Even though the original objective has been met, I\'d like to say that I don\'t recommend debian for beginners. The install is very inflexible and you occasionally need to use the shell to make it do stuff it doesn\'t by itself.
Furthermore, it\'s not as user-friendly in terms of configuration and hardware detection.
Also, you should consider using the testing branch (\"sarge\") for a workstation system, because the sta(b)le branch (\"woody\") is so outdated that you\'ll have a hard time to compile things on it and chanches are slim to find any recent software precompiled for it. It is therefore mostly usable for servers that don\'t require additional and / or recent software (NFS servers, for example, samba is only version 2.2.3a-13, which works fine with windows 9x and NT, but doesn\'t with the samba 3.x client, I use NFS instead (maybe someone here knows why the two won\'t work together?)).
I chose it because it\'s \"pure\" (in terms of license and support) and because it is easy to keep up to date (especially security-wise, but only the stable branch gets timely security updates).
Note that you\'ll require a broadband connection if you\'re running testing, because it updates quite often and may download >=100 MB depending on how much stuff you have installed. Of course, you don\'t have to update if the stuff you have works for you.
Migrating from woody to sarge is possible, but it caused problems with config files for me so it took a while to get it back to being usable, and still get the occasional \"configlet invalid\" error, so you\'re better off installing from scratch.