>>>Only couples that will in some way give back to society should be allowed to marry.<<<
How can you tell if they will give back to society? Is there a contract they have to sign?
>>>They give back 2.3 children with at the least some high school education who are ready to take their places in society.<<<
Is this a proven fact? What of those who never plan to have children, as I don\'t? Will that mean I\'m not going to be allowed to marry? And what of those who give back to society rapists, murderers, and thieves? What of those who marry, then are abusive to their children? What of children that suffer from neglect?
What perfect little world do you live in, ArcaneFalcon, and can you share your sercret path?
>>>What do homosexual couples give back for their benefits? _Nothing_.<<<
Oh really? So if a couple doesn\'t have children, then they are meaningless to society? There is nothing else they can achieve, no greatness they can share with the world? Is that what relationships are - baby-making agreements?
>>>Why do so many homosexuals start out straight, dating people of the opposite sex.<<<
Maybe because that is what society teaches them?
Why do so many atheists start out as theists?
>>>Why do so many homosexuals turn straight later in life, going on to marry and have a normal family?<<<
Maybe because that is what society wants of them, so they repress their own urges and think that they are \'normal\' and happy?
>>>People single them out because they are a threat to society, because they attack the institution of marriage, and for many (including me) it goes against their morals and beliefs.<<<
You know what the real threat to society is? Closed thinking.
*edit* Reading ArcaneFalcon\'s post again, it shows just far too many faults to ignore. Homosexual marriage stressing society? Come on! And what if they \"turn straight\" later and marry? Same amount of people, same received benefits, just different sexes. Ridiculous argument.