Okay, firstly where did you all get this strange idea that you can\'t compare a PC to a console? Why not, tell me in 50 words or less, why a comparison is not possible.
There is nothing stopping a comparison, no reason to i try and stop it.
Thesedays, consoles are mini PCs, and very powerful ones at that, they can do many things a PC can. A console is no longer an 8-bit device purely for games. You could run a business off a console with the right programs.
So that sillyness out of the way...
1. PC is by far greater, the only aspect it loses to a console is gaming, though First Person Shooters, Real Time Strategy games, and Role Playing Games, are far superior on a PC. It is much faster for one, and easier to configure to your tastes. Multiplayer was more fun on a PC (until the console networks), but easier on a console.
2. Playstation 2. Reason, Final Fantasy series! (don\'t even mention Crystal Chronicles, or Tactics Advance). Also a great selection of games, and IMO the only system to tap all it\'s resources in game production, it was inferior to the N64, but still produced better games.
3. X-Box (hear the cries of the Linux people?), this is easily the most versatile console, regardless of your thoughts on Microoft. No longer do we need to play games with horrible soundtracks, why you ask? Upload your own I say! It is much faster than the PS2, but the games on the PS2 are superior. Has a big internal HD, with the option of buying a separate HD, none of the others have the internal. This negates the use of memory cards, IMO a good thing! Here, PS2 cards were $60... that\'s almost as much as a game.
4. Gamecube, I don\'t like this console. The only good things Nintendo ever did were the NES and SNES (Both had Final Fantasies on them!) The games on those consoles far surpass anything today IMO. Also Zelda! That\'s how it made my list.
I compared PCs with Consoles, deal with it.
Why would you put Linux on a PS2?
Oh well, to each his own.
-Tyralus Shadowdancer