I might not be getting the real sense of this, but:
there was no use of ooc except that i was following the conersation starter who was using these () i didnt understand why it would be put tin those, but if the conversation ahd been read by the gm then it would ahve clearly not have been ooc..
Let's see.
When someone makes an OOC statement, somehow that has to be marked.
One of the most common ways to do that is sorrounding the sentence with "( )" or "[ ]".
There are other variants, such as OOC: and then the sentence... but this doesn't matter much now. This, you already know, Kalika.
The important thing, is that the one that started the conversation, the one that was using the parenthesis, considered the conversation OOC. That's why he/she used the parenthesis.
If the starter of the conversation, had no notion about what OOC is, and what is the meaning that most commonly is assigned to all sentences sorrounded by ( ) within the game, then it's on players responsability to inform said player of those connotations.
Kalika, you're perfectly able to do that, and politely.
So, assuming the conversation starter is fully aware of OOC, and the use of parenthesis to mark it, then I've to state the following.
Even if the talk that is put in OOC form, might pass as an IC talk, it is not your duty to make it so. If the conversation starter considered the conversation OOC, then it is OOC, and should remain in that plain.
Hope you feel better once you threw that out, good to see you're actively playing the game.
