Wired_Crawler:
Nice story, but it is complete fiction, unrelated with Nikodemus life. So i don\'t know why you put my name here. But i don\'t care much.
Also, in the story you showed Nikodemus based on short fragments of my posts, ignoring all the rest, so i\'m not really sure what you was trying to show with it.
\"Yes, Proffessor. You see, the numbers given by the author are very reasonable, and, as You can see, these *points to blackboard* calculations are correct
I have already agreed that the book isn\'t very accurate and pointed at some other fact. Other informations which you can learn from it, even if it isn\'t really accurate
Also, you should consider that the l3 is straight on the picture, but abslutely wouldn\'t be when looking at the place of Yliakum where it is. If the angle would be 25 degrees, then the tophography would be like slope of some mountain chain. There are such places on earth and people live there, cultivate plants and everythink don\'t fall down.
To avoid furher mistakes:
But i don\'t actually think it is this wayTalad: I know there is almost vertical 5km high wall beatwen each level. And from the book it can be clearly found out that they are not vertical, but its distance from the centre of stalactite at top is smaller than at the bottom.
However my calculations say nothing about these 5km high cliffs, the picture show only area of First Level and other lines are only to help the calculations and explain them.
Are you maybe suggesting that each of the levels have small grades. Like first level have grades and that explain why its angle is 25 degrees? But I doubt it is what you meant. EDIT: (like on Wired_Crawler picture \\o/)
I didn\'t supposed that it will be you who try to answer my question, I feel so speacial
But please, if you could look at this again?
