Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
This is simply not true. I frequently find myself with thousands of PP on which I have not the tria to spend. The only reprieve in this is finding the occasional jewel encrusted longsword of ways that will fetch well over 50,000 tria from a vendor.
This used to be the case before the wipe, but since then I have, without one single extraordinary weapon drop or gift,
by far more tria than PP. In fact, money is not an issue anymore, PP are. Obviously I\'m doing it wrong if you have thousands of excessive PP even now.
Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
Indeed it is. Taken at its most literal, \"power-leveling\" lies entirely within the scope of roleplaying, assuming that one\'s character is the type to have the drive necessary for that. I am not sure how Seytra is getting the impression that it isn\'t so.
Assuming that the char is the type, this is the key. Only very few chars would realistically be the type to do so, and also even these cannot keep slaying without doing anything else in between. Maybe our definitions of PL differ, which has been the case on these boards more than once. To me, PL means not a char that is played well and spends a lot of time honing their skills of choice.
In fact PL is when a player does not care about a char, and thus works the game mechanics to attain the skills that are most useful instead of realistic. A PL would, given it would provide benefits, train lawn-mowing, even if his goal is maxing axe skill.
A properly played char would almost never do that. As my statement about RPers becoming powerful implies, I acknowledge the existence of properly RP\'d yet mostly levelling chars.
Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
I believe that was his point. You don\'t care about all of those skills exactly equally, do you?
I\'m not exactly sure about that, actually. As I said, it is even realistic to train both weapon and armor skill concurrently, and in fact I at least care about both somewhat equally.
Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
Originally posted by hereticalfaction
Our charachters are the heroic elite of the fantasy world they occupy.
This is not unrealistic. Take the word \"roleplay\" at its most literal, and what do you have?
In an MMORPG, it is a lot less realistic than in PnP RPGs. Traditionally, you have only very very few \"heros\" IRL, which PnP RPGs can simulate perfectly, due to the small playerbase per virtual world (i.e., number of players per GM). In an MMORPG, most definitely not even close to everyone is / can be a hero. The hero population exceeds the normal population in MMORPGs, and thus the \"hero\" concept doesn\'t work there anymore. I\'m inclined to believe that neither the concept \"hero\" nor the word \"hero\" would even evolve in an environment like that.
Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
But it quite simply is not. In planeshift, mostly, if one needs ore, one learns to mine. Therein lies the problem, perhaps? But there are far too many disparate skills to classify and diversify properly. I doubt that everyone will go so far as to craft their own armor and weapons, and so, as the game progresses, the problem may well fix itself.
Indeed. If you RP properly, there is almost no way a char will master all skills. You may eventually end up using your skills as workalike for some additional ones, but most master mages won\'t go down into the caverns to learn mining. The workalike may be using golems or melting spells to extract ore (which won\'t be \"mining\" skill), but a rockpick is unlikely.
Originally posted by zanzibar
Originally posted by Karii_Winterwalker
Such people are not playing the game the way that it was meant to be played.
There will always be people like that. People make the claim that the powerlevellers will come, get fed up, and leave. Well hey, I\'m still here!
Yes, there will always be abusers like you (thanks for publicly stating that you knowingly and willfully abuse PS). This does still not mean that we need to simply accept their presence. It means that we must take measures to minimize their number.
Concerning your remaining statements:
Originally posted by zanzibar
Like I said... you don\'t even realize what you\'re saying.
That is objectively false.
You seem to presume many things. Obviously, I consider at least some of your presumptions to be incorrect.
As usual, you provide absolutely nothing. All you do is claim things without providing any support. It would be nice if you, for once, would actually present facts or at least something that might be classified as reasoning to back up your statements. But obviously that would not allow you to easily twist your statements to be able to wiggle out of anything, as you have done repeatedly in other threads, so you obviously have no interest in a proper discussion. Thus, all you are doing is wasting everyone\'s time.