Author Topic: 9/11 Pentagon - Plane or Missile?  (Read 10405 times)

Waylander

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1562
  • Constantly correct since 1988
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #45 on: September 08, 2004, 12:34:41 am »
Hmm, Seperot stop posting things like that it makes it harder to build up the urge to kill you :P

And I think it was God\'s fault, due to the fact that most things that are unexplained seem to be.

If it was a conspiracy wouldn\'t you think that they would have disabled the cameras before so that there was no chance of word leaking out.
<Jeraphon>oh khado
<Jeraphon>you so khrazy

Xil|sleeps: I love cadoras

Waylander, A.K.A: Cadoras, Khado, Nurahk, Armeen, Nostra ... God.

zabeal

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 369
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #46 on: September 08, 2004, 02:52:45 am »
Did everyone ignore my post? I feel so unloved ;(

Quote
Originally posted by zabeal
Whenever you hear an urban legend, first check snopes.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm


Abemore specifically, all those points are debunked. The parts were mostly vaporised, there was a giant black outilen in the shape of a plane, and parts on the other side of the building had to be repaired.

Lux perpetua luceat eis

davo

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 232
    • View Profile
lol
« Reply #47 on: September 08, 2004, 03:33:56 am »
stupid yanks

always on about some crap.......lol
in game name : davoid

Levski

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 426
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #48 on: September 08, 2004, 04:27:05 am »
Quote

For the last time, the US of A is a REPUBLIC!  Why can\'t democrats/liberals get that through their heads!


Definition of Republic Moneketh?  A government run by the elected representatives of the people.  Basically, it never says anywhere in that that those representatives and the \'elite\' they represent can\'t hide secrets from us.

Quote
I\'m not sure whether to laugh at how ludicrous this claim is, or cry in pity because you believe it....
Those attacks were planned far in advance, before Bush stepped into office.  Gore wouldn\'t have seen them coming, either.  Don\'t even try to prove this, I\'m not reading blogs.


First off, what is a blog?  Second off, Clinton and Gore had already dealt with terrorism in their 8 year stretch.  That shows that Gore wouldn\'t have ignored signs of the attack as Bush did.  Yeah, it might have been planned for a long time before.  But Gore would have had the wisdom to see the signs, instead of saying \'it isn\'t clear enough\' (the report, I mean).

Quote
I see you\'re still a little bitter over florida.  Gore was a politician and you know it.  As for 40% of his time on vacation, where did you come up with this figure?  I\'d really like to know.

Bush did what he said he would, even ol\' Bill Clinton admitted it.


The majority of Americans are still bitter over Florida ;):P.  Even besides the whole not-counting-minorities thing, the electorate system is old and it should be put where other such antiquated systems are - six feet under.  The 40% comes from Fahrenheit 9/11.  

Quote
Yes, it would have.  I don\'t care how much better a president you think Gore would have made, that wouldn\'t have changed it.


Bush should have used his pre-emptive strategy when it mattered ;).  Who\'s to say Gore wouldn\'t have?

Quote
No, that\'s a lie.  Bush would not have a 2-point lead if that were true.  Those for and against are too close for it to be called in your favor.


Bush only has a 2-point lead because of the bump he got from the GOP Convention.  Kerry had a little bump after the Democratic Convention too.   Besides, such polls have a 3% error margin.

@Monketh:  These internet debates can last forever...
« Last Edit: September 08, 2004, 04:29:23 am by Levski »
Ingame name:  Nuv Cerdyn  ~   Member of: The Blitzers Guild

leji

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #49 on: September 08, 2004, 04:04:16 pm »
You americans are so funny !!!
Struggling to know if there are conspiracy in governments or if they hide things... of course they do,  each government in the world do that !
The main problem is that in US the medias are too easily manipulated by anyone who have money, imagine a second that tonight you see a top priority information flash on CBS or whatever channel saying that France launched a missile towards US but hopefully, it was destroyed before it could explode. What would you think ? would you believe it ? of course you would ! why would they lie on TV ? and would the man speaking on TV believe it ? of course he would ! why would he\'s boss lie on such important things ? and he\'s boss believe this ? of course he would ! why would a man who gives 1 billion $ each year would lie ?
What clue do you have to check ? none, the missile was destroyed ! What do you government do ? attack France ! obvious, if you dont attack they will think they can do it again...
Don\'t you think there\'s a problem somewhere ?

Yes, maybe the 1 billion $ was a problem, but the main problem is that none of you (by you I mean every single citizen who was for the war in Iraq in any form) remembers that normally, justice should not take any decision against if there is a doubt. I dont know if you have the same system as us, but in France, if there is any doubt about something you cannot attack (at least it\'s what\'s written in the law...). So as soon as no massive destruction weapon was found in Iraq, US should not have attacked. That\'s all.

Of course, most of you think that US is the most powerful country in the world and that therefor it has to take risks to protect itself from terrosism, but wake up ! why is there so much murders and terrorism threat in US ? because you are seeing the world like a place where america should reign ! Countries like Iraq cannot live under a democracy for the moment, if it could there would already be one.  America is not even a real democracy (France isn\'t either) cause you choose you\'re president between two guys who have exactly the same background ideas and objectives, who are those guys ? Can you Levski present yourself as a president ? Well, in a real democracy you should be able to.. and easily.. don\'t tell me it\'s impossible, in our last election one of the candidate was a postman, he has never been ministre or whatever, but he presented himself, he had 3% of votes or something like that, and that\'s great ! He didn\'t have loads of red white and blue balloons falling from the ceilling when he was speaking, he didn\'t need actors and singers to come to meetings and say he is the man that we need, he just had a program that was presented on tv as all the other programs and that\'s all.
While the black female postman of your block cannot be a president, you will be manipulated even more than us, and that\'s sad, cause you could have a wonderful country but instead of that you have one of the last countries I would like to visit.

Well I talked quite much so I\'ll leave it here and as Levski said those debate could last forever so I\'ll just quit this one.

PS: Look up in a dictionnary the difference between republic and democracy, I think you really need it !
PS2: I just realized that it\'s not the place to discuss those kind of things don\'t you think ?
there\'s no place like 203.81.47.91

DevotedEternal

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 169
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #50 on: September 08, 2004, 04:07:43 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Monketh
Oh great, here we go again!

It does sometimes seem that I\'m the Official Unofficial Argument Lawyer for the Bush Administration and G.O.P. in this forum sometimes, doesn\'t it?
Well, someone\'s gotta do it, they don\'t deserve flak like this.

Quote
Originally posted by Levski
Quote
Smoke isn\'t square in real-life. You\'ve been in the dungeons too long, Bub. Observe the other frames, it\'s the same shape.


 :D .  But anyways, smoke can very well look like that in a pixelated image, which might, I accede, be pixelated on purpose.


It was pixelated by the author, or was originally low-resolution.  The pixelation was created deliberately to hide the airplane.

Quote
No, but I\'d sure like an administration which doesn\'t deliberately try to hide them from us.  Is the United States a Democracy, or is the government using the people?  For some reason, I tend to think the latter ever since George W. Bush stepped into office.


For the last time, the US of A is a REPUBLIC!  Why can\'t democrats/liberals get that through their heads!

Quote

Now, do you think that September 11th would have happened if Al Gore was in office (and it was his own damn fault he didn\'t let Clinton campaign for him)?  I don\'t.  


I\'m not sure whether to laugh at how ludicrous this claim is, or cry in pity because you believe it....
Those attacks were planned far in advance, before Bush stepped into office.  Gore wouldn\'t have seen them coming, either.  Don\'t even try to prove this, I\'m not reading blogs.

Quote

President Bush just isn\'t on the same caliber as he is/was.  Now, when George W. Bush stepped into office, what did he do?  Nothing visible to the American public.  He struggled for control of the senate, he spent 40% of his time on vacation.  Al Gore had clear goals and he had an advantage over Bush, he just came from the White House.  So what does that do?  It makes him experienced.  And that is all that counts.


I see you\'re still a little bitter over florida.  Gore was a politician and you know it.  As for 40% of his time on vacation, where did you come up with this figure?  I\'d really like to know.

Bush did what he said he would, even ol\' Bill Clinton admitted it.

Quote

So let\'s not argue as to whether or not the Pentagon was hit, because it was.  Would it have been hit, would September 11th have happened, if Al Gore had been elected?  No, I don\'t think so.


Yes, it would have.  I don\'t care how much better a president you think Gore would have made, that wouldn\'t have changed it.

Quote

Note:  This isn\'t an angry/mad/flame post.  It is simply a discussion post.


Noted and filed.

[edit: ]
More meat:
Quote
Originally posted by DevotedEternal
Quote
Originally posted by leji
Of course I\'m just a little freaky french who\'s against the war in Iraq the way it\'s done , and who\'s infos come from national tv\'s and newspaper and not from CBS or FoxNews... But if u guys really think that u\'re administration is conspirating just dont reelect them ... please !!!


Don\'t worry, most of us Americans are too.


No, that\'s a lie.  Bush would not have a 2-point lead if that were true.  Those for and against are too close for it to be called in your favor.
Plus the \"and\" implies being completely against, and doesn\'t take into account those feeling the war was justified, but who disagree with the methods used.


But there is no \"and\"... it just says \"who\'s against the war in Iraq the way it\'s done \"

DevotedEternal

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 169
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #51 on: September 08, 2004, 04:12:43 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by davo
stupid yanks

always on about some crap.......lol


... There is no need for prejudice.

[EDIT: Sorry for the double post.]
« Last Edit: September 08, 2004, 04:13:06 pm by DevotedEternal »

Monketh

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1674
  • aka GovernmentAgent, CorporateAgent
    • View Profile
    • Niihama.ws
(No subject)
« Reply #52 on: September 08, 2004, 09:59:57 pm »
Stuff from Levski:
Quote
Originally posted by Levski
Quote

For the last time, the US of A is a REPUBLIC!  Why can\'t democrats/liberals get that through their heads!


Definition of Republic Moneketh?  A government run by the elected representatives of the people.  Basically, it never says anywhere in that that those representatives and the \'elite\' they represent can\'t hide secrets from us.


You asked if the United States was a democracy.
Both parties represent the elite, you know that.

Quote

Quote
I\'m not sure whether to laugh at how ludicrous this claim is, or cry in pity because you believe it....
Those attacks were planned far in advance, before Bush stepped into office.  Gore wouldn\'t have seen them coming, either.  Don\'t even try to prove this, I\'m not reading blogs.


First off, what is a blog?  Second off, Clinton and Gore had already dealt with terrorism in their 8 year stretch.  That shows that Gore wouldn\'t have ignored signs of the attack as Bush did.  Yeah, it might have been planned for a long time before.  But Gore would have had the wisdom to see the signs, instead of saying \'it isn\'t clear enough\' (the report, I mean).

How much did they do?
Did they do anything about it a year into their terms?
Gore would not have stopped it.

Quote

Quote
I see you\'re still a little bitter over florida.  Gore was a politician and you know it.  As for 40% of his time on vacation, where did you come up with this figure?  I\'d really like to know.

Bush did what he said he would, even ol\' Bill Clinton admitted it.


The majority of Americans are still bitter over Florida ;):P.  


Again, be careful where you use the word \"majority\".
A majority can be defined by one person, but using the word implies a large amount of people.

Quote

Even besides the whole not-counting-minorities thing, the electorate system is old and it should be put where other such antiquated systems are - six feet under.  The 40% comes from Fahrenheit 9/11.  


And I trust a big, fat, stupid white man like M. Moore why?  I might point out that he\'s getting ridiculously rich off of his little propaganda video.

Quote

Quote
Yes, it would have.  I don\'t care how much better a president you think Gore would have made, that wouldn\'t have changed it.


Bush should have used his pre-emptive strategy when it mattered ;).  Who\'s to say Gore wouldn\'t have?


Gore attack pre-emptively, ooh boy that\'s a good one!  :)
You couldn\'t pre-emptively seize people before 9/11 stateside by the way.

Quote

Quote
No, that\'s a lie.  Bush would not have a 2-point lead if that were true.  Those for and against are too close for it to be called in your favor.


Bush only has a 2-point lead because of the bump he got from the GOP Convention.  Kerry had a little bump after the Democratic Convention too.   Besides, such polls have a 3% error margin.

Again, like I said, it\'s more of a matter of being careful in your use of \"majority\".

Quote

@Monketh:  These internet debates can last forever...


Indeed.

Error:
Quote

But there is no \"and\"... it just says \"who\'s against the war in Iraq the way it\'s done \"


Ah, brain fart, read it as \"and\".  My apologies.


Stuff from Leji:
Quote

You americans are so funny !!!


I\'d be laughing too if this whole Presidential race wasn\'t so damn serious in affecting the future...

Quote

Struggling to know if there are conspiracy in governments or if they hide things... of course they do, each government in the world do that !


But not all things, we\'re just bored.

Quote

The main problem is that in US the medias are too easily manipulated by anyone who have money, imagine a second that tonight you see a top priority information flash on CBS or whatever channel saying that France launched a missile towards US but hopefully, it was destroyed before it could explode. What would you think ? would you believe it ? of course you would ! why would they lie on TV ? and would the man speaking on TV believe it ? of course he would ! why would he\'s boss lie on such important things ? and he\'s boss believe this ? of course he would ! why would a man who gives 1 billion $ each year would lie ?
What clue do you have to check ? none, the missile was destroyed ! What do you government do ? attack France ! obvious, if you dont attack they will think they can do it again...


Yes, I proclaim a new american proverb: \"He who owns the media, owns the country.\"

Quote

Don\'t you think there\'s a problem somewhere ?


Of course.

Quote

Yes, maybe the 1 billion $ was a problem, but the main problem is that none of you (by you I mean every single citizen who was for the war in Iraq in any form) remembers that normally, justice should not take any decision against if there is a doubt. I dont know if you have the same system as us, but in France, if there is any doubt about something you cannot attack (at least it\'s what\'s written in the law...). So as soon as no massive destruction weapon was found in Iraq, US should not have attacked. That\'s all.


Mass graves are sufficient evidence.  Saddam\'s atrocities are documented.  This is not saying we\'re going to overthrow dictators the world over, of course, because we aren\'t capable of that.  The whole Idea is to install Democracy/Republic in the Middle East.

Quote

Of course, most of you think that US is the most powerful country in the world and that therefor it has to take risks to protect itself from terrosism, but wake up ! why is there so much murders and terrorism threat in US ? because you are seeing the world like a place where america should reign !


Damn straight we do, we do not want to be controlled by outside interests, nobody smaller\'n us is going to tell us what to do.  Certainly not terrorists, certainly not Liberal Europe (Liberal Europe here denotes Liberals in Europe, not all of Europe).

The big threat is Nuclear Terrorism, it isn\'t a threat right now, but you can imagine what will happen when it happens.  Terrorists must be exterminated now to prevent these future mass atrocities.  The way to do that is setting up democracy, which checks itself, and backing it against armed takeover by etremists.

Quote

Countries like Iraq cannot live under a democracy for the moment, if it could there would already be one.


Supression, dictators do that, ya\' know?

Quote

America is not even a real democracy (France isn\'t either) cause you choose you\'re president between two guys who have exactly the same background ideas and objectives, who are those guys ? Can you Levski present yourself as a president ? Well, in a real democracy you should be able to.. and easily.. don\'t tell me it\'s impossible, in our last election one of the candidate was a postman, he has never been ministre or whatever, but he presented himself, he had 3% of votes or something like that, and that\'s great ! He didn\'t have loads of red white and blue balloons falling from the ceilling when he was speaking, he didn\'t need actors and singers to come to meetings and say he is the man that we need, he just had a program that was presented on tv as all the other programs and that\'s all.


It is impossible.
You know how big we are compared to France?  You know how much it would cost to advertise yourself to the 250 million americans?  I\'d like a different system of course, other than our current Extreme-Right vs. Extreme-Left one.  When I get older, I\'m gonna try to found a moderate party.  Most of our third party candidates are nut-jobs.
Pork-barrel Spending runs rampant, politicians run up huge deficits, the masses are uninformed and easily persuaded by TV ads, corruption is common among local politicians, nobody bother to inform themselves of their choices anymore, Michael Moore is making vast sums off of propaganda, the Bush Administration isn\'t healthy to the environment, Kerry will cripple us with taxes to fund his healthcare program, normal people are giving up on government because both parties suck...  
...and the list goes on.  You know that the Big Parties won\'t choose moderates to run for president, and that you need thosands of signatures in petition to run from a state in every state, right?

Quote

Well I talked quite much so I\'ll leave it here and as Levski said those debate could last forever so I\'ll just quit this one.


I respect that, I would too if I wasn\'t so bored.

Quote

PS: Look up in a dictionnary the difference between republic and democracy, I think you really need it !
PS2: I just realized that it\'s not the place to discuss those kind of things don\'t you think ?

@PS1~Methinks: Les dictionnaires Francais (sp*) est autre.  
@PS2~Where else, if not here?

Stuff from Leji: In conclusion, the Gov\'t of the US would take the effort of thousands interested only in reforming it properly (meaning thousands of swing voters, who aren\'t going to reform it Left-or-Right Wing and won\'t argue much) to set it straight.  Such a group does not exist.

Stuff from Levski: In conclusion, Gore could not have prevented the destruction of Sept. 11.

Error: My bad...
The key to manipulative bargaining is to ask for something twice as big as what you want, then smile and nod when you are talked down to your original wish. You are still young, my apprentice, and have much to learn in the ways of the force. -UtM

Waylander

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1562
  • Constantly correct since 1988
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #53 on: September 08, 2004, 11:29:01 pm »
It isn\'t impossible, you get a little funding, show that the direction the country will go in if you elect the other guys is terrible and leave out that you can\'t do a better job than them, and you might just win.

Hmm, that sounds like I am saying USA is going to fall apart, which wouldn\'t be overly surprising, but what I really mean to say is that the whole world is going down, Europe is going to unite though, I mean Euro-fighter,  The Euro than the strongest, richest, nicest country would be England & co :P

...this could end bad if people take me seriously :P
« Last Edit: September 08, 2004, 11:29:17 pm by Waylander »
<Jeraphon>oh khado
<Jeraphon>you so khrazy

Xil|sleeps: I love cadoras

Waylander, A.K.A: Cadoras, Khado, Nurahk, Armeen, Nostra ... God.

leji

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #54 on: September 08, 2004, 11:39:07 pm »
I don\'t know how to quote so I\'ll do this the old way :) :

-----------
--The big threat is Nuclear Terrorism, it isn\'t a threat right now, but you can imagine what will happen when it happens. Terrorists must be exterminated now to prevent these future mass atrocities. The way to do that is setting up democracy, which checks itself, and backing it against armed takeover by etremists.

That\'s exactly what I meant, you can\'t exterminate terrorism, the more you attack any group the more you\'ll be attacked, it has been proved throughout centuries of history, stop attacking, make compromises, accept that democracy is not at all the perfect system (otherwise USA wouldn\'t have put Saddam and Pinochet to power, would they ?), and above all, stop being afraid !  (look at the cartoon in farenheit 911 and you\'ll understand why) I\'m sure it\'s not natural for you not to be afraid, you seem to be taught to, but being afraid is the best way to be manipulated, try thinking by yourself, read the Coran, check on the web why people fight in Iraq or in Tchetchenia, you\'ll see that if you threaten them, they wont threaten you.

-----------
--You know how big we are compared to France? You know how much it would cost to advertise yourself to the 250 million americans? I\'d like a different system of course, other than our current Extreme-Right vs. Extreme-Left one.

hem hem, to us your system is more like Extreme Right vs Right (in fact to me it would be Extreme extreme right vs extreme right bbut people around me think I\'m a bit extreme so .... :) )

Can you tell me where the money that Bush and Kerry have to advertise come from ? well no matter, let\'s say that Bush has X thousands $ and Kerry Y thousands $.  How many candidates do you want ? 10 ? ok let\'s do the math :

(X+Y)/10 = much more than needed for one person to advertise.

USA are bigger than France ? Well I guess most of the ads are done by TV aren\'t they ?  Then it\'s simple each candidate has 15min a day on a national chanel to explain his program. I\'m not sure it will be that much more expansive to do that in USA than in France I think TVs are the same, you just have a bigger network and more chanels !

to sum up : you don\'t have the right to change the government of a country if the UN disagree (as it always did when you attacked anyone up to now), you don\'t have the right to sell or give weapons to anyone, you don\'t have the right to manipulate other countries with your economic power (i mean England, Spain and so on...), and for god sake YOU DONT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DROP ST EMILION (french wine) IN THE SEWERS JUST BECAUSE WE DISAGREE WITH YOU !!!!!!!!! (but you can call your french fries whatever you want I dont care :)

Anything else to say, feel free to talk, we\'re not in USA, you don\'t take any risk ;) (just teasing of course :) )
there\'s no place like 203.81.47.91

Waylander

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1562
  • Constantly correct since 1988
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #55 on: September 09, 2004, 12:13:38 am »
[QUOTE ]insert quote [/QUOTE ]

is how you Quote but no space between E and ]

Love Actualy-Favorite scene- Englands PM shuts up American President (was portrayed as an annoying character) :P

Anyways, yeah, pro-US vs.  anti-US convos happen too often on these forums and used to in game :P ...sooo, lets stop this one here
<Jeraphon>oh khado
<Jeraphon>you so khrazy

Xil|sleeps: I love cadoras

Waylander, A.K.A: Cadoras, Khado, Nurahk, Armeen, Nostra ... God.

Monketh

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1674
  • aka GovernmentAgent, CorporateAgent
    • View Profile
    • Niihama.ws
(No subject)
« Reply #56 on: September 09, 2004, 12:42:50 am »
One thing first; (I\'m on the go and don\'t have much time to reply)

Yeeehaw!  They have every right to dump your fancy wine, so long as they paid for it.  It\'s part of their Civil Rights!

Don\'t remind me about the whole \"Freedom Fries\" thing...
Ugh...

Edit: Oh, and use of terrorist tactics is NEVER justified, it ruins the cause it is associated with.  I know the Quran isn\'t evil, but there are a lot of people who will think it is because of idiot terrorists.
I would have supported an Ultimatum in Najaf that said \"Get out in 24 hours, or we\'ll turn your freakin\' mosque into a Mushroom-cloud!\".  He would have to, to maintain any support among the muslim community.
(Unless, of course, they\'re -all- crazy.)
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 12:46:36 am by Monketh »
The key to manipulative bargaining is to ask for something twice as big as what you want, then smile and nod when you are talked down to your original wish. You are still young, my apprentice, and have much to learn in the ways of the force. -UtM

Seytra

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2052
  • No system can compensate lack of common sense.
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #57 on: September 09, 2004, 03:01:01 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Monketh
Quote

Of course, most of you think that US is the most powerful country in the world and that therefor it has to take risks to protect itself from terrosism, but wake up ! why is there so much murders and terrorism threat in US ? because you are seeing the world like a place where america should reign !


Damn straight we do, we do not want to be controlled by outside interests, nobody smaller\'n us is going to tell us what to do.  Certainly not terrorists, certainly not Liberal Europe (Liberal Europe here denotes Liberals in Europe, not all of Europe).

And this is exactly why I despise of you so much. You as America. You as all who have this opinion. You as you, Monketh (sorry, this statement of yours ticked me over. I thought you\'d be more moderate on this subject, but maybe you\'ve changed, or maybe I misinterpreted you on the other thread).

The statement of yours can be rephrased to
\"We don\'t care about anyone except ourselves unless they can bully us into submission.\", which can be rephrased as
\"We\'re utterly selfish.\"

And indeed this is what makes America: selfishness. You are always saying \"it\'s for the good of you all\" but in fact, it\'s only for your own good.

You force treaties upon others by threatening with embargoes, but these treaties further your economy at the expense of the \"partner\"\'s economy. (FTAs, anyone?)

You insist on others to bow to the rules you imposed or agreed upon if it helps your economy, yet you arbitraily violate those same rules if it helps your economy.

You are bigoted in everything you say and do. You go to war with some weak poor country for the unproven and totally made-up reason that they have WMD. Once this has been proven to be wrong, you then claim that it was \"because they had an evil dictator\".
Yet, there are and have been several other countries where WMD can be made or brought just as easily as in said country, who also happen to have evil dictators, but you don\'t care about them. The only difference, as much as it has been repeated, is oil.

You are constantly lying to the world.

Your much-praised \"American way of life\" is, in fact, a parasite\'s way of life.

Your usage of the word \"liberal\" as something stupid or bad or both shows that you\'re using rhetorics to undermine the credibility or reduce the seriousness of the ones you don\'t agree with. You don\'t disprove their point, instead you try to ridicule them to get others to ignore that they actually might have a valid point. \"Liberal tree-huggers\" comes to mind.



Having said this, I of course do not mean to say that America or any other country should bow to anyone else just for the sake of it. No, certainly not. What I request off the self-proclaimed \"greatest nation on earth\" is that it listens to reason and that it binds itself to the same rules as everyone else. I furthermore request that it acts in ways that can, especially in the long run, be regarded as \"responsible\". This doesn\'t mean that you need to stop using cars, but it does mean that you need to reduce pollution and to accept a slight decrease in quality of life just as anybody else does. All of us (save the 3rd world) have been living off scarce resources way too generously for at least 100 years. We need to stop this. Now. Immediately. We need to switch to regenerative sources (not just energy) now. If we cannot do so (as is obvious since technology isn\'t ready yet) we need to reduce usage of non-regenerative sources. Now. And everyone can help  by finding some simple things that don\'t have much impact on life.

Also, I totally know that any other country is also selfish, but, unlike you, they didn\'t yet have the chance to prove they are not irresponsible, and therefore they, unlike you, have not failed. So therefore, unlike you, they still have the benefit of doubt.

Would I want ultimate power? Sure. Would I become corrupted by it? Most likely. Should I, therefore, have said power? No.

Not that it matters as you already said you don\'t care, but still I want to make it official that I disagree by heart.

Quote
Originally posted by Monketh
The big threat is Nuclear Terrorism, it isn\'t a threat right now, but you can imagine what will happen when it happens.  Terrorists must be exterminated now to prevent these future mass atrocities.  The way to do that is setting up democracy, which checks itself, and backing it against armed takeover by etremists.


You who don\'t even have a democracy, and who even less control your government, are not the ones to install such a system anywhere except at home. If anything, the world has to decide, and for this the best approximation is the UN.
I\'m not saying it\'ll fail, but does the right outcome justify the wrong reasons and approach? I don\'t think it does.

Also, there will always be terrorism because there will always be power-hungry ppl. who don\'t care about anyone else, who are supported by sheep-minded ppl. who follow them to be able to live their warped fantasies of being fighters for a good cause or just to feel powerful or whatever. The only thing that can stop it is everybody questioning everything and always acting responsibly, because this way, you can catch madmen before they can do anything big and there will be no followers to aid them. This includes terrorists as well as presidents.

A democracy surely helps, but the people must be willing to exert their control of it, which takes considerable effort,  otherwise it will slowly degenerate into a currupt system just as any other form of government. Evidence AFAICS shows that this is happening to every major democracy as we type. Maybe ppl. are not mature enough for any society. Maybe I\'m just misinterpreting what\'s happening, maybe it has always been the way it currently is, which would be sad but better than a collapse of democracy.

While I believe that a responsible, caring dictator would be way better than a self-centered, bureaucratic, corrupt democracy, I\'d prefer a responsible, caring democracy, but this may just be what I\'m used to, because there actually are benefits in reduced government size.

Unless something really good happens, some day, there will be a nuke (or equivalent weapon) in the hands of a terrorist who uses it. All we can do is try hard to delay this day.

Quote
Originally posted by Monketh
I would have supported an Ultimatum in Najaf that said \"Get out in 24 hours, or we\'ll turn your freakin\' mosque into a Mushroom-cloud!\".

AFAIK, a mushroom cloud is the result of a nuclear explosion. No nuke should be used ever again. If anything, I\'d like to see a crater or something.
Also, I\'m not sure how the public would react if you actually did create said crater. It might just give the terrorists a boost in sympathy. :(
« Last Edit: September 09, 2004, 03:10:17 am by Seytra »

Kanon

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #58 on: September 09, 2004, 02:03:51 pm »
I\'m from Australia, and from where I sit, we as a general population have a pretty good lifestyle, and most seem to like our current government. I don\'t! From where I sit, we are about to/ just have signed a trade agreement with the US. Can\'t wait to see where that takes us!!! And, our government too, was convinced from (as it later turns out) false info. on WMD that it was a good idea to go to war. I want to apologise now to anyone who was affected negatively in the war on Iraq (aka the war on terrorism)
The country, on the plus side, is free. But my question is for how long?
As for governments and who we (all countries, not just Australia) should elect, one is as good (or bad) as another these days aren\'t they?
In CB we trust!

leji

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #59 on: September 09, 2004, 02:20:43 pm »
Well, Seytra seems to have the same opinion as me and he\'s much better than me at expressing himself, so I\'ll let him continue to try to explain to those stubborn americans (not that they are all stubborn but some of them seem to be :( ) what is real life out of america.

Good luck Seytra!
there\'s no place like 203.81.47.91