignment opposite to lawful is chaotic.
Chaotic is about freedom and flexibility, about doing what you want.
-
Dont make me kindnap you DraklarX(............:P:D
-
Originally posted by Auran
Dont make me kindnap you DraklarX(............:P:D
he is right, though :P
-
oh shhh Xalthar, you\'ll get us both kidnapped ;)
Besides... Auran knows i\'m right, that\'s just his plan. He kidnaps and then \"corrupts\" you. Then when you\'ll lose your mind... err get \"corrupted\" ;) he\'ll have a chance of you joining his guild :P
-
lucky me i have a strong will and mind so he can never corupt me :D
and kidnapping, /me starts running to the secret tree house in the middle of the city and burns of the stairs.
hmmmm save...