Originally posted by sesmi
please read my whole post, it also says \"stoping rule breckers!!!!\" being nice to ppl is also a good idea, thanks a lot 
I agree with Monketh and DepthBlade on this. If you\'d start handing out rewards to ppl. who have reported someone, this would then create something
very bad: framing and over-scrutiny. Ppl. would actually be looking for anything that they could report so that they might eventually reach some sort of critical threshold if they only report sufficient little things. This would create a very unpleasant system. Reporting should be a
last dirch thing, which should only be used after negotiation has failed or if the rule breach is so severe that it must be dealt with immediately (like heavy cheating). Also, ppl. could report others for things they didn\'t actually do (or that they are not quite certain of).
I would not want any of this. Also, you\'d likely not gain nor deserve any respect for reporting any minor thing, you\'d do much better trying to persuade.
Reporting flaws and exploits is
normal, i.e. nothing that deserves extra respect!
Not doing so, however, deserves extra shame. (I.e., good policy should be
natural.)
If we start to rely on some abstract entitiy to govern things, society is going to degrade by comfortably handing their freedoms away and soon we will have a report-and-defend system where nobody even
talks (let alone
tnink about something they didn\'t like about someone else but instead reports it and then waits for a verdict. (sounds familiar, doesn\'t it? *cough* Court system *cough*).
Also, I don\'t think they were not nice to you, sesmi, they just disagreed with you.