Originally posted by fken
Even if Im against rape, I recognize raping is natural because it\'s the way some species choose to save their specie... For us (poor little human beings, born in industrial society and educated by this society) this act is awful but ONLY FOR US.
...
I think people need to know the part of the nature hidden in itself to understand rapists and then to judge them.
...
I simply cant think someone born criminal
Raping as a reproductive strategy is a most disturbing and very controversial theory. While I understand your point, allow me to differ.
Concerning animal species other than humans, violent sexually-motivated assaults and penetration sometimes occur, this is true. The \"defining attribute of rape in humans is the lack of informed consent, which is difficult to determine in other animals\" (Wikipedia). Now we have two options, either it looks to us like rape but it is not (some form of anthropomorphism) or it really is rape. In this second case, I believe that such behaviour is exhibited by a minority of the given species so it is not \"normal\". Also, the fact that it is not widespread can be used to show that it is not a (suitable) reproductive strategy (if ever this is what it is).
Now concerning humans, let us assume that rape is biologically motivated or \"natural\" as you say. It is therefore part of our nature (or that of people with rapist genes, if you adhere to that idea) which makes every man a born criminal (the very idea you abhor).
Rape \"is awful but only for us\", as you say. According to Wikipedia, rape \"is considered by most societies to be among the most severe crimes.\" My opinion is that the greater the equality between genders (or the less women/children are regarded as objects/inferiors) in a society, the more likely it is that rape will be severely punished in that society.
Like you, I believe that no one is born a criminal. Human beings are capable of thought and of choice. This is precisely why rape (whether biologically motivated or not) cannot be excused.
Originally posted by DepthBlade
As far as we know, the guy hasn\'t sold off his songs yet like the beatles some others.
Actually, Jackson bought a majority of the Beatles\' titles during the 1980s (now jointly shared with Sony). However there is much speculation about whether he sold/will sell them because of financial problems. Afterall, Neverland is a money pit and he has settled a number of lawsuits for quite a large sum of money.