I know this is just restating what has been said, but with the reasons given, it wouldnt be any different them removing hammerweilders or such. I am sure those that are playing Diaboli would not mind to wait .... that is part of playing Beta, you wait for the full version to complete, even if that will take quite a bit of time. I play a Ynnwn, but without the Diaboli .... I really wouldnt exist.
Also the first impression was otherwise, I think that's what it's all about: bumping the development of the diaboli down the priority list. Maybe that did not get across in the first statements here. And it certainly got lost in the heated atmosphere.
I play a Dermorian - and I can wait for whatever the devs have planned in terms of a city. Every hint or piece of information that is released and enables me to play my character more convincinly is appreciated. And if it doesn't fit with the character's backstory, well, if it's nothing vital, I can rework.
Well, he called me a dickhead. Then seems he edited his post (I just reduced the ban to 30 days now). I can tell you that's not a great idea to call the leader of a game you want to play a dickhead.
Well, be happy he didn't threw an iron d20 into your direction in the heat of the frustration.
Also, I am quit sure that some of the players connect more than "playing" with the word: creating, filling with life, shaping. Since this game is under development, players and devs might get into nasty fights - in the end, they have the same goal. Every fight takes energy away from creating, and might drain away good people that walk away in frustration. Balancing the kind of world the players already created and the official development of settings would be nice and most likely beneficial for all. Mainly, this means better communications.
I feel this thread has gone pretty wrong, just my opinion. About addressing player concerns this was the reason for me to answer the posts and explain the reasons, but seems is not really appreciated.
It came surprising for the players. Your argumentation made sense from a development point of view, but still there were flaws as has been pointed out. Most of us, the players, would really appreciate a higher amount of information and discussion. Maybe someone finds flaws that where overlooked before, that's the great thing with communities. But communities need a certain amount of grooming, if one can say so. And then one might get something back from a nice community.
Enjoy your choice.