|
Bug Report | 2656 | No | Crafting Transformations | Low | Assigned | Caarrie | Davide VescoviniTuathanach | list of crafting bugs | 08.08.2014 | | |
Task Description
this bug will include any bug related to crafting.
|
|
Feature Request | 2658 | No | Inventory/Items | Medium | New | | | giveitem command for players | 26.03.2009 | | |
Task Description
Syntax: /giveitem [PlayerName] [Qty|All] <ItemName> [Any]
Playername is optional, otherwise default to selected target, fail if none selected
Quantity is optional, default to 1, All gives all in inventory/equipped
ItemName required, quotes needed for multi-word item names as in “Platinum Ore”
Any is optional, allows items in containers to be given. Omitting this protects containered items from being given accidentally, allowing players to put things in sacks or other containers that they want to keep safe, same as the Drop command.
Similar to GM giveitem, but with the following restrictions:
player and target must be in touch range
player and target may be sitting or standing
player and target must not be otherwise busy (fighting/crafting/repairing/etc.)
no restriction for target being overburdened (available slot/stack/capacity limits still apply, see Caveats below)
similar to PVP, players should have persistent selectable option for receiving given item(s): Always Accept / Prompt to Accept (default) / Never Accept
Along with the command, make Give an option to context menu, which opens a slot window same or similar to that which one gets when giving to an NPC.
Justification:
Caveats:
Makes using mules a little easier, as in an unattended mule with Always Accept can become a dump bucket for loot or Ore, however current trade rules allow this already, the only difference is that the mule must be attended to complete the trade, while not for receiving a Give. Eventual random spawns of monsters will mitigate this for loot, and miners still have to move all the collected ore to wherever it is to be processed or sold. IMHO the benefits to RP outweigh this issue, since miners have already worked around unattended trading to some degree, either by mAlting or dropping stacks while guarding in proximity.
Extending the idea, add a die-roll chance for target and near proximity observers to be made aware of the exchange. Giver’s Int. and Agility should apply, and Target’s Int. and Observer’s Int. should apply but I’ll leave it to devs to work out how to implement. Any exchange that is more than 1 single item should incrementally raise the chance of being observed. One might still have a good chance of slipping a couple daggers into someone’s pack, but a stack of 20 Ore would be nearly impossible not to notice. Sleeping target might also factor in.
A further extension might be an optional Sneak parameter whereby the Giver attempts to be especially discrete in the exchange, thus lowering the chance to be observed by the target or near proximity observers, but this should be mitigated by quantity as above.
|
|
Feature Request | 2767 | No | User Interface | Medium | New | Andy | | Saving throw commands for Roleplay | 20.02.2009 | | |
Task Description
Saving throw commands for Roleplay
Example:
/dodge
ROLL =< AGI results in “[player] dodges.” ROLL > AGI results in “[player] does not dodge.”
/jump
ROLL =< AGI results in “[player] makes jump.” ROLL > AGI results in “[player] misses jump.”
/sing
ROLL =< CHA results in “[player] sings a lovely song.” ROLL > CHA results in “[player] lets out an awful screech!”
ROLL = random(200)
Might also be expressed like…
/saving agi dodge dodges|does not dodge /saving agi jump makes jump|misses jump /saving cha sing sings a lovely song|lets out an awful screech!
Variations on this are almost endless and could apply to any stat or skill. Saving throw commands are designed to be used by a single player, with the results shown in the channel originating the command.
|
|
Feature Request | 2777 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | New | weltall | Rizin | Shared Quests | 12.07.2009 | | |
Task Description
There should be a way for players in groups to share quests they are doing. So they could talk with others about them and do them together. All will get the quest complete when they complete the task given by the npc (and maybe a copy of the reward for each one): this could make quest allow players to socialize more. The biggest problems in implementation could be the case in which quests might overlap, the fact players might want to chose the quest they want to share and the variations which could be in dialogs when talking with a group of people versus a single one. The players will get the shared quests added automatically even if they didn’t have them provided they have the correct prerequisites
|
|
Feature Request | 2778 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | New | weltall | | Group Quests | 01.04.2010 | | |
Task Description
This is an entirely new class of quests where the person or persons who originally get the quest are asked to form a group to solve some more complicated task or martial challenge. Once the quest is completed each member can then “turn it in” or go to the originating NPC for a reward. Unlike shared quests, it will be impossible to finish grouped quests without the aid of other players. This is intended to promote teamwork and to give a more deep and realistic experience to players.
|
|
Feature Request | 2867 | No | GUI | Low | Assigned | Firiban | Joe Lyon | Display tabs only when neccessary | 22.09.2014 | | |
Task Description
Hi, to make the interface less confusing, please let the chat window have the “Guild” and “Group” tabs only when the character is in a guild or group. Or at least make hiding these tabs an optional feature.
This would also make it possible to add an alliance chat tab to the chat window without bloating it for the people who are not in an alliance. see my FR #2688 for this.
|
|
Feature Request | 2886 | No | GM System | Low | Assigned | Brian | Aresilek Besolez | gms report logs Completed Check mark | 20.12.2009 | | |
Task Description
Adding a check mark by each report to note someone has worked or completed any actions that needed to take place. A spot for notes might be nice as well.
|
|
Feature Request | 2951 | No | GM System | Medium | New | A. Kiefner | | /petition improvements | 28.06.2022 | | |
Task Description
1. Ability to teleport to the player from the petition window 2. Player side: /petition should open the petition window with a short introducing text (in another text window?) how to use the petitions (not to post wishlist items there, how to use (possible) categories..) 3. There should be a drop-down menu for selecting a category [Not Specified; Movement; Bugreport; Name; Event; Harassment; Quest; Miscellaneous] to classify the report. This could be used for statistical purposes post-process as well. 4. A button to mark the petition as URGENT which will add a parseable <star><star> URGENT<star><star> (<star> = *)to the header of the petition so our post-processing tools (aka gmbot) can forward/poke outside the game. (This is important!) 5. Before the petition is finished there should be a preview to check everything again, to make last changes. 6. As long as the petition is unassigned the button shows “claim”, once claimed the button shows “release” to unassign the petition again.
Request from FS#3092 :
“In the GM petition window, there should be a button ‘Guidelines for petitioning’ and when you click it, it gives just that. Guidelines for petitioning.
I recently filed a petition and didn’t know what to include, what was superfluous, whether it was too long winded or not, etc.”
Request from FS#3101 :
“We need enhanced petition system to allow adding several notes and note titles, as well as ability to review closed petitions. The ability to add several notes to a petition would also help us handle an issue, then log off, but leave notes for other GM’s to review what we have done and pick up / complete.”
|
|
Feature Request | 2956 | No | Combat | Medium | New | Orgonwukh | Davide Vescovini | Combat system calibration | 19.04.2010 | | |
Task Description
Combat system calibration
Short version:
I propose that in general the amount of damage dealt by any weapon or magic spell should decrease with the distance from the attacker to the target. Also, fast weapons should generally deal less damage than slow weapons. The combat system including both weapons and magic has to be more balanced.
Elaborated version:
Damage (D):
This is the amount of health points subtracted when an single attack is successful. Examples for magic are:
For weapons one has to include the levels and stats of attacker and target. As a reference I determine both attacker and target to have maxed stats and levels, full heavy armour equipped and to use two weapons at a time in bloody stance. The weapon damage is the average damage including the failed attacks. One could either ask a dev to look this up in the database or do a numberof attacks and measure the arithmetic mean. For convenience I determine the damage of short swords to be 500 HP. This value is not the value specified in the weapons properties, but the “real” damage dealt.
Maximum attack distance (MAD):
This is the maximum distance from which an attack can be made. MAD can be measured in game units (the values you get if you type /pos). One unit should be about 0.5 metres. Examples for magic and weapons are:
Attack speed (AS):
This is the time in seconds (s) between the starting of the attack and the moment when the damage is dealt. Examples:
Damage per second (DPS):
This is simply D divided by AS.
Effective Damage (ED):
I propose to let the DPS decrease linearly with the MAD. I introduce a factor (F) with which you can put more or less emphasis on the distance weighting. Based on the above assumed value of damage for short swords, I propose that the ED with a value of 500 should be used to weight all weapons and magic attack spells:
ED=F*(D/AS)*MAD=500 or ED=F*DPS*MAD=500
For F=1 this simply is
ED=(D/AS)*MAD=500 or ED=DPS*MAD=500.
Let us fix F=1 here for now for convenience. If my proposal for weighting is too daring or too conservative, we still can talk about setting a different value for F.
What does this mean?
Let us look at the weapons first and assume that the values for short sword are as I wrote above: AS=2, MAD=2 and D=500. Then DPS=250. This short sword deals an average damage of 250 HP per second. Since MAD=2, ED=500 HP. I have nothing to object concerning these values. This is my reference for the calibration of other weapons or magic spells from now on (see below).
Let us look at the spells: With a short sword you deal an average damage of 250 HP per seconds from a max. distance of 2 units. With Summon Missile you deal a damage of 100 HP per second from a max. distance of 57 units. With Flying Rocks you deal a damage of 225 HP per second from a max. distance of 74 units. Is that fair? Does it make sense that more damage can be dealt from a safe distance? This “unfairness” is reflected in the ED values of the spells:
We notice that the value of ED is way higher for spells than for the short sword. Flying Stones also have a very high MAD and hence a high ED value. If we assume that my proposal is appropriate for evaluation of the power of weapons and magic, this means that Summon missile is 7.4 times more powerful than using short swords and Flying Stones is 33.3 times more powerful than short swords. I think that is quite a realistic reflection of the current state
Calibration
I propose to calibrate weapons and spells by setting the values of D, AS and MAD in a way that the ED is about the same for all of them. In case we use the short sword for a reference, we could adjust the values for Summon Missile and Flying Stones by reducing the MAD, for example To do this we solve the equation for ED in regards to MAD:
MAD=500*AS/D
Then the values for the calibrated spells would be:
If you think this attack range is too low, there is the possibility to calibrate the spells by setting the damage after solving the equation for ED in regards to D:
D=AS*500/MAD
Then the values would be:
It is also possible to calibrate the AS with AS=D*MAD/500. You can also try out different trade offs between D, AS and MAD as long as ED=500. As long as the ED is the same for all weapons and spells, the relation between damage dealt per second and the attack range is maintained.
Calibration will also be helpful once the attack range for weapons is implemented. Let us examine the calibration of the broad sword and let us assume that this sword has a damage value of D=750:
So the attack range is the same while the attack speed and damage differ. One might think that it is more important to increase the attack range instead of the damage because of the bigger size of the broad sword. So let us assume that the damage value for the broad sword is D=600:
This seems to me an appropriate representation of the differences between the weapons: A broad sword has a longer range and deals more damage, but is slower than a short sword.
Final notes
This is a proposal for balancing the combat system. All values of weapons and magic are either estimations or assumptions. Feel free to provide the true values, if possible. Since the ezpcusa server exists, this might be a good opportunity to try such a system out. My assumptions about the levels, stats, armour and weapon properties of attacker and target are subjective and should be discussed.
Limitations:
Maxed levels were assumed, the properties of lower lever levels are unknown to me. But when known, those levels can be calibrated as well. I did not include the amount of mana needed for the spells yet. A simple rule could be to have a linear relationship between damage dealt and mana used (maybe 1 to 10, so you can still kill a 800 HP opponent with 222 mana, which is the maximum at the moment as far as i know). While the attack area of spells is a circle with a radius of AD (you just have to be closer than AD, facing direction is disregarded) while the target is in the centre of the circle, the area for weapons is much smaller because the attacker has to face the target. It should be something similar to a triangle. This disadvantage of weapons is not accounted for here. On the other hand, it is assumed that a spell caster casts spells as fast as possible. This disadvantage is not accounted for here, either. If those differences between weapons and spells is considered too big, you can think about setting F to another value than 1 for an appropriate weighting. Once spells and weapons are calibrated, prices should as well be calibrated. You could either raise the weapon training costs or lower the magic training costs. Maybe doing both is a good idea.
Advantages:
Using this calibration, it is possible to design various weapons and spells which are different concerning D, AS and MAD, but they are weighted in a more appropriate way than it is the case now. Your choice of weapons is based on what you prefer: range, damage, speed or a weighting/combination of them. Combat can be balanced and become more interesting once players fight each other with different properties of their weapons and attack style. The work for the devs is small. You need to change a single value for each weapon and spell.
Link to corresponding forum thread: http://www.hydlaaplaza.com/smf/index.php?topic=35352.0
|
|
Feature Request | 3081 | No | GM System | Very Low | New | Rizin | | Teleport Mod (Or Event) | 28.06.2022 | | |
Task Description
Possible addition of the ability to teleport all PC’s enrolled in an event at once to avoid accidentally grabbing a passer by with the area option.
|
|
Feature Request | 3553 | No | Engine | Medium | New | Pascal Detrait | | Idea proposition for Drawing skill | 16.02.2010 | | |
Task Description
Hi,
the Drawing skill is not yet available. I propose the following idea for developpers :
Each save could rise the skill experience
Each new created sketch could rise the skill experience, significatively more than the save function
Each rank could rise the number of allowed element in the sketch
Each "special" rank (defined by developpers) reached could allow new elements (ie. curves defined by 3 points, new icons, symbols, legend, several pages in the same map ...)
Best regards
Pascal Detrait
|
|
Bug Report | 3684 | No | Inventory/Items | Medium | | Seytra | Suilensh | NPCs don't accept split stacks traded | 11.01.2010 | | |
Task Description
When an NPC wants more than one item, but you have the items in different slots (even containers, like when your inventory is full and you can’t easily make room for the full stack), the trade won’t complete, even if the total sum of all items traded is the right amount. It should not matter if you give an NPC a stack of 63 items or ten stacks of ten items plus one of three, or seven of nine( ), etc..
Edit: they also don’t get given the items when they’re in the right amount but in different stacks / sacks in the inventory. One gets “You have to give manually, because you got too many items” instead. /Edit
|
|
Feature Request | 3835 | No | GUI | Medium | New | bonifarz | | Value of goods in trade window | 03.10.2022 | | |
Task Description
I would like to suggest an additional widget in the trade window that gives the total (NPC-trade) value of the goods offered, similar to the one for total tria offered. With the quality based pricing system, this could help to lower confusion and make trade and economy flourish. The obvious but neglectable downside is that players could abuse this to identify an enchanted items value without finding an NPC merchant. A solution to that problem could be found when thinking about a feature to identify such items (based on intelligence, dweomer detection, factions with merchants or whatever).
|
|
Bug Report | 4191 | No | Quests Dynamics | High | New | RlyDontKnow | | npc synonym musn't occur in a trigger | 12.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
if an npc synonym occurs in a quest trigger, it'll break that trigger because incoming messages will be replaced by the more_general value while the trigger still expects synonym. therefore the quest parser should refuse such quests as they're obviously broken or at least throw a warning about such occurrences.
|
|
Bug Report | 4221 | No | Tools | High | Assigned | RlyDontKnow | TaladAngela | missing Terms of Service | 05.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
there aren’t any terms of service on the website and consistently the user doesn’t have to agree to them at any point.
this is a big issue in my opinion as the user isn’t strictly bound to such terms and therefore cannot be accordingly punished in case he’s causing really bad issues.
|
|
Feature Request | 4256 | No | Quests | Medium | Assigned | mickra | JayRuaanAlison ColemankatuRon WhitbySemutaradrJack | Tilavi is in trouble, option request | 05.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
The quest objective is to help a certain NPC find a missing object, that's what my char agreed to do. After finding the object and proceeding to final steps I suddenly receive a ready-made line "X listens to your story" and find my char spilling its friend and ally's whereabouts to X, with me having absolutely no means to prevent or stop it. Honest, it feels like being godmodded by the quest system and is awfully disappointing, to say the least. It also clashes with the general idea of quests being done ICly.
Dear Devs, please add a "not squealing" option, something like "I've just found it somewhere" and let the player deal with one of the main ingame alignments (Law) according to that player's RP. The way it is done now, it's not C&C, it's M&C, having to bear with consequences of the game mechanics, and somehow it doesn't feel right… at all.
PS Ver: 0.5.3
(Edited for clarity.)
|
|
Bug Report | 4369 | No | Sound | Medium | Assigned | | Mathias | Sound Bugs Effects/Spells/Etc | 14.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
List of all bugs regarding sound to be fixed for next release.
|
|
Feature Request | 4448 | No | Engine | Medium | Unconfirmed | Stefan | | Random Spawn zones: NPC often spawn in mid air | 02.03.2011 | | |
Task Description
NPC in random spawn zones often spawn in mid air. It would be nice if they could be hidden until they hit the ground. Don’t send the NPC pos info to the client until it has stopped falling down?
|
|
Bug Report | 4484 | No | Engine | Medium | Could not Verify | Jon | | Unable to pick up quest item when inventory full. | 17.12.2020 | | |
Task Description
I was trying to do the Jolik’s Letter quest. My inventory was full when he handed me the letter, and I dropped. By the time I dropped something from my inventory, the letter was gone. Now I am stuck on this quest.
May be related to bug 3712 .
|
|
Bug Report | 4505 | No | Engine | Medium | New | CXDamian | | buddy command - toggle behavior | 12.06.2010 | | |
Task Description
friends list does not display all friends after using command line without add/remove(onoff), may remove other entries.
starting with no friends:
‘/buddy abcdef’ = ‘abcdef is already on your buddy list’ (refresh friends window, abcdef was added)
‘/buddy abcdefgh’ = ‘abcdefgh is not on your buddy list’ (refresh friends window, abcdef is no longer listed, abcdefgh is not listed)
‘/buddy abcdef add’ = sometimes added, sometimes not
|
|
Feature Request | 4513 | No | User Interface | Medium | New | Mario Rohkrämer | | Combat ratings in /targetinfo should mention a defense ... | 07.06.2010 | | |
Task Description
It is only partially helpful to estimate if an opponent is more or less stronger than my own char, as long as I don't estimate its defensive qualities too. I would like to see a pair of chances to get hurt by it, and chances to be able to hurt it. Especially since some oppoments are so well armored that even "Extraordinary" quality crafted weapons won't do any damage as long as the character has only average weapon skills. And it is quite vital to estimate the chance of breaking the armor before starting a fight. Even if the opponent is "about as strong as" the character, it is not just risky but suicidal if the opponent is the only one which has any chance to hurt.
|
|
Feature Request | 4519 | No | User Interface | Very Low | Unconfirmed | Kaerli Stronwylle | | Cannot have multiple windows of one type open at the sa... | 08.06.2010 | | |
Task Description
This is most limiting when trying to juggle multiple containers (such as the furnace and the stock casting) at once.
|
|
Bug Report | 4603 | No | Characters Animation | Low | New | Sen | | Odd enkif sneak animation | 09.02.2013 | | |
Task Description
The sneak animation of Fenkis is broken since.. I think years now. After trying out the new cool transparent-feature while sneaking looked it to me like the Menki one is broken, too? (fixed) Anyway, already the broken Fenki animation looks a bit annoying :P (It looks like side-stepping while walking)
Sen
|
|
Bug Report | 4608 | No | Character Textures | Low | Assigned | Mario Rohkrämer | Talad | Hiding in Shadows does not affect all body parts equall... | 10.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
There are models where body parts don’t get translucent while sneaking.
One example: Klyros wings.
(Wait for more to be collected…)
|
|
Bug Report | 4692 | No | Pets | Medium | New | Aljuvialle | Anders Reggestad | can't move after unmount pet | 09.04.2013 | | |
Task Description
after you'd exhausted to move while riding, and you've unmounted and dismissed your pet, you can't move until client restart.
How to reproduce: 1. mount your pet 2. ride on it while you exhausted to move 3. run shortcut:
/unmount
/pet ID, dismiss
4. you see your physical stamina is full and you can't sit or move anywhere.
PS: if you is not exhausted to move, this bug not occurs.
|
|
Feature Request | 4727 | No | NPC | Medium | New | RlyDontKnow | | Rentable mounts | 12.09.2010 | | |
Task Description
FR by Vakachehk:
I have an idea for mounts which will need some changes to some maps. For Rivnaks (maybe Drifters too) having stables in which without a ring you may summon them, and dismiss them, without any skill of any ring needed, maybe a tria fee of like 50trias every summon/dismiss (of course there's the obvious issue you un-mount and leave your Rivnak somewhere, either the game automatically dismisses it or it is able to be stolen via a player, or a mechanical guard comes and takes it back to the stable or whatever). Using your Ring of Summon Familiar you can use the skill Empathy to dismiss/summon/etc, anywhere at any time. Also I was thinking about the skill 'Riding' maybe this could be trainable and used in combat while on your rivnak?
|
|
Bug Report | 4735 | No | Setting | Medium | New | weltall | | npc with - | 01.10.2010 | | |
Task Description
The engine code was clearly coded to not allow - so till a different decision is taken these npc are all bugged and should have the - stripped
Brintec Dev-Onni Vladovic Chel-Astra Sharven Xant-Areth Uri Djho-Maat
thanks to Vakachehk for the list
|
|
Bug Report | 4771 | No | Quests | Very Low | Assigned | Luzino | drJack | Inconsistent use of you/ye in Lorytia's Clan quest | 09.07.2011 | | |
Task Description
In the quest Lorytia Starhammer and the Clan reunion Lorytia mostly uses "ye" instead of "you". But the use is not consistent throughout the quest. You'd think that if she regularly says "ye" she'd not switch to "you" for a sentence or two in between, sometimes even switching back and forth within one sentence.
f.e.: "That is very kind; I thank you. Here is the note: just tell him I sent you."
"Oh, I am sorry, you are still here… do you want to hear what happened?"
"I know ye worked very hard on your piece for the competition and you should have won. I take full responsibility for shortchanging you on the scores."
"He may have some means to get them prepared for you, but ye might make your journey faster if you have them on hand."
There might be more later in the quest, but I'm not done yet.
|
|
Feature Request | 4789 | No | User Interface | Medium | New | Frederik Elwert | | action locations have no labels and are not selectable | 16.10.2010 | | |
Task Description
The grill in Reffitia's kitchen in Brado's tavern doesn't behave like other items in the kitchen: The preparation table, for example, is selectable and has a label. The grill is not selectable, and it has no label. One can interact with the grill (e.g., store something in it) just as with the preparation table by right-clicking it. But the grill is much harder to identify, since it has no label.
|
|
Bug Report | 4809 | No | Engine | Medium | Unconfirmed | mike loeven | | cannot defend yourself if another player engages the mo... | 01.01.2013 | | |
Task Description
i ran into a bug that nearly got me killed today. i was fighting gobbles and i ran low on health and had to run away. as i was running another player cast flame burst on the gobble chasing me.
the gobble chasing me did not stop chasing me but i was no longer able to attack it because it said i must be grouped with X mean while the gobble was still damaging me.
this can be fixed one of 2 ways. the targeted player always has kill rights on the monster or the monster changes it’s target when a new playr engages it.
but as it stands it is rather scary when your being attacked and cannot defend yourself due to a bug in the kill stealing prevention system.
|
|
Bug Report | 4831 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | Unconfirmed | aurelynt | | Wrong message when paying a NPC using a dialog box whil... | 27.11.2010 | | |
Task Description
In a quest paying a NPC through a dialog box while having no money results in the following message: "<npc> does not need that". That seems wrong.
|
|
Bug Report | 4854 | No | Map Textures | Low | New | aurelynt | | Sky texture not correctly mapped to skydomes | 18.12.2010 | | |
Task Description
The skybox texture doesn’t seem to be correctly scaled to the skyboxes. Its borders are cropped and this results in very sharp and somewhat odd skylines:
PS 0.5.5
|
|
Feature Request | 4882 | No | Pets | Low | Unconfirmed | Firiban | | ride other people's mounts | 08.11.2022 | | |
Task Description
Hi, it would be nice if you could lend/rent your mount to other people. This could be made with a dialog box that appears when someone wants to /mount the pet (”Foo wants do ride your pet NameofThePet, allow?”), similar to challenges/trades. If this is implemented there should of cause be auto-accept/deny.
|
|
Bug Report | 4937 | No | Combat | Medium | New | Daniel | | Movement for Ranged not showing when firing long distan... | 04.04.2016 | | |
Task Description
When the monster is somewhat near you, the movement simulating firing an arrow with the bow is showing. However if the monster is quite far away the movement stops showing until either one of you gets closer to the other.
|
|
Bug Report | 5099 | No | Models and Maps | Very Low | New | Mario Rohkrämer | Talad | guildlaw: Paragraph symbols are mirrored | 19.03.2011 | | |
Task Description
The paragraphs ‘§’ on the walls of the guild house map “guildlaw” are mirrored. For years already (just always forgot to report it).
|
|
Bug Report | 5173 | No | Quests | Very Low | Postponed | Resildren | drJack | Master in the Circle Way quests | 22.12.2013 | | |
Task Description
Upon completion of the without a way quests ( In my case Crystal Way ) govell sends me to Levrus log:
[NPC] Govell Mihdren says: This will prove the mastery you gained in the Crystal Way. (06:14:52) [NPC] Govell Mihdren says: Make a good use of it, Resildren. (06:14:55) [NPC] Govell Mihdren says: And take this. (06:14:58) [NPC] Govell Mihdren hands you an amulet. (06:15:00) [NPC] Govell Mihdren says: Bring it to Levrus, one final lesson awaits you there.
but Levrus will not accept it, to make sure I completed my leveling (200) and returned, and he will still not accept it?
I’ve talked to other masters of the other ways and this seems to be a global problem, is this just not implemented yet, or is it a bug?
|
|
Feature Request | 5191 | No | Models and Maps | Medium | New | Viken | | More sewers would be nice... | 21.05.2011 | | |
Task Description
I really like the sewers in Hydlaa, and I think it’d be cool if the other cities (Ojaveda and Amdeneir, mainly) had something like that. I also think it’d be cool if the Hydlaa sewers had a couple more openings, and maybe some intentional service entrances instead of just cave-ins with ladders… And maybe an entrance/exit in the East? Then my Rogue-like character could travel by sewers more, which would be totally awesome.
Are you guys planning to add some more sewers eventually?
|
|
Bug Report | 5204 | No | Bugtracker | Medium | Unconfirmed | Shinobu Maehara | | When receiving a bugtracker account, a non-existing ver... | 02.12.2021 | | |
Task Description
When I received the account confirmation message in my inbox, and then clicked on the link, it asked for a verification code. But there was no textbox to enter the code, and it wasn’t in the message sent. Fortunately the login turned out to work just the same - all mention of verification codes should be scrapped.
|
|
Bug Report | 5213 | No | Character Creation | Medium | New | Ralph Campbell | | don't hardcode race to set gender in pawscharcreatemain... | 16.05.2011 | | |
Task Description
Index: src/client/gui/pawscharcreatemain.cpp
— src/client/gui/pawscharcreatemain.cpp (revision 7252) +++ src/client/gui/pawscharcreatemain.cpp (working copy) @@ -1012,10 +1012,9 @@
view->Show();
view->EnableMouseControl(true);
- //temporary hardcoding needs removal - maleButton→SetEnabled(id != 9); - femaleButton→SetEnabled(id != 9); - if(id==9) + maleButton→SetEnabled(currentGender != PSCHARACTER_GENDER_NONE); + femaleButton→SetEnabled(currentGender != PSCHARACTER_GENDER_NONE); + if (currentGender == PSCHARACTER_GENDER_NONE)
{
maleButton->SetState(false);
femaleButton->SetState(false);
|
|
Feature Request | 5216 | No | NPC | Medium | Unconfirmed | mickra | | Visual indication of available quests | 20.05.2011 | | |
Task Description
When a player character is within the interaction range of an NPC, a mark (label) of some sort should appear above that NPC if they are offering some new or repeatable quests (! not some information for those already running !) for that particular character at that particular moment.
Should be optional as a turn-off or turn-on, depending on the default chosen by designers. In any case, and as with any other label, players should retain the option of not seeing it, if it spoils their fun or ruins their immersion somehow.
The reason for this request: drastically increased amount of questing chains ingame, and the absolutely unhealthy and immersion-breaking amount of mouse-clicking on the same NPCs the game now requires.
Noticing a sign above someone's head is OOC, of course, but clicking a mouse button on someone's model, or getting an aggressive red "…has no quest information for you" line floating in mid-air is equally OOC'ish. On the other hand, seeing no mark above someone's head would cause neither irritation nor disappointment (while futile mouse-targeting and mouse-clicking, when done repeatedly, invariably produces both of those negative effects). The marks would also provoke reasonable curiousity about available quests, hopefully enticing new players into doing more of them.
I know this request is somewhat of a long shot, but assuming that the engine is going to be considerably revisited this summer, I decided to submit it anyway.
[Edited for clarity, and also to separate it more from PS#4798. That older one would 'make the game easier' indeed, while what I suggest would only eliminate excessive mouse actions.]
|
|
Feature Request | 5221 | No | Engine | Medium | Assigned | Viken | Venalan | Making Metal Stock in Ojaveda | 18.09.2014 | | |
Task Description
I just did this quest, and it turned out to basically be “Give Trasok 100 tria so he can explain what you should already know if you have the book.” It has no reward other than a few Crafting Association points, which is pretty much worthless. Could you guys either remove this quest or make it give some real rewards? Thanks…
|
|
Bug Report | 5242 | No | Crafting | Medium | New | nobody special | | blade can be removed from hand without disturbing work | 24.05.2011 | | |
Task Description
If you take a heated blade out of your hand while hammering it the work will not be interrupted until the work duration if finished. If you return it to your hand before the work is finished the transformation completes successfully. THis appears to only work if you replace the item with itself, substituting a different identical item or a completely different item causes an interruption.
|
|
Bug Report | 5271 | No | Movement | Medium | Unconfirmed | Vakachehk | | Amdeneir Tavern bed's Canopy too low to use | 09.07.2011 | | |
Task Description
The bed’s canopys in Amdeneir tavern are too low for anyone/race to use the beds.
Picture depicting Vakachehk being to tall to get under the bed canopy
You might be able to use them if we could some how have a lying down command and be able to scoot over. Or right click the bed and click ‘Use’ and our character’s automatically lay on the beds. However they’re unusable at the moment.
|
|
Feature Request | 5286 | No | Inventory/Items | Medium | Unconfirmed | Greg | | Pile of quest items Of Unknown Importance | 23.06.2011 | | |
Task Description
Not sure if this was adressed but I have a pile of quest items, that after the whipe Of quests Im not sure what I need to keep for Quest trees, or what I can get rid of. Trying to clean out my inventory/Quest items.
I Haven’t really tried to find a spoiler site that lists quest items and what they are for, or even if one exists
|
|
Bug Report | 5289 | No | Combat | Medium | Unconfirmed | Greg | Davide Vescovini | You Must Face Enemy To Attack/You Are To Far Away To at... | 24.06.2011 | | |
Task Description
Not sure if it is just me but I keep getting “You Must Face Enemy To Attack” when im clearly faceing them >
There are A few Angles At which this happens (Most noticable on a Armored Riverling's right shoulder near the Lake Of Tears, Has also happened on the consumors near the Face Of Stone)
“You Are To Far Away To Attack” > (standing right next to them, If I time it right I can jump and hit it’s head, but only can hit when jumping)
I have noticed this On Ojaveda Road 1 Maulbernauts/Vilenaut/Maulberloards (When they spawn in the "vally area of there spawn points") I also notice when I kill them They get suspended Laying down in the air
|
|
Feature Request | 5300 | No | Quests | Medium | Unconfirmed | Andrew Draskoy | | Suggestion for NPC default conversation when quests not... | 29.08.2011 | | |
Task Description
Currently when an NPC doesn't have a quest for player, they essentially ignore the player. This can be bad because:
1) Sometimes (e.g. the circle way quests) this comes across as a bug since the player has been directed to talk to the NPC by another.
2) It's not always (in fact generally not) a realistic behaviour from a charactization PoV.
3) The chain quests are now very long and not obvious, so players have no idea what to do next.
4) It may be something else besides more quests that is necessary. How are players to know?
I think this should be changed, and propose the following dynamic as a possibility:
A "sociability" metric would be calculated for each interaction between player and NPC based on: factions, prerequisites required for quests, and a base number assigned to each NPC. This metric will indicate how well-disposed the NPC is towards giving quest info the player at this time. Depending on this metric (lets say a number from 0-5) the NPC could say something (or ignore the player if the number is 0). The higher the number, the more useful and specific is the response.
Some characters are grumpy by nature and will almost always ignore people or give gruff responses (like now). Many are just typical and will offer canned default responses, expect that for the higher metrics these will hint that they will have something for you later. Ideally the highest metric will look up who gives the pre-requisite quest and direct you there.
Each quest could specify overrides for any of the responses.
|
|
Bug Report | 5316 | No | Crashes | Medium | Unconfirmed | sly | | client is crashing | 04.04.2013 | | |
Task Description
My client is crashing when my char sees a Magic Wand user. I’m on a Mac. I suppose its caused by those new Master Wands. This is very nasty…
|
|
Bug Report | 5324 | No | Engine | Medium | Unconfirmed | R.Guppy | | Outside guildhouse door icons missing | 27.07.2011 | | |
Task Description
Both guildhouses Call of Destiny and The Jumping Groffels, show no door icons from outside.
|
|
Bug Report | 5328 | No | Models and Maps | Low | Unconfirmed | Mario Rohkrämer | | Chest model uses an outdated texture | 18.07.2011 | | |
Task Description
The currently used texture “chest.dds” does not match the UV map of the model for the “Chest” item (animated chest, repeatedly opening and closing).
None of the present textures are compatible to this model.
Either create a matching texture, or replace the model by a supported one.
|
|
Bug Report | 5359 | No | Rendering Issues | Medium | New | Phenha Phayethor | | Klyros colour change | 13.11.2011 | | |
Task Description
I play a Grey Klyros male and after I got my robes I noticed that if I put them on and took them back off, my arms became blue. This is an easy bug to recreate, all it requires is a grey klyros and a robe.
|