I trust the development team is reading this thread with keen interest. This is definitely a discussion between autocrats and people with more liberal ideas.
I truly believe the developers are doing this \"labor of love\" for the enjoyment of others, and not for their own selfish interests. As I would think, the greatest reward for their work would be for more and more people to appreciate and benefit from it. If this were not the case, this would be a closed game and joining would be by invite only, and maybe Seytra, you would have you own little retreat for you and your friends to role play in
your own way.
I also think that unless the naming rules are kept reasonable as originally intended, (not a GM\'s interpretation) this game will never grow. But I think that is what you are really trying to achieve, Seytra.
This weekend, i noticed the max on line was approximately 60 people.
60 People in the whole world! I will not mention other game names, but the ones I checked had a lot more people online. Why is that?
Maybe they like the game conditions better than PS and are willing to pay to get the name that suits them or the more common interpretation of role play. Most of us \"fools\" play the games because they are fun, not because we have to listen to a bunch of dominating GM\'s telling us what we can and can not do. A GM even threatened me in a thread. If the developers do not want something to exist; put it in the code. Do not leave it up to hit and miss attitudes in game play.
Originally posted by Seytra
No, in PS, I prefer to roleplay, which is what PS is about, actually.
You keep using the term \"role play.\" You do not need skill attributes, or a graphical setting. Why do you not make yourself an irc channel, dress up in your dominatrix outfit and just sit there and role play with any one who is meek enough to join you?
Originally posted by Seytra
Did I say anthing else? No, I didn\'t. Yet, the PS team has set the rules which the GMs are enforcing.
The GM\'s are enforcing
their interpretations, and they sometimes make mistakes they do not want to admit. Like getting \"trigger happy\" with names. I still see nothing wrong with \"Gunrod.\"
Indeed. You fail to see it because you are unable and unwilling to accept that your idea of PS is not only not mine, but also not the one of the PS team, which can be concluded from what they state on the mainsite.
More properly stated:
Indeed. You fail to see it because you are unable and unwilling to accept that your idea of PS is not only not mine, but also not the one of the PS team, which can be concluded from what
{you understand}[/b]they state on the mainsite.