PlaneShift

Gameplay => Wish list => Topic started by: Bguy on August 06, 2009, 03:41:20 am

Title: Relative Stats
Post by: Bguy on August 06, 2009, 03:41:20 am
     A problem with the current stat system is that, since the stats are based on constants, their is too little relativity given between quantity (the stats) and quality (how strong the character should be while RPing) . For example, would a person with 200 Strength be considered pretty strong if more than half of PlaneShift was maxed out? Since there is almost no way to figure out how your stats are relative to the masses, it is easy to accidentally god-mod (by claiming to be more extraordinary than you are) or over-weaken your character. This is one of the many struggles between  rp and mechanics that should be sorted out.
     Instead of remaking the entire system to create self-averaging stats (so that the mean of all stats is always 100), a much simpler solution would be to just post an updating section on the site that displays the average of stats (and possibly skills as well). This will not interfere with the current mechanics, and allow players to have a relative point for players to work with. Also, if averages can be put on the site, no doubt outlier numbers and maybe even a bell curve for each stat. Also, having this information online would be interesting to look at over time, seeing how the averages rise (with training) and fall (with new members). If it isn't too much of a struggle to record stats as deaths and value of sold goods are, it would be very helpful to have.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: kiou on August 06, 2009, 05:35:24 am
this is a sexy idea, some way for us to continue combining game and rp, while staying fair.

ye posting the average online would be cool, but as usual *insert dead horse* i think peoples stats should be determined by their skills and have caps that are unique to each player.....

right so, great idea :thumbup:
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: weltall on August 06, 2009, 07:38:07 am
     A problem with the current stat system is that, since the stats are based on constants, their is too little relativity given between quantity (the stats) and quality (how strong the character should be while RPing) . For example, would a person with 200 Strength be considered pretty strong if more than half of PlaneShift was maxed out? Since there is almost no way to figure out how your stats are relative to the masses, it is easy to accidentally god-mod (by claiming to be more extraordinary than you are) or over-weaken your character. This is one of the many struggles between  rp and mechanics that should be sorted out.
     Instead of remaking the entire system to create self-averaging stats (so that the mean of all stats is always 100), a much simpler solution would be to just post an updating section on the site that displays the average of stats (and possibly skills as well). This will not interfere with the current mechanics, and allow players to have a relative point for players to work with. Also, if averages can be put on the site, no doubt outlier numbers and maybe even a bell curve for each stat. Also, having this information online would be interesting to look at over time, seeing how the averages rise (with training) and fall (with new members). If it isn't too much of a struggle to record stats as deaths and value of sold goods are, it would be very helpful to have.

it won't work a media of all. the value would be screwed by the army of untrained alts and by the other army of people not playing the game anymore stopping after some days
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Bguy on August 06, 2009, 02:19:26 pm
it won't work a media of all. the value would be screwed by the army of untrained alts and by the other army of people not playing the game anymore stopping after some days
Could that possibly be factored in? It only monitors people who have been logged in within the past week? Also the "army of untrained alts" could realistically portray the inactive masses of citizens in real life (I mean, not everybody in the world would be training and killing monsters). I am not talking about how you fair among adventurers, but how you fair amongst society.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: weltall on August 06, 2009, 03:30:19 pm
depends but if a char has from 1 to 15 alts (yes i've heard even of more from some players than those numbers) the thing is unbalanced again and you still don't get what you want. on the other end you would get something near 200 for stats at least
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Rigwyn on August 06, 2009, 05:32:12 pm

Just curious - how/why would it be useful to know how your character's stats compare to everyone else's stats ?

I ask because for RP I dont think stats really matter that much ( unless you dice roll again the other player's stats )
Also for PVP the *player's dueling skill* alone can be the deciding factor in a pvp duel. So again, stats would matter less.

Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Bguy on August 06, 2009, 11:49:15 pm

Just curious - how/why would it be useful to know how your character's stats compare to everyone else's stats ?

I ask because for RP I dont think stats really matter that much ( unless you dice roll again the other player's stats )
Also for PVP the *player's dueling skill* alone can be the deciding factor in a pvp duel. So again, stats would matter less.

See this is how people think because rp and mechanics are so far separated. I think that how strong or smart you are should be relevant to others so that the "experience can be more complete." Why should a person who can take out dlayos be able to be taken down by a rat killer because of the turnout of rping? Stats SHOULD matter in rp as they create limitations and advantages for your player to use. If rp was closer to mechanics, then it would be easier to set rules upon.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Rigwyn on August 07, 2009, 12:03:29 am

I agree up to a point.

Stats should be taken into consideration however so should a character's history.
If someone has RP'd a character for years as a strong mage lets say, and most other
players acknowledge this character as a strong mage regardless of his actual stats, then
should a newb who has just spent the last 48 hours maxing his stats expect to dominate
this character in rp because his stats are higher ?  In my opinion, I don't think he should.

My main character has his 6 stats maxed and has high sword dw and cw however I dont
try to dominate characters in rp who have been playing much longer that I have.  From
what I have seen most RP characters do not appear to be maxed.

A second point is in the value of measuring yourself against the average of all other players..
How is it of value to know for example that your character is in the 99.9th percentile statwise ?
How would that information be applied in rp ?

Again, Im not criticizing your views - rather I'm just seeking to see this from your point of view.

Thanks
Rig
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Bguy on August 07, 2009, 03:07:05 am
Stats should be taken into consideration however so should a character's history.
If someone has RP'd a character for years as a strong mage lets say, and most other
players acknowledge this character as a strong mage regardless of his actual stats, then
should a newb who has just spent the last 48 hours maxing his stats expect to dominate
this character in rp because his stats are higher ?  In my opinion, I don't think he should.
If a person did spend 48 hours straight, training for the experience an older player has achieved over time, this can be placed in an rp perspective. The newer person could be seen as a workaholic, with an unhealthy lifestyle to match his/her extreme desire to train. In this situation, it really depends on the rp situation, as even this massive pling can be put into a realistic rp situation. For skills, the newer person would have the same or possible more theoretical knowledge, but the older person would have rp advantages, like experience and a couple of learned tricks. In my opinion, either one would be able to beat the other depending on the rp. Also, you can rp yourself to be older then you have been playing for, so a new player can rp an old experienced person, and vice versa.

My main character has his 6 stats maxed and has high sword dw and cw however I dont
try to dominate characters in rp who have been playing much longer that I have.  From
what I have seen most RP characters do not appear to be maxed.

The RP people that don't max out stats are exactly the kind of people that are important for this. Not everyone in real life is an olympic athlete, so such people are considered above ordinary. If every single person went around maxing stats, the realistic diversity would be eliminated, and the standards of "average" would be too high for most new players.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Entevir on August 09, 2009, 12:00:53 am
Personally, I think the idea of an average stat and skill level display is nice and would be rather interesting to have even if slightly depressing for my characters who all without exceptions surely fall under the average.

And on the topic of mechanics vs RP. What irks me is when people with 200 strength write their description as a slim person. I RP a slim person and for that set myself a cap on strength at 80. This puts me at a disadvantage in more or less all RP situations but at least makes some sense. Say what you want but there is no way that an Olympic weight lifter can have a ballet dancers build.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Duraza on August 09, 2009, 01:45:24 am
The RP people that don't max out stats are exactly the kind of people that are important for this. Not everyone in real life is an olympic athlete, so such people are considered above ordinary. If every single person went around maxing stats, the realistic diversity would be eliminated, and the standards of "average" would be too high for most new players.

The question: Are maxed out stats -average- strength? I don't think it is... but then again everyone can do it, why shouldn't it be average? You wouldn't have a problem with this at all if players weren't able to max every stat they have. I've rant about this before but I'm not sure whether it will ever happen (especially because its 'unheard' of to have a limit to the amount of leveling and grinding one can do).
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: verden on August 09, 2009, 02:47:01 am
Perhaps there could be "achievements" added to the descriptions when particular skill/level combinations were reached by a character. This could be in the form of titles added to the characters descriptions. Or some other method of publishing so that players that were in proximity could query and verify that one was a "master sword craftsman", and roleplay could proceed accordingly. There would, of course, be a lot of titles. But achievement systems seem to be well-received by players in a number of other games. OOC information, of course.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: kiou on August 09, 2009, 05:43:16 am
i just wanna point out that 48 hours irl, is just twelve ingame days, so no there is no way someone who trains their stats like that can be called an equal to a mage who is years old. Remember that while ingame it may be easy-ish to advance quickly, in rp its more realistic, people dont master things in less than two weeks. If they do its not unlike godmodding.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Vengeance on August 09, 2009, 07:04:57 am
I just looked, and out of 375,719 characters on laanx, only 30 people have any skill maxed out to 200.

Only 1900 in the history of the game have achieved STR at 200.

If you have STR of 200, you can feel good about RPing "strong" without us coding a super-complex system for additional precision.  ;-)
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Rigwyn on August 09, 2009, 01:05:54 pm

@Vengeance  Wow ! Im rather surprised to hear that .. I would have though more players would have maxed their stats.

@Kiou  48 hours was an exageration... What I was suggesting is someone who who has no job (or takes a vacation) and grinds day and night to get their stats maxed as quickly as possible. I see now from what Vengeance said that this type of player is not  as common as I had thought.

Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Bguy on August 09, 2009, 02:27:08 pm
@Vengence So what would the average strength be?
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Prolix on August 09, 2009, 06:27:14 pm
You can pretty much figure that 90% of those 1900 with maxed strength have the other stats maxed and the other 10% will likely too soon. bilbous' stats are all maxed but none of my alts' are anywhere close. Of course that 375k characters is misleading as I would assume at least 300k would be effectively abandoned. What I mean by effectively abandoned are characters with less than 10 hours play-time so far in 2009. That would likely include all my alts on the main server, probably all my characters on ezpc -- maybe not including Kra Katoa -- and possibly bilbous my oldest and main character on laanx.

It would be interesting to see how many characters would be considered active using that as a criteria.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Duraza on August 09, 2009, 06:50:37 pm
You can pretty much figure that 90% of those 1900 with maxed strength have the other stats maxed and the other 10% will likely too soon. bilbous' stats are all maxed but none of my alts' are anywhere close. Of course that 375k characters is misleading as I would assume at least 300k would be effectively abandoned.

This is of course speculation but...

Out of those 75k you basically predict being left we can't forget but to mention how many are just mules for carrying additional items... or alts that are rarely used and not trained (most players only train their main character but as mentioned before players can have like 14 alts or more).

The fact that 1900 out of much less than 75k active characters have maxed stats will probably still be worrisome. With the full 100 characters I see online (300 is the best I've seen and that was years ago) even if you said each of those 300 players had 15 alts you'd end up with around 4500 characters....

I know..Not all 1900 of those strength maxed characters are active, probably over 1000 of them no longer playing...But there are not 4500 active characters on Laanx either. Not even close. You're going to end up with a lot more of those maxed stats people then you should and thats the truth, and a lot more who are working their way toward maxing....I'm not seeing how this is going to hold true:

If you have STR of 200, you can feel good about RPing "strong" without us coding a super-complex system for additional precision.  ;-)

But like I said, just my thoughts, not any facts.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Under the moon on August 09, 2009, 08:12:42 pm
200 strength, based on what you can do (the amount you can carry while running, wrestling ulbers for fun, etc), would likely make your character look like this guy.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Dexter_Jackson_IFBB_2008_Australia_3.jpg/270px-Dexter_Jackson_IFBB_2008_Australia_3.jpg)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Jackson_%28bodybuilder%29

Oh, and one for the ladies as well.... *shudders*
(http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/3241/115436091435204ae093tg0.jpg)
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Timmothy Perriwinkle on August 09, 2009, 08:15:06 pm
Exactly. Now tell me, after seeing that can anyone really say that Kaerli is "beautiful" ever again?
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Keldrena on August 09, 2009, 11:22:04 pm
Different strokes,  Timmothy.
Title: Re: Relative Stats
Post by: Prolix on August 10, 2009, 05:37:28 am
@ Duraza Absolutely it was an edumacated guesstimate and very generous. It would not surprise me one bit if the actual numbers of "effectively abandoned" were even higher. I think I have logged 10 hours on bilbous in 2009 but I might not have, probably 30-40 I'm guessing. I can't even be sure how many accounts I have, a few were made testing the registration system when people were having trouble receiving their authentication email. I didn't keep track of them.