Author Topic: New sig (Read 4437 times)

lostprophet · « **Reply #30 on:** September 20, 2003, 10:24:04 pm »

Once I checked and it was 32. Jeepers.

Moogie · « **Reply #31 on:** September 20, 2003, 10:46:23 pm »

Ok, I\'ve added a bit about treating newbies nicely under the Flaming rule.

lostprophet · « **Reply #32 on:** September 20, 2003, 10:57:24 pm »

I hope you weren\'t insinuating anything at me moogie, I\'m good as gold around newbies

Moogie · « **Reply #33 on:** September 21, 2003, 12:51:16 am »

I wasn\'t insinuating anything at anyone lostprophet, what made you think I was?

Btw, I said I didn\'t want to be the one who creates the code of conduct... so somebody adopt it, quick! *shoves it at Drilixer and runs away screaming*

Jedi · « **Reply #34 on:** September 21, 2003, 01:14:00 am »

Wait a minute...if Moogie can steal that makes it okay, right?

Yay!

That CoC was pretty unproffesional. There was a lot missing. CoC\'s are usually huge things as long as your arm chock full of sentences with half meanings and big words that don\'t mean anything.

I was working on one, geez. Patience, people, patience! :rolleyes:

Kada-El · « **Reply #35 on:** September 21, 2003, 01:16:49 am »

Didn\'t we also used to have a certain standard about what was appropriate in terms of names and sig images, which we have let slip? Shouldn\'t sigs such as your favourite high performance car or bikini clad star of the silver screen be off limits for a game that is supposed have it\'s roots in the realm of a medieval style fantasy role play?

Just something to consider for a code of conduct depending on how strict you want the forums to ultimately be.

Author Topic: New sig (Read 4437 times)

lostprophet

(No subject)

Moogie

(No subject)

lostprophet

(No subject)

Moogie

(No subject)

Jedi

(No subject)

Kada-El

(No subject)