I think the problem is the \".\". As _we_ know, it\'s a hidden file because of that so you can only see it if you use the -a option to ls. Also, when posted on a website, the leading period will most likely be interpreted as a typo, as can clearly be seen by the fact that Xyl asked for \"bashrc\" and not for \".bashrc\", as would have been correct.
But the \".\" (any period, for that matter) is also part of the filename (as opposed in Windoze and DOS), so \".bashrc\" and \"bashrc\" can _both_ exist simultaneously inside the same directory without interference, except some minor user confusion.

Therefore, if Xal would create a file named \"bashrc\" and would place the stuff in there, nothing would happen because the system reads the file \".bashrc\".
Also note that linux is case-sensitive WRT filenames so you can also have \".Bashrc\" in addition to \"bashrc\", \".bashrc\" and even \"..bashrc\", so watch your typing!
