Well, you just missed this:
http://www.igpp.ucla.edu/cseol/it was awesome. So, this is a subject dear to my heart. I love the \"origins\" debate, but I don\'t like making enemies that way. (Other ways are fine)
Look, many people will claim to have some sort of answer they don\'t really have. Noone actually knows how life started. If you\'re interested, examine all the available data and draw a conclusion for yourself. If you do this mystically, fine. However, if you want to be able to make predictions and have a useful model at the end of the day, you\'ll want to do this scientifically.
Of course, the term \"useful\" is subjective. I take here to mean something like curing disease or extending life, which the theory underlying evolution and modern biology has been able to do.
If you want to go into science, you are needed. We have plenty of pundits who want to tell you what they
think about the origins of life, but there are far fewer people who can actually
prove what they say. Do you want to be the former or the latter?