Originally posted by Owl
Then perhaps they should have played, or RPGed as you put elsewhere! Perhaps they could use thier E-mail adresses and post messages that way.
You\'re joking, right? Are you
actually proposing that in the MMO
RPG called \"PS\" should be no RP taking place, but instead
via email? If yes, I only have one answer for you:
NO WAY!
PS is an RPG, not a chat. Therefore, RPG takes precedence before chat, and therefore chat is only to be tolerated if it does not disturb any RP going on. How about the idle chatters taking their talkative presence to something appropriate, like
a chat? It is not the duty of the RPGers to tolerate chatters, it\'s the duty of the chatters not to disturb the RPGers.
Originally posted by Owl
if everyone is too busy RPGin\' in a PUBLIC game then the fault is theirs!
Please tell me what \"public\" has to do with anything? Does \"public\" mean \"a place without rules\"? No, it doesn\'t. In fact, you\'re more restricted in public places than in private ones in what you may and may not do. PS is designated (IMO absolutely clearly) as RPG, and therefore the RPers have
every right to busy themselves with RP as much as they wish. AND they also have every right to demand not to be disturbed, so it is
entirely the chatter\'s fault!
Originally posted by Owl
The /shout ..... command is used all the time whenever i\'m online there\'s always people using it and no one really bothers or makes a big deal out of it!
Therefore...? Just because usually there is no RP going on or the RPers don\'t feel overly disturbed by the /shout chatting doesn\'t mean that suddenly every RPer needs to endure it. In fact, it is a nice gesture of RPers to not tell chatters off, but they are in no way obliged not to, even if they did not in the past.
Just because in the cinema the ppl. didn\'t mind you talking doesn\'t mean that talking in this cinema suddenly becomes acceptable and that future visitors need to endure your talking.