What happens when an unstoppable force hits an unmovable force?

[Noctis Lamnia]

Discuss.

[Efflixi Aduro]

Well lets see. Noting is unstoppable and nothing is imovable. There we go, the situation is impossable and the discussion is over.

[Black_rose]

the unstoppable force simpily phases through the unmovible

[Noctis Lamnia]

I\'m not asking if it COULD happen.

I\'m asking WHAT would happen.

[Black_rose]

yep, think of it, put ice in your hand then put water in your hand

they ice will not slip through your fingers but the water will, why??? water moves faster on a molecular scale so it is able to be more flexible

[Black_rose]

ok, what about this, the unstoppable force would strech a hole in the unmovible and simpily just pas through the hole, the hole would then dissapear

[Efflixi Aduro]

Originally posted by Noctis Lamnia
I\'m not asking if it COULD happen.

I\'m asking WHAT would happen.

Look. Accoring to physics it\'s impossable.  If it\'s impossable there is no way to explain it because there is nothing to explain it.

[Kixie]

According to physics there are no unstoppable forces, or especially unmovable ones. An object has to rest on something, it cant just float on its own in nothing and have any resistance. Therefore there are no unmovable objects, and especially no unstoppable ones. This conversation is hereby void of any logic whatsoever.

[seperot]

its unmovable but not unbreakable.....  the moving force simply brakes through the center... simple realy

[Cybio Kingfist]

Nothing says it has to break through the CENTER I mean pssh, come on, use your imagination.

[Noctis Lamnia]

Originally posted by Kixie
According to physics there are no unstoppable forces, or especially unmovable ones. An object has to rest on something, it cant just float on its own in nothing and have any resistance. Therefore there are no unmovable objects, and especially no unstoppable ones. This conversation is hereby void of any logic whatsoever.

Ah, science, good ol\' science.

Why must we be constrained by your forceful bonds of unopeness?

Why must we be constrained to a single strain of thought according to your \"laws\"?

Why?

[Kixie]

Originally posted by Noctis Lamnia
Ah, science, good ol\' science.

Why must we be constrained by your forceful bonds of unopeness?

Why must we be constrained to a single strain of thought according to your \"laws\"?

Why?

Because when you step off them you become insane. Simple as that. You know the people that step off the pedistle of science do? They tell you that a copper pipe filled with salt and rocks, stirred for 34 minutes and put in a microwave will power the earth for 45 million years. Thats what happens. Seriously, when you stray to far from the laws, you rmind starts messin\' with you.

[Kithplana]

If, hypothetically, one force is \"unstoppable\" and the other \"unmovable\", then in the event of a collision both would be tested to see if both qualities are true. If one is weaker than the other in their un* ability, eventually the one with the stronger ability will win out and the weaker one will be overcome (the unstoppable object will stop or the unmovable object will shift). If they are equal, both would stop doing their thing: the unstoppable force would cease to move, and the unmovable object would become movable.

[Efflixi Aduro]

Originally posted by Kixie
According to physics there are no unstoppable forces, or especially unmovable ones. An object has to rest on something, it cant just float on its own in nothing and have any resistance. Therefore there are no unmovable objects, and especially no unstoppable ones. This conversation is hereby void of any logic whatsoever.

Exactly.
So if you wanna try to solve somthing that can\'t exist go ahead. You might just end up like stalin. (nuts)  

[Harkin]

when they collides a paradox happens and the universe ends.... there take that!!

  sorta like a very huge explosively powerful \'big bang\' end to the universe... muahahaha