Author Topic: What's your favourite OS  (Read 8271 times)

Rulzern

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #75 on: February 01, 2005, 10:18:05 pm »
An OS based on Sid (aka. unstable)? Are you sure it\'s not based off Sarge (aka. testing)?

Unstable is good, if you don\'t mind a few things being broken and doing some stuff yourself, testing is good if you want a system that works for most things and is reasonably up to date, and stable is for people who want everything to work, and don\'t mind a few old packages.

EDIT: Nevermind, I just read up on it, it seems like a more desktop-oriented/user-friendly distro than Debian, with regular releases that spring from a snapshot of Sid. Looks neat, maybe I\'ll install it some day. :p
« Last Edit: February 01, 2005, 10:22:06 pm by Rulzern »
Thanks a lot Venge...

Xordan

  • Crystal Space Developer
  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 3845
  • For God and the Empire
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #76 on: February 01, 2005, 10:32:21 pm »
Just to add my views for a second time:

GENTOO w0000t!!!!

Harkin

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 466
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #77 on: February 02, 2005, 12:11:46 am »
for the first and last time, why dont you just install Debian, right from the source, no clones? Sarge works great and a lot of the packages are quite up-to-date ... working a lot better than ubuntu and its \"security\" features... HAH!
I am just a figment of you imagination and a byproduct of the worse accident ever... ... or so my mommy says!
Imagine your life ripped to hundreds of shreds, then think about how you just stepped in poo, welcome to my world.

-Scott

JellyWerker

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 451
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #78 on: February 02, 2005, 06:16:29 am »
I think I posted on this thread before, but here is an updated list: (from best to worst)

redhat 9
Mac osx
fedora core 2 (had some sound problems, other than that, nice distro)
lfs (pain in the butt, but nice when finished! )
gentoo (base install was 2004.2, but it updates to current.)
fedora core 3
fedora core 1
Suse Linux (That\'s soo-za, not soose! :D )
mac os (9 and lower)
sky os (a nice linux based alternative os)
ubuntu (warty warthog)
debian sarge
debian woody
Mandrake Linux
vidalinux (nice when the installer worked :P )
(insert other linux\'s here)
ms-dos 6.22 (oldskool! )
windows 2000 pro
windows 95
windows xp pro sp2 (fully updated, otherwise is a piece of s***)
windows 98 and 98se

Note: These are installed distros, I don\'t want to take up 2 pages with the live cds I like :) )

Edit: Oops! I forgot to put suse and mandrake on the list!
« Last Edit: February 02, 2005, 06:18:50 am by JellyWerker »
Warning: Prone to common sense.


dorbian

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 684
  • Yeah no not for me that is...
    • View Profile
    • Mindless Insanity
(No subject)
« Reply #79 on: February 02, 2005, 05:51:44 pm »
Windows 2000 or 2000 kernel based
RedHat Linux
Windows 3.11
MacOS 7.5 or X
Windows 2003 server enterprise edition
Mandrake Linux

Probably Gentoo should be in the list also, when i get it set up correctly, just having some problems atm :P

oh annah, the 2k3 server aint an improved version of 2k server, cause the kernell is completely different and rewritten, so i have to disagree with you on that.

Induane

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1287
  • What should I put here?
    • View Profile
    • Vaalnor Inc.
(No subject)
« Reply #80 on: February 03, 2005, 05:44:08 am »
Problems with Debian:

Install fails on machines for no apparant reason.  Then works spontainiously on the 140th try.  I tried downloading a new ISO, checking MD5 SUMS, and burning new CD\'s.  But then for some reason it started working and the install went ok.  

First Load: No X.  Greeted with a console login.  Startx fails.  Worse still, the ethernet card wasn\'t setup correctly and I couldn\'t connect to an apt server to try updates or anything.  Eventually, I downloaded a new XFree86 Package, and burned it onto a CD and installed it.  Then it worked.  Finally, I was in.  GDM looked nice, but a rude surprise was waiting.  No Gnome in the sessions list.  WHAT?  GDM was there... odd.  Reinstalled from another downloaded set of packages.  Added it to the rc file manually.  Bingo - I\'m in.  Kernel panic on restart.   Hmm.... Start over... Big mess, didn\'t bother trying to fix it all, and installed SuSE.

Similar problems on my other box, but it did have Gnome as a session.   Good news.  Crashed - I mean full on system freezes, (which almost never happens in linux) - crashed several times.  Dumped it for Yoper because it had apt also.  

Ubuntu - worked on the first try on both machines.  Stable, no crashes yet at all.  Only quirk I noticed is that it ships with firefox .9 instead of 1.0, but a quick change to the apt.sources list and an apt-get fixed that.  Also. seems more responsive, but that could be from the more up to date kernel.  

On a side note, Yoper was great.  Fast, clean, easy.  Odd thing was that it got slower and slower the more I used it.  I have had that problem on other KDE based distro\'s.  Any idea why?

PS worked in linux great, on wine at first, then natively.

Rulzern

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #81 on: February 03, 2005, 07:09:49 pm »
Sounds like the PEBCAK to me (Did you try installing with the 2.6 kernel that is supplied with the install CD(s)? That tends to be more cooperative.), I\'ve never had a debian install fail, and I\'ve installed quite a few of them. I have had a lot of problems with more desktop-oriented/user-friendly distros, albeit none as big as I\'ve had when installing windows.

Debian isn\'t amongst the most user-friendly distributions, atleast not for the install, but it has a tendancy of just working, no matter how much crap you do to it. ;)
Thanks a lot Venge...

dimaq

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 87
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #82 on: February 03, 2005, 11:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Induane
Problems with Debian:

Install fails on machines for no apparant reason.


You fail.

Induane

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1287
  • What should I put here?
    • View Profile
    • Vaalnor Inc.
(No subject)
« Reply #83 on: February 04, 2005, 03:52:36 am »
Quote

Origionally posted by: dimaq

You fail.



Perhaps, but I have never had a problem installing any other distro with the exception of linux from scratch.  Well, I\'ve had problems, but never one I could\'t solve until my debian install problems.  They were just strange, and I\'m not sure the cause.  Still, I\'ve been using linux for several years so I have an okay idea about troubleshooting the systems.  

Don\'t get me wrong, I like what debian has done with the os, I just resent that I couldn\'t get it to run on my systems.  It has so many packages available, which I know, since I setup the Ubuntu apt.sources to use the debian repitories also.  There are more there for it than any other I could find, including yoper, which had a nice selection, and SuSE, which was good too, though not very well updated.  Apt on SuSE was a clunky add on, which never worked that well, but it did have a nice selection of packages.  

Still, I\'m open to help or suggestions on what I could do to resolve the issues I had with debian.  Your comment dimaq, with all due respect, wasn\'t helpful, it was just rude.

Nimfis Altmer

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #84 on: February 04, 2005, 03:37:49 pm »
Anything But mac and windows
O RLY!?

emileej

  • Wayfarer
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
OS X
« Reply #85 on: February 04, 2005, 03:46:00 pm »
OS X

I\'ve used Apple computers since I was 5 and still use them. Even so I have used the PC/windows platform for many years, since I wanted to learn programming and the only option I saw on the mac at the time was Code Warrior which was pretty expensive.

OS X suprised me as the programmers dream (this programmer anyways) since everything is as you expect it (unless youre right pff the windows platform in which case you expect everything to be as one would otherwise not expect it to be).

\"No games for mac\" <- myth

\"Mac is st00pid. Fuck all you mac users - youre all n00bs\" <- Bite me

Thankyou

NIm

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #86 on: February 06, 2005, 06:29:44 am »
Debian Linux , all the way :) I never had any probems installing it, or any programs. ran RedHat for a while, though
I keep a copy of winxp in the closet for some LAN parties.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2005, 06:30:47 am by NIm »

macpete

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #87 on: February 10, 2005, 11:50:22 am »
I love OS X and I miss BeOS (a bit).

Harkin

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 466
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #88 on: February 10, 2005, 12:10:28 pm »
i used a net intstall sarge version, no hitches, just dont use stable, use sarge, stable is just too old or most machines, like i couldnt configure my ethernet card because \"it was being used or busy\" and XFree86 was too old to run my vid card  :\\.... only thing i hate about debian is XFree86... wish they\'d switch to X.org ... but any way debian has given me the least problems of any linux distro besides ubuntu, just ubuntu lacked many options i needed...
I am just a figment of you imagination and a byproduct of the worse accident ever... ... or so my mommy says!
Imagine your life ripped to hundreds of shreds, then think about how you just stepped in poo, welcome to my world.

-Scott

Clover

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #89 on: February 10, 2005, 02:36:20 pm »
Win XP with Knoppix in the cd drive.
I\'m too much of a gamer to drop Windows.
Ordo Illuminatis
Master in the House of Shadow
Official Tavern Kitty

__Taking an extended leave of absense from PS.