|
Bug Report | 7989 | No | Crafting Transformations | Medium | Unconfirmed | Daevaorn | | Extremely unrealistic drop in crafting quality (Jewelry... | 02.01.2024 | | |
Task Description
With
- a skill level of 218 (i.e. 186 natively)7 - an unpolished speciment of Q300 to work on
I created a final result for an enchanted gold necklace of Q126
This is an extremly unrealistic random outcome.
|
|
Bug Report | 7991 | No | Quests | Medium | Unconfirmed | Tutharel | | when completing a quest with a "choose your reward" sec... | 05.01.2024 | | 1 |
Task Description
when completing a quest with a “choose your reward” section at the end, if you don’t select a reward before clicking “Select a reward” it doesn’t stop you before continuing or give you a default reward, it just completes without giving you any of the possible rewards.
When a friend completed the “Levrus Rat Eyes” quest, she forgot to select a reward before clicking “Select a reward” and received none of the options given.
|
|
Bug Report | 7993 | No | Quests | Medium | Ready to test | Daevaorn | | Dialog option broken in "Repentance" / Keen Edge chain ... | 11.03.2024 | | |
Task Description
The quest option advised by Sharven (”[…] HE has decided […]”) is correctly presented by the interaction menu,
but on selection it is not recognised by Roniston (”[…] You could ask me to tell you about something, perhaps?”)
Quest progression is thereby blocked the Keen Edge chain broken again (after yesterday’s fix of “Slimy Doubt”).
|
|
Bug Report | 8002 | No | Crafting | Medium | Ready to test | Daevaorn | | Auto-prepare picking impossible container | 11.01.2024 | | |
Task Description
While preparing Terevan Berry Wine Saauce (as part of Octarch’s Delight) The “Prepare” button picks either mortar and pestle as the container to be used or the wooden bowl, depending on where my character is standing (in Reffitia’s Kitchen).
Both are too small to hold all items that are needed to combine “Unmixed Terevan Berry Wine Sauce”. Maybe container size should be a criterion more than distance.
|
|
Bug Report | 8009 | No | Crafting Transformations | Medium | Unconfirmed | Malunga Leeboo | | "Prepare" button does not appear for an existing combin... | 04.05.2024 | | |
Task Description
Once you creating alchemy components which assume various combinations, like Air Essence (cerating Frost Arangma Essence Mix OR rectifying Mix of corroded Riverling Bones) AND you have a “Riverling” set of ingredients in your inventory, the “Check Prerequisites” button displays “Frost Arangma Essence Mix: Missing 1” and “Prepare” button does not appear. Because it is listed first and no further check is happening. My suggestion is to add checkboxes or radio-buttons to recipes like these in order to help “Check Prerequisites” button detect existing set correctly.
|
|
Feature Request | 696 | No | Inventory/Items | Low | Assigned | Roland Schulz | TaladRoland Schulz | Icon for disabled items | 19.10.2012 | | |
Task Description
With trunk, equipped items whose requirements are not met at the moment are disabled (old bt #2618). There should be a visual indication of this in the inventory view. Quote:
—– Posted by ThomPhoenix at 3:45 PM on 12-02-2007 —– Yes, perhaps the art team can make a translucent PNG with a big red cross on it and this one can be overlayed on your equipped item’s icon. That would show that your item is not working. Perhaps something more subtle can be made too, although a red cross would be clear.
|
|
Feature Request | 705 | No | | Low | New | Caarrie | | more options with /morph | 03.03.2009 | | |
Task Description
feature request to have more options to morph to. GMs are not able to change face when they morph or any other option in character creation.
skin hair face etc
|
|
Feature Request | 881 | No | Crafting Transformations | Low | New | O | Frank BartonRizinAngelaDavide Vescovini | Animal parts economy | 14.11.2023 | | 11 |
Task Description
I would suggest a specific hunting skill to “loot” animals instead of the current lottery system giving hides, claws, eyes, and whatnot.
Currently, anybody who can kill something can get enough parts by slaughtering a big amount of creatures. The skill would clearly separate the warriors from the hunters. Anyone can probably cut a rat’s tail, but skinning the animal is a bit more complex. And so on, some beasts will be more difficult to skin than others. Even proper meat is not obvious to extract from a carcass.
As a side effetc, maybe a killer could carry back the entire beast to a person capable of skinning/cutting it, if he doesn’t have the skill himself (it looks like some people can carry 400 kgs out there).
This incidentally could create a real market between players, akin to the economy currently existing around ore and weapons. Obviously, some PCs are going to be cooks, leatherworkers or alchemists.
This of course doesn’t apply to looting rogues, unless one can think of using human parts in some dark alchemy, or just carrying ears or heads as trophies.
|
|
Feature Request | 1022 | No | | Low | New | durwyn | | Ability to lock the guildhouse from the inside. | 04.04.2011 | | 3 |
Task Description
When i first enter in the guild house, i inspected the arounds to remember what i had already seen in the pasts months , the pics and so :}
But i was disappointed by the fact that i cant close the door :( i mean by the inside.. i take the example that one of my guildmate invited her husband in it but then she had to go out to lock the door and enter it again. (OMG she can enter even if its locked! wOw hehe ^^)
Maybe its planed but then i have no possibility to check if its or not :}
|
|
Feature Request | 1135 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Loyni | | use /tell with alias names | 05.07.2009 | | |
Task Description
It would be nice to use alias names from buddy list for /tell command. e.g name: full_char_name, alias: Loyni. /tell Loyni [text] could be translated itnernally to /tell full_char_name [taxt].
|
|
Feature Request | 1506 | No | Combat | Low | New | Thom | | Non-lethal guild wars. | 24.01.2010 | | 10 |
Task Description
From forum thread http://hydlaa.com/smf/index.php?topic=32393.0
In normal duels you can decide whether to kill your opponent or not, leaving him with 1 HP. However, in a guild war this is not the case, in a guild war you can only fight to the death. Make it so that fighters in a guild war have the possibility to spare an opponent. This could be done by creating an option when starting a guild war: lethal war or non-lethal where the fighters can decide to spare an opponent or not.
|
|
Feature Request | 1558 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Arerano Areramau | | chat tabs: "Emotions" or "fighting Messages" should be ... | 12.09.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
split "emotions" or "fighting messages" from "system base" so that one can have "fighting" in "System-Tab" but "emotes" in "Main-Tab".
Right now you can chose which "Messages" go to "Main Tab" and which not (System Tab). But both "Emotes" and "Fighting Messages" are part of "System Base", thus you can either have both, or none of them in Main. And being spammed with "Fighting Messages" during RP is quite annoying. Indeed, you could filter them out - but that's not the same since you won't get those messages at all then.
|
|
Feature Request | 1590 | No | Inventory/Items | Low | New | Electricsheep | | Trade between players should be visible to all in sight... | 24.01.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
How about making it visible in Main if Players exchange items? A system message appears to the ones trading anyways at this moment. the message to others should however have some less precision, like:
"<PlayerA> gave <PlayerB> Weapons and some coinage in exchange for raw materials"
for someone trading a crafted longsword, a dagger, 2 hexa and a tria against 45 platinum ore and a silver ingot.
this in order to keep realism (can all see how many circles and tria he pushed into the other persons hand?) the message could use the item_category, and eliminate doubles, so it could be done without giant changes to the database.
the advantages I would see in this:
1.) there will be visible interaction between players. no more pure tell-based sales that (imho) are pretty ooc.
Noone IRL (and especially not in the middle ages) would go into a shop and whisper in the cashiers ear what he whishes to sell or buy.
Instead people going into a shop (not a supermarket) usually say good day followed by a statement on what they seek to buy (maybe even some smalltalk).
Neither would such item exchange go unnoticed by other people in the shop or near the exchange.
So I think it would add to realism. Unless the character you play would be blind.
2.) Stealthy and sneaky exchanges of goods would have to take place in dark alleys, like sneaky things should be done.
3.) Hopefully the messages in main would encurage Players to take the general and casual trade-talk into main as well,
instead of hiding it in tells in order to not 'disturb' other players.
If IRL there are others talking near you, you step away a little to give and have more privacy as well.
4.) It also would surely add some spying capabilities into the game, as it then could indeed be seen to all around who trades with who.
This will make it possible to IC-ly spy on others trade behaviours. This without the need of having to be telling or grouping with the ones spied on.
disadvantages:
1.) Anyone could see who would trade with who, people who use quest runners would have to find a reason why they would get items for free..
(or take the trade to a dark alley).
2.) Someone could 'spam' the main-channel with trade messages. (but that's easier by sitting and standing up, or by dropping items and pick them up)
3.) some things I probably didn't thik about yet. feel free to add..
Overall I think it would rather add to RP then desturb it. For slipping items to others unnoticed, there could/should be a ‘/givesecret’ option that would use the numbers behind the pickpocket/sneaking skills.
|
|
Feature Request | 1600 | No | Engine | Low | Prospect Task | nobody special | | Door knocking | 26.02.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
I would like to have a Knock button added to guild house door context menu that would allow people to signal anyone inside that they have a visitor. THe knock command will send a “someone is knocking at the door” message to everyone inside. This could be used regardless of whether the door is locked.
It would certainly enhance role play regarding the guild houses.
|
|
Feature Request | 1760 | No | NPC | Low | New | Eric | Jay | NPC Consignment merchant | 16.03.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
The way it works now:
If I want to purchase a weapon that is better than those offered by NPCs (Trasok, Harnquist, etc) I must find someone who is capable of crafting the item I am looking for, which can be IC, but also find out when they are going to be online, which is OOC. I have spent more hours than I can count trying to find crafted items for sale in Hydlaa and Akkaio. It can be great for RP to have players sitting around doing nothing but selling their wares, but players are going to want to do something other than sit the entire time they are in-game, and there are not enough players to be available 24/7 or even a regular in-game 8-5.
The way it should work:
A specialized NPC character (class of characters) should be introduced that can do two things:
1. Hold items for sale. 2. Sell items that are held at a price specified by the original seller.
Desired Implementation example:
1. Crafter makes item and goes to merchant. 2. Crafter sets a price for item to be sold and removes it from his inventory.
a. this could be done via a specialized trade window/action button.
b. a seller should be able to remove an item that has not been sold (for a fee).
c. the seller should be able to change the asking price (for a fee).
3. The item then becomes available for sale to other players to purchase.
a. a action button and dialog would need to be created to search the merchants inventory.
b. the items listed should allow a description to be viewed (similar to current buy/sell dialog.
c. when an item is purchased it is removed from the merchants inventory.
4. The money would be taken from the buyer and either
1. placed on the merchant to be claimed by the seller any time after the item was sold (minus commission)
or
2. placed in a bank account (minus commission)
* Design consideration should be made for if each NPC merchant is self-contained, or if the NPC merchants know about the inventory of other merchants and can offer those items for sale (for a additional delivery fee) *
Justifications:
1. Players are not available 24/7. 2. All characters should not be crafters (not realistic for RP) 3. Economy would be much more realistic and less OOC as items would not be as difficult to buy/sell. 4. RP is not lost as a crafter can still sell their wares (with no fees) if they sell direct.
Steps to reproduce:
N/A
|
|
Feature Request | 1761 | No | | Low | New | Eric | | Items purchased by NPCs should be availabe for sale to ... | 27.09.2014 | | 3 |
Task Description
The way it works now:
I mine ore or get weapons drops from killing monsters and sell them to a NPC. These items then simply disappear into the ether.
The way it should work:
The items purchased by a NPC should be available for players to purchase, at a mark-up to what the NPC bought the item for.
Example, If I sell 20 Iron Ore to Trasok, then he should have 20 Iron Ore for sale.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Acquire an item that a NPC will purchase. 2. Open the buy/sell dialog with this merchant. 3. Notice that when in “buy” view there are no items in the appropriate category. 4. Sell the item in question. 5. Go back to the “buy” view and observe that there is still no itme for sale in that category.
Justifications:
1. The players/devs have expressed a desire in the forums to have a stable economy. This will help. 2. For RP, the prices should fluctuate depending on a very simplified supply/demand algorithm. 3. For RP, how can a merchant justify shelling out mountains of trias for items that never seem to get used.
a. Trasok shouldn't fit in his house with all the silver/gold ingots he has bought over the years.
4. This will help crafters be able to get raw materials at reasonable IC-justifiable prices and hopefully get prices for crafted items to be reasonable and IC-justifiable as well.
|
|
Feature Request | 1804 | No | | Low | New | Qia Fask | | Use of containers holding liquids is unrealistic (mugs,... | 06.07.2013 | | 2 |
Task Description
Mugs are a staple of RP for many people, but their use is currently quite unrealistic – you “drink” away a solid glass object.
What I proprose to fix this may not be purely realistic, but at least makes sense.
When an object is consumed, it should leave behind an “empty” (mug, potion bottle, jar, etc.) which will appear in the inventory. The cost of items which come in containers should be increased, as “deposit” or sorts, like when people buy pop or beer in real life. People would be able to sell the empty back to reclaim their deposit.
In the case of mugs of alcohol, they could be strewn about on the table as the drinking goes on, so people know who’s been drinking too much. There wouldn’t be any worry about “littering”, as there would always be someone willing to pick up after and return them to Allelia or Brado for the deposit money.
If this is implemented, it would also allow for future features like being able to return to Allelia or Brado for a “refill” without needing to pay the deposit. Same for potions and other items that are sold in containers.
Also the possibility of putting other liquids into the containers. It would be neat for example to be able to stop by the secret garden and fill up a bottle, mug or bucket with fresh water from the pool (it could be done by the usual right-click method on an object).
I feel these sorts of things would help improve the RP and realism a great deal.
|
|
Feature Request | 1985 | No | GM System | Low | Assigned | Caarrie | Aresilek Besolez | List of all GM feature requests [or dev lvl requests] | 15.07.2009 | | 1 |
Task Description
this bug has a list of all gm feature requests attached to make it easier to find them
|
|
Feature Request | 2022 | No | Bugtracker | Low | New | Adrián | | Bounties - Game feature plus GM Tool. | 01.01.2022 | | 1 |
Task Description
This idea came up in IRC.
When someone breaks a law, players can report it to GMs or another NPC guard. Then GMs or the guard activate an option that turns on the autoaccept duels for an hour, with a different color label. During that hour, players that find the outlaw can kill it (or people with X faction in guards), so that would involve some players acting like guards in town (and some outlaws would have to leave the city for some time to avoid being killed).
|
|
Feature Request | 2070 | No | User Interface | Low | Prospect Task | Caarrie | | ability to search by name for /item window | 24.01.2010 | | |
Task Description
the gm /item window has many items listed in it, it would be much easier if you could just type the name of the item needed and it would show you the 3d mesh and the icon as if you had found it in the catagory selection section. this is very helpful for trying to see what something looks like without having to spawn it. as more and more items start to be added to laanx less and less people will be able to use the /item window to find items and will use /item <name> instead but that is a waste if they just want to view an item and have no use for it.
|
|
Bug Report | 2132 | No | Inventory/Items | Low | New | Thom | | /giveitem and /takeitem "all" parameter only works on s... | 13.03.2010 | | |
Task Description
If you have 20 eggs in your inventory, split up in a stack of 19 and 1 separate, /giveitem Test all egg will only give the target 1 egg. You have to stack all eggs together for the command to work.
This also means that if a character has 3 swords stolen via an exploit, and a GM would use /takeitem Cheater all sword, only the stacks would be taken. So if the cheater had 2 swords in a stack and 1 separate, he would keep the separate sword.
|
|
Feature Request | 2189 | No | | Low | New | weltall | | [pawsillumination] zoom support when looking at sketche... | 01.09.2008 | | 1 |
Task Description
It would be nice if it was possible to zoom sketches when looking at them. This would also be useful when you get a sketch/map which is too big for your screen and allows you to have the entire image on screen by reducing zoom.
The included patch allows the user to zoom from 1/10 to 10x the map increasing the size of every element on screen. The buttons used for this are > and < if someone has a better suggestion about them or thinks that having the increase/decrease zoom on screen would be useful i could add them.
http://pastebin.ca/1189613
|
|
Feature Request | 2319 | No | | Low | New | | | Auto-Create Key For Lockable Container | 01.10.2008 | | |
Task Description
When using /item to create a lockable container, also create a key automatically and place it in the container.
At the every least, just create the (master?) key and put it in the new container.
More complex would be to alter the dialog to allow input of how many keys (in addition to master?) to auto-create.
|
|
Feature Request | 2349 | No | Engine | Low | New | | | Installation Shortcuts | 19.04.2010 | | |
Task Description
Since players rely heavily on log files, and since some files like saved books and screenshots are created by the client in various folders, could the installation package please create shortcuts to these folders in the start menu on windows, and whatever the equivelant is on other platforms? Would certainly make it easier for players to find them when they need them.
Also either set the psupdater shortcut to include the CheckIntegrity flag as default or create a second one with that flag.
|
|
Feature Request | 2435 | No | Sound | Low | | Mrokii | Mathias | Sound for receiving Tells or when ones name is mentione... | 05.04.2010 | | 4 |
Task Description
At the moment, there is no way to get a players attention if (s)he is not watching PS. I think there should be an extra sound (settable via options) that is played whenever somebody receives a tell and/or whenever somebody’s name is mentioned. Maybe these should even be two different settings in options.
|
|
Feature Request | 2436 | No | User Interface | Low | Prospect Task | Mrokii | | An obvious way to show a player's away/sleeping status | 28.06.2022 | | 4 |
Task Description
I have often experienced that people come close to my character, trying to interact with me without trying to use tell. So they do not get that I am actually away, they may just assume that I am or (in the worst case) think I am rude because I am ignoring them. So what is needed is a way to show another character the own away and-/or sleep-status. Though I am not quite sure which would be the best way to do so.
Here are some possibilities: - add “away” or “sleeping” to the players label when one moves the mouse over another character - This status should be shown always, no matter if the user has activated the display of name or name/guild in options. Or at least there should be an own setting for it, in case somebody absolutely do not want to know about this status. - To make it a bit more icly, don’t separate between “sleeping” (activated via “/sleep”) and “away”. In both cases use “sleeping” as a players status. - A possible extension could be to set auto-sleeping like on irc. Say, the user hasn’t done anything for half an hour, he is automatically set to “sleep”-status.
I think this would help to avoid confusion like what I described above.
Related to FS#2667
|
|
Feature Request | 2521 | No | | Low | Prospect Task | Eric | | Option to allow assistance in PvE without grouping | 28.07.2009 | | |
Task Description
I know this is around for some reason, but I think an option to turn this on and off would be better, as it does more bad than good, especially for roleplay. I was talking with someone new in the dungeon, next to an aggressive rogue which I just killed. When the rogue respawned, he went after the new player, and began pummeling him. I tried to intervene and “save” him, but couldn’t attack the rogue because of some magical red letter barrier yelling “I must be grouped with the player to attack”. I eventually tried to heal him, but wasn’t fast enough and he died while I stood there watching helplessly. Next time I’ll start with healing them, instead of trying to attack, group and communicate with the player as they are being attacked.
I’m not sure how many people go out there and try to “steal” other people’s monsters, but this is seriously annoying and unrealistic in the grand scheme of things. This has happened many times and has been tough to try to “save” anyone, so I thought an option to turn on and off to allow players to hoard monsters for themselves or share if they get into trouble. I suggest as a default, it should be allowable for new players. Delete this if it is a repost, couldn’t find anything on it.
Thanks!
|
|
Feature Request | 2532 | No | | Low | Prospect Task | O | | Read, unread, and updated books | 26.12.2009 | | 1 |
Task Description
I don’t spend my life in Jayose’s library. However, once in a while, I would go there and spend a couple of hours reading, looking for new books, sometimes refreshing my memory with older ones.
It would be nice if there was a way to quickly spot a book that one has already read. Maybe a (read) or (unread) mark after the title, or just a different colour for the title font, anything as see fit. A “read” flag would be set as soon as the book is open, to keep it simple, and of course it is the player’s responsibility to read the content. Ok, so far, you can tell me that it’s up to me to remember if I read something or not; even when hundreds of volumes will be available; yes, but…
It gets useful when a book is updated. If I do remember that I read a specific book, well, I’ll probably won’t read it again. Meanwhile, words may have been changed inside, following the inconsistencies hunt, world development, whatever… So, if all statuses are set back to “unread” for all players after a change (or from “read” to “updated” if you want to be more precise), we’ll know that we’d better read it again.
It can be a bit heavy on the database (flagging each book for each player), but at least it’s technically simple. Not to mention other uses you could come up with (quest requisites, statistics for the setting team, etc.)
Also, as Tontow suggested, the info can be stored on the client side instead of a database. To not lose the functionality of the “updated” flag, which is set on the server side, a last updated timestamp for each book is all that is needed on the server. Client side, the log starts empty (no book read). When opening a book, the log is updated (each time) with the book id (its name, I suppose) and the opening timestamp (server time, easier than GMT). When examining a shelf, books are marked according to the log info; thus, if the latest opening date is earlier than the book’s server timestamp, it appears as “updated”.
(Wish list reference: http://hydlaa.com/smf/index.php?topic=34222.0)
|
|
Feature Request | 2647 | No | | Low | New | Mario Rohkrämer | | PvP areas need an unmistakable warning | 08.10.2011 | | 5 |
Task Description
Until today I did not know that “Camp Banished” is a PvP area at all. Until I got killed.
I was asked by a GM “if I did not expect that”?! - No, I did not! I see everything as a roleplaying incentive, unless I get a system message warning me about changed world attributes.
This issue is “critical”, because inside this PvP area are quest relevant NPCs. Now, what would happen if you are in a quest dialog with an NPC, and get killed? - You would lose that quest. And if it was a one-time quest, you’ll lose it forever, for your char.
This almost happened to Cadwen today, whom I helped to deliver a “Keg of beer for Filch”. Fortunately the keg was not stolen while we returned from the Death Realm.
|
|
Bug Report | 2656 | No | Crafting Transformations | Low | Assigned | Caarrie | Davide VescoviniTuathanach | list of crafting bugs | 08.08.2014 | | |
Task Description
this bug will include any bug related to crafting.
|
|
Feature Request | 2667 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Timmeh | | Add [Away] tags to /who list | 28.06.2022 | | 3 |
Task Description
It would be convenient if you were to do a /who Timmothy and I had autoreply on it would return
Timmothy [Away] Guild
Currently, I find the /away command rather useless, as you’d have to /tell the person who’s away, not knowing for sure if they’re even away. But with it in the /who, you can find out if someone is away, then send a /tell to find out the reason/how long.
Related to FS#2436
|
|
Feature Request | 2721 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Andy | | Player shops - Trade functions for guarded items | 28.06.2022 | | 1 |
Task Description
Function to set a guarded item as sellable, with price.
/sellitem name price
Confirmation for sale, confirming price to purchaser. Confirmation text message/description in main when sale has occurred.
Would need at least a button visible in context menu to initiate sale. Set item for sale and price could be command-line, that’d still work.
|
|
Feature Request | 2777 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | New | weltall | Rizin | Shared Quests | 12.07.2009 | | |
Task Description
There should be a way for players in groups to share quests they are doing. So they could talk with others about them and do them together. All will get the quest complete when they complete the task given by the npc (and maybe a copy of the reward for each one): this could make quest allow players to socialize more. The biggest problems in implementation could be the case in which quests might overlap, the fact players might want to chose the quest they want to share and the variations which could be in dialogs when talking with a group of people versus a single one. The players will get the shared quests added automatically even if they didn’t have them provided they have the correct prerequisites
|
|
Feature Request | 2778 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | New | weltall | | Group Quests | 01.04.2010 | | |
Task Description
This is an entirely new class of quests where the person or persons who originally get the quest are asked to form a group to solve some more complicated task or martial challenge. Once the quest is completed each member can then “turn it in” or go to the originating NPC for a reward. Unlike shared quests, it will be impossible to finish grouped quests without the aid of other players. This is intended to promote teamwork and to give a more deep and realistic experience to players.
|
|
Feature Request | 2867 | No | GUI | Low | Assigned | Firiban | Joe Lyon | Display tabs only when neccessary | 22.09.2014 | | |
Task Description
Hi, to make the interface less confusing, please let the chat window have the “Guild” and “Group” tabs only when the character is in a guild or group. Or at least make hiding these tabs an optional feature.
This would also make it possible to add an alliance chat tab to the chat window without bloating it for the people who are not in an alliance. see my FR #2688 for this.
|
|
Feature Request | 2886 | No | GM System | Low | Assigned | Brian | Aresilek Besolez | gms report logs Completed Check mark | 20.12.2009 | | |
Task Description
Adding a check mark by each report to note someone has worked or completed any actions that needed to take place. A spot for notes might be nice as well.
|
|
Bug Report | 3685 | No | NPC Dialog | Low | Assigned | Seytra | Venalan | OK, OK, OK.... abbreviations everywhere | 21.12.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
In the NPC dialogs, there are several instances of modern-day abbreviations like "OK", "info" or "wow" (may be acceptable) being used. For example, in Fruntar's "Schaeminare soap" quest you can respond with "OK, where do I get this soap." (should be a question mark there, too). Also, in "A wife's dilemma", you can say to Tilavi "Ok, what kind of deal?". Maybe one could run a database search for "OK", "Ok", etc. on the NPC/quest responses to find all occurences?
|
|
Feature Request | 3981 | No | Inventory/Items | Low | New | Elvors Amenoras | | Disallow adding to forge/furnace if impossible | 14.02.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
Dropping an item in the forge or furnace while hammering something results in a message similar to “You can’t train your skill while working”, with the item sitting in the container but never heating up.
Instead, the item should refuse to drop in the forge/furnace (similar to the situation when capacity, weight, or slots are exhausted). Alternatively, the item could drop normally and start heating up.
I have two reasons for requesting this:
It runs counter to immersion. Stuff sitting in a hot place heats up in real life, it should do so in Ylliakum as well.
It is a griefing opportunity. Start hammering something, fill up the forge with stuff, and watch crafters despair. Since the stuff does not heat up, you can even continue crafting - you can take stuff from a slot normally and immediately replace it, the 300 ms lag will make sure that you can fill the slot before the other crafters even see that you freed the slot.
Feel free to change to Feature Request, I cannot know whether the current behaviour conforms to developer expectations or not.
|
|
Feature Request | 4463 | No | Magic System | Low | New | Mario Rohkrämer | | Adding a "natural resource detection" spell | 27.02.2011 | | 2 |
Task Description
You already mentioned that the former “Dweomer detection”, which only vaguely returns a possible enchantment of a weapon, is rather useless as there are also buffs which are not at all obvious regarding stats and skills.
Not to waste the spell in general, I wonder if it was possible to implement instead that a similar one could be used to detect the presence of natural resources. Depending on some experience level, possibly in combination with another glyph (e.g. Earth, Animal, Tree), it could enable the caster to only vaguely detect presence of areas in a more or less close range where mining, fishing, harvesting, etc. (generic type) might be possible (”You feel that harvesting could be possible here.”), up to a more detailed feeling that specific resources are probably in some vague but graduated distance (”You feel that fishing for carp could be possible just next to you.”).
Of course, any new spell could be created as well.
|
|
Feature Request | 4511 | No | Inventory/Items | Low | New | Nivm | | Create option to relinquish loot rights. | 23.06.2010 | | 1 |
Task Description
Make an option that allows a player to make the loot of a corpse public if they do not want it. May not apply to some corpses, and could be used to make other corpses auto-public.
|
|
Bug Report | 4574 | No | Engine | Low | New | Kaerli Stronwylle | | Ctrl or Shift modified keystrokes/mouse gestures trigge... | 11.11.2013 | | 1 |
Task Description
1) Ctrl-drag an item or use a shortcut bound to Ctrl-something 2) Note that your run toggle state just changed. :P
Using Ctrl or Shift as a modifier should “lock out” the functions bound to these keys by themselves.
|
|
Bug Report | 4588 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Tereay | | Misrepresentation of the character in the Inventory | 27.07.2010 | | 2 |
Task Description
Misrepresentation of the character in the Inventory All my dwarves (dark haired) are affected I use a self-compiled client (0.5.4/0.5.5) The same on Windows (0.5.4)
|
|
Bug Report | 4603 | No | Characters Animation | Low | New | Sen | | Odd enkif sneak animation | 09.02.2013 | | |
Task Description
The sneak animation of Fenkis is broken since.. I think years now. After trying out the new cool transparent-feature while sneaking looked it to me like the Menki one is broken, too? (fixed) Anyway, already the broken Fenki animation looks a bit annoying :P (It looks like side-stepping while walking)
Sen
|
|
Bug Report | 4608 | No | Character Textures | Low | Assigned | Mario Rohkrämer | Talad | Hiding in Shadows does not affect all body parts equall... | 10.08.2010 | | |
Task Description
There are models where body parts don’t get translucent while sneaking.
One example: Klyros wings.
(Wait for more to be collected…)
|
|
Feature Request | 4800 | No | Items Characteristics | Low | New | mike loeven | | have jayose and londris sell copies of library books an... | 24.10.2010 | | 3 |
Task Description
there are two libraries in the game one run by jayose in hydlaa and the other a smaller collection of books run by londris in the death realm.
one of the main complaints about planeshift is the lack of information about the game. both of these libraries contain information for ic use but at the same time the books are locked into their shelves and cannot even be coppied unless a player spends the time to manually enter everything into a text file and upload it to a blank book.
my idea is to share the information by adding buy and sell catagories to jayose and londris that match the bookshelves in the library and contain copies of the books stored in each. basically have them sell copies of the library books that you can take with you and share with your friends or even put in a guild hall for easier access.
in all it makes perfect sense that a man who sells blank books would have the resources to copy and sell the important guides and informational books stored in the library
|
|
Bug Report | 4831 | No | Quests Dynamics | Low | Unconfirmed | aurelynt | | Wrong message when paying a NPC using a dialog box whil... | 27.11.2010 | | |
Task Description
In a quest paying a NPC through a dialog box while having no money results in the following message: "<npc> does not need that". That seems wrong.
|
|
Bug Report | 4854 | No | Map Textures | Low | New | aurelynt | | Sky texture not correctly mapped to skydomes | 18.12.2010 | | |
Task Description
The skybox texture doesn’t seem to be correctly scaled to the skyboxes. Its borders are cropped and this results in very sharp and somewhat odd skylines:
PS 0.5.5
|
|
Feature Request | 4882 | No | Pets | Low | Unconfirmed | Firiban | | ride other people's mounts | 08.11.2022 | | |
Task Description
Hi, it would be nice if you could lend/rent your mount to other people. This could be made with a dialog box that appears when someone wants to /mount the pet (”Foo wants do ride your pet NameofThePet, allow?”), similar to challenges/trades. If this is implemented there should of cause be auto-accept/deny.
|
|
Feature Request | 5168 | No | User Interface | Low | New | Mrokii | | Option for different label-colour for buddies | 20.04.2011 | | 1 |
Task Description
It would be useful if the Option-Window also had an option to change the label-colour for people on ones' buddylist. This would especially be useful when there are a lot of players around, but it would make it easier to spot buddies in general as well.
|
|
Feature Request | 5321 | No | Spell Formulas | Low | Assigned | Daevaorn | Davide Vescovini | Exploration: Areas need more prominent notice | 17.04.2016 | | 3 |
Task Description
I think that many of the newly “explorable areas” will go unnoticed by people because the only indication, the system message is lost between so many others.
Why not have an on-screen notice about reaching such a spot, especially now that those notices are optional anyway?
|