Keep it mean, keep it clean.

I still maintain that I wasnt trying to insult him. He was being a menace in my opinion.

*leaves the silliest thread he has ever seen

Happy to assist in breaking a record.

Originally posted by Exaero_Fiero
Sounds like you couldn\'t rephrase that sarcastic remark to produce a useful critique. I knew that 1 brain cell could not hold logic!

The very nature of a sarcastic critique is that it is not constructive. My main objective was to illustrate this. Some how we have duked it out over a number of different issues.

Belligerent, tongue in cheek criticism may hold merit to the poster but to someone that has put work into a website and as a result has a feeling of accomplishment and satisfaction it may just lower their self esteem and cause them to under value the work which they have completed.

Its this line of reasoning that lead me to the conclusion that there is a strong \"Role Playing Snob\" presence on these forums. You may not understand where im coming from but thats of no concern to me.

Quote

Originally posted by Cirque
I believe \"thee\" has the lesser mind. For \"thee\" thought little about that post before pressing \"Post Reply\". Nah im being to fair. You more than likely destroyed 10 brain cells from your total of 100 to squeeze that ludicrous response to fruition.

Quote

Originally posted by Exaero_Fiero
So what? It is still about 90 times more than what you have...

Quote

Originally posted by Exaero_Fiero
Sounds like you couldn\'t rephrase that sarcastic remark to produce a useful critique. I knew that 1 brain cell could not hold logic!

Well yeah... brain cells dont regenerate. Your argument cant be that air tight with slip ups like that.

Quote

Originally posted by Cirque
CONSTRUCTIVE criticism is always welcome.

Intresting...

Quote

Originally posted by Cirque
There was no request made by the thread starter for you to critique the site.

A little contrary, isn\'t it?

Its not overly contrary if you can understand what sort of criticism IM talking about. For someone thats making bold claims about their superior intellect I cant understand why you cant comprehend what sort of criticism im refering to.

Id reply to the rest of your post but its just tit for tat. You rewording my posts against me. If you posted something amusing and original id have a crack at it.

By the way the 2nd language call is always a nice \"ace up the sleeve\".

Constructive it is not.

\"Your doing that the wrong way!\"

Not constructive.

\"Your doing that the wrong way, perhaps if you do this to improve...\"

Constructive.

Sarcastic comments are not constructive but as I said earlier are, arrogant useless remarks.

I believe \"thee\" has the lesser mind. For \"thee\" thought little about that post before pressing \"Post Reply\". Nah im being to fair. You more than likely destroyed 10 brain cells from your total of 100 to squeeze that ludicrous response to fruition.

guide you to the artwork it needs to be replaced with?

Its not your site. You are not a member of the guild. You are not required to view the site. There was no request made by the thread starter for you to critique the site. Therefore your suggestions were not required much less arrogant, sarcastic ones.

Futuristic is a matter of perspective and opinion.

It has just occured to me that there is a select group of people on this forum that are not your average run of the mill \"Role Players\" but are in actual fact \"Role Playing Snobs\".

So on one end of the spectrum we have Griefing, Leet Speaking Power Levelers, and on the other end we have Role Playing Snobs.

HAHA! Thats rather amusing.

Sounds like griefers to me. Theyre worse than blatant PKers. At least PKers limit their combat to the intentional use of the PK system. Where as this griefer scum exploit a flaw (yes I consider this 2nd challenge system as a flaw) to PK other players.

I personally dont accept any challenges. This eliminates the possibility of griefers getting the drop on me.

Id like to see the monsters that are visually holding weapons (eg. Rogues, Bandits) to become lootable to make it not only more realistic but profitable.

And lateral and diagonal running animations.

Originally posted by Zan
That sounds good .. or perhaps they can only lose their anomaly state when killed by certain weapons or magic. Like for example a werecreature would only lose it when it got killed by a silver falchion. Or an elemental would be destroyed when killed by magic of its opposing element.

Of course they would have special stats according to their type.

You could even have a profession that players can choose like they would a smith or a cook that is a specialised unit of the city guard. So they are equiped with certain materials and or weapons to convert a were creature back into its original form or exterminate it completely.

They could gain access to this position by having certain skills and or stats and have to belong to a regular guard position for a certain period of time. To make it even more challenging they may have to undertake certain training before being granted the job.

This would cut down on your \"uber\" power leveler fighter from just nominating himself as the hunter.

Originally posted by Vengeance
I haven\'t heard any coherent descriptions of what the RPers want.  What do they want?  What are they missing now?

The ability to cut up wood with an axe and make a fire. Also the availability of a tent and the ability to pitch it.

A sideways and diagonal walking and running animation would be nice also. Even the various movements associated with jumping and landing. By the way whats up with enkidukai not being able to jump higher than dwarves lol?