Author Topic: Interesting review of different roleplaying types  (Read 1938 times)

Gilrond

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 764
    • View Profile
Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« on: May 05, 2013, 10:37:48 pm »
http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm

It's written in context of MUDs, but very much applies to MMORPGs as well.

Illysia

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2774
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2013, 05:20:31 am »
I remember that paper. It is interesting to say the least, but I always felt that MMOs did bring enough new dynamics to where there should be more than 4 categories, even if those four are probably still the major groupings.

Taya

  • Associate Developer
  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 143
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2013, 12:15:41 pm »
I have seen versions of this that do go on and further divide the categories. No links to hand for it though sadly.

It's definitely an interesting thing to look at either way, but I've also never been able to slot myself or a lot of other players I know very neatly into the categories. I guess it would be interesting to hear which different people think they are and why though.

Pakarro

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 119
  • My kind mistress is Pakerl from "The Family"
    • View Profile
    • meet Pakerl
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2013, 05:03:48 pm »
One should never put people into slots. The slot "human" would be ok, in most cases at least...
Glad to meet you :)

LigH

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 7096
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2013, 05:30:24 pm »
You won't "put a square peg into a round hole", anyway. Unless the hole is so big that any peg would fit. And there are sometimes pegs which make their own holes.

So, come on, let me entertain you!

Gag Harmond
Knight and Ambassador
The Royal House of Purrty

Gilrond

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 764
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2013, 07:48:24 pm »
Pakarro: As any archetypes, these don't describe individual people. They describe tendencies. All of them can be present in any particular individual in various proportions. So it's an interesting research.

Volki

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 879
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2013, 05:56:12 am »
One should never put people into slots. The slot "human" would be ok, in most cases at least...

You're absolutely right, Pakarro. We should treat everyone the same, ignoring both their imperfections and specialties. In this case, personality differences that translate into playing style. This is the cost of categorizing people. Cornering them into definitions just so we can better balance our games. It's inhuman. Who are we to strip away a person's conformity... The injustice of it all!
Lace dark dreadfull power inside him awakens now fully resultin his former self comin back lord of dark noble house shantae of mevango family lacertus shadowone mevango also knowed as darkblade of shadows

Denes

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: Interesting review of different roleplaying types
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2013, 11:07:27 am »
Study of human behavioral patterns is hardly a new field. Might get controversial though, as it is not a “hard” science IMO.
+1 for the interesting part. Thanks for sharing!

PS: My favorite quote from Life of Brian:
Brian: Look, you've got it all wrong! You don't NEED to follow ME, You don't NEED to follow ANYBODY! You've got to think for your selves! You're ALL individuals!
The Crowd: Yes! We're all individuals!
Brian: You're all different!
The Crowd: Yes, we ARE all different!
Man in crowd: I'm not...
The Crowd: Sch!