18
« on: July 24, 2008, 08:11:28 pm »
If the system is going to be a roleplay system, then it ALL has to be RP. RPs must modify any and all other RPs when they intersect IG. Coherent IG meaning must be extracted from any RP that is not up to muster (in the eye of the beholder), and the characters must react, interact, or disengage in an accordingly IC manner. To speak OOC of RP in game is to sunder the very foundation of the world. Now, this is not easy, for the settings is very different from most of the concepts of fantasy worlds that most people will understand, and the pitfalls are many for the novice. I always thought that an appropriate response to anti-settings RP was confusion on the part of the character. Not OOC criticism, and especially not taking it to main channels or into IRC. No brackets, no criticism. Confusion, befuddlement, mystification. Any character should have a few stock phrases that they would utter when faced with something that is outside their experience, unfamiliar to them, or simply nonsensical to them. Critiques of RP are definitely OOC IG IMHO. And ultimately, alignments are nothing but descriptors of behavior. Substitute whatever labels you like, there is a spectrum to character behavior and there will always be ways of describing it, and breaking it into factions.