He's uh... my pet.  I feed him bacon, the spoiled bastard.

Psch, 'stunning'... Such flattery... I prefer the term 'overwhelmingly spectacularly handsome'.

And what do you mean by that? Are you implying I'm not limp and skinny enough for you!? Thou hath spit acid most foul, from twixt your fang-ed teeth!!

I knew you would change your tune.  They always do...

I'll come for you, then.  I shall be in Ireland by Saturday, love. 

No, I said you looked gay. There's a difference

Oh yeah?!?!  Well you look...


... absolutely stunning. 

But sorry, you're just not my type.  I need a man that will crumble in the breeze like a wetted card-house set in a windtunnel... Say Garris!  Hi!  How ya doin'? 




Okay, sooner or later someone is going to take me seriously and I'm gonna get kicked off the forum for "excessive giddy creepiness," so the joking stops now!

Um... If by 'complete', you mean ram my boot up your arse, then sure...

Denied like a poor guy at a whore house... Ouch!

Maybe emerald was right all along... maybe I am gay...

No offense, but your sense of humour reminds me of my own. 

That being said, I feel like the title, "LameShift: Cyanide Blue" does not NEARLY live up to my standards, and am often even tempted to take my own life out of disgust with myself, but I always come to my senses just before I run out of air and remember that I didn't come up with it. 

How about "LameShift: Crystal Meth" or "PlainShift: Country Backroad", a delightful "Little House on a Prarie" themed comic which stresses good family values and foot-stompin', old fashioned fun for everyone.

But those questions have obvious answers.  It's the difference between love and suffering.  It's the difference between right and wrong.

What makes today so heartbreaking is the fact that given the choice, many people have chosen violence, suffering, exploitation, and murder.  And humanity suffers as a result.

You're a beautiful man, Zanzibar.  A beautiful man.

Addressing Garile's post, though, I, too, don't see any real validity in the argument that pilots that untrained could not crash into the buildings.  Seems easy enough; you just fly straight.  And I know everyone is going to hop on my back, beat my bum with switches and say "It's not THAT easy!" and confessedly I do exaggerate... there is a LOT more to flying an ariplane than just "flying straight," but remember that these were terrorists that were clearly devoted, as they proved by being willing to die for their beliefs in the first place, so learning and practicing enough to have that sort of skill is no particularly large feat.

Plus, I imagine that, at the very least on other flights, there were a lot of testimonies as to the ethnicity of the culprits, and it's not like american pilots would be behind some of the hi-jackings and middle-eastern people behind others, so it's pretty incontrovertible that they were indeed middle-eastern terrorists hi-jacking the planes.

But where does this get us?  Nowhere, really.  For every argument, there is usually an equally compelling counter-argument, such as that the U.S. Government hired the Taliban to perform the attack.  Regardless of whether or not that is even remotely near the truth, it is at least a valid possibility, and it didn't take too much imagination to come up with, so that essentially we're no nearer to discovering what really happened.

This is exactly why the White House needs Hillary Clinton in office!  Men seem to be much too comfortable with not telling the truth.  A woman probably wouldn't stand for it, all the lies, the deception...

P.S.  A tad bit unrelated... but Zanzibar, is your name in reference to Metal Gear Sold???

Nice guitar Xus. What make is it?

It looks nicer than it plays, trust me.  It's an Ibanez, but it was a low-end $200 one (I don't know how many pounds that is; figure it out!)  Actually, it's not too bad, it just constantly goes out of tune whenever I use the tremolo bar (but its got a floating bridge   likely the only guitar for that price with one) and it's only got one double-coil pick-up, and two single-coils.  But on the plus-side, it's got a sweet arch-top, which is an absolute must for me; I'm just crazy about the arch-top look, so I realli don't even express much of an interest at all in guitars without one.  Elitist, perhaps, but so be it.  

Wait... you actually get a free education just 'cause you're of impure blood? Well damn, wish it was that easy in Ireland
Have you even been to Mexico?

Not free!  Oh no, that's just full tuition.  And I almost went to Mexico once... cause we got off at the wrong Exit on the highway.    Anyway, it doesnt matter!  They never asked!  It's their money to go pissing away on people like me!

But don't Aussie's have it even easier?  I heard that if you live in Australia for enough time, the government will pay for your entire college education anywhere in the country.

But that's just what I heard... Other countries have it even better than I do!  Go look for 'em!  I mean it!  Go!  Look!  Now!

(I dislike the government alot, and I do believe they lie to us about many things because of their agendas. But I think that this prison planet thing is like the study group that is trying to deny the Holocaust of World War II

Hey hey hey, an unwilling american after my own taste.  How ya doing?

I don't think anyone is trying to deny that those planes did hit, but the only reason there is mention of explosives is because there are a lot of feelings that the plane crash alone wouldn't be detrimental enough to the building structure to make it collapse.  I, not having any sort of education in demolitions or structural engineering, have no clue about it, but as a common layman I can testify that the collapses do look a bit fishy, but then, like I just said, I don't know anything... But you bring up a good point about the explosives and how anyone could possibly get them up there in the building.  Mind you, it realli wouldn't be necessary (or, indeed, very effective) for the explosives to be high-up in the building, but more likely, if they were involved, they would be placed lower in the structure (thank you Metal Gear Solid: Sons of Liberty for the crash-course in bomb placement strategy ).  Yet even still, it would be quite near impossible for the explosives to have been placed there in advance (and with the chaos of a quaking, evacuating building, it would indeed have to be in advance) without anyone seeing them during installation, or for the period of time afterward.  Therefore, if explosives were indeed used (and I think someone said earlier in the thread that many people testified to having smelt explosives), then they were likely allowed to be installed, which further points to some kind of deeper premeditation than what we were all told.  (Mind you I's not even CLOSE to stating that as fact, Parallo, just speculatin' ).

But all in all (and I got a lot of crap for making this claim before, but so be it; I'm gonna say it again), I think that the way little tidbits of information and inconsistencies keep showing up points pretty constantly to a real POSSIBILITY and even likeliness that there is definitely more to this incident than what we were all told, but the depth of that deception is probably somewhere slightly deeper than a mistaken news reporter and slightly shallower than a deep, dark, secret political move from the Illuminati.  Do I think we're all safe sleeping in bed tonight?  Sure, sleep away, weary soul.  But am I still going to keep reading other posts and other sources to try to learn the truth behind all of this, simply to assuage some base, primordial lust for understanding?  You bet I am.