Yeah, I was going to say that too LigH.
I have also some stuff to add:
1) There should be a disclaimer when searching. This disclaimer should say something along the lines of "Information on characters refers to what is generally known about them. When roleplaying, do not use any of this information, unless your character has acquired it itself."
Why... Because it'd help with keeping people focused.
2) Also, I'd change the "character" types to this:
- Rogue;
- Ranger;
- Fighter;
- Caster;
- Social;
- Merchant;
- Laborer;
- Crafter;
- Entertainer;
- All Around.
Why? Ranger account for sneaky, agility based characters that actually don't go around stealing, they just scout and stuff. Social type characters are characters with representation functions, like recruiters, diplomats, preachers, event planners, etc. Entertainers are an obvious call. All Around type accounts for the characters with plenty of areas, like more than 2 or 3 of the above. Dudes, it's the system we have.
3) I'd add a section called "Demeanor" and make it include fields along the lines of: "Passive, Aggressive, Kind, Protective, Witty, Moody, Criminal, Selfish, Undisclosed (For those who don't wish to share it / despise the utility of the function.)
Why!? Because, as far as I'm concerned at least, it would be a great help with choosing which chars to include for my plot. I may need a passive rogue, or an aggressive caster or one of those Undisclosed Rangers which act like a wildcard. It makes choosing a whole lot easier, since you don't have to read each mage's description until you find one with a mindset of your liking.