Originally posted by Kiva
If any of you guys ever bothered to invent something, I\'m pretty sure you would be happy that patents exist. But then again, patenting in our world can get quite out of control, where people patent grass or the smell of burnt wood (or whatever...).
\"Yeap, that\'ll be a fiver for surviving that fire there. You breathed in my patented product, so cough it up!\"
First I would be happy if I had the money required to get a patent. (Even little companies hasnt the money required).
Then patent on program means patents on idea. For example in USA there is a patent on the possibility to add a \"buy\" button on your website. Thats what I heard...
Patents has allowed Creative Labs to force id software to add their EAX sound in thier product thanks to a patent they had on a work which is (moreover) not theirs. Still whats said.
Do you like openoffice? because if patents pass the .doc documents will be patented by MS -> you will be forced to buy MS Office to create a .doc file even if openoffice creators never cheated and re-created the .doc architecture legaly.
Off course when you are a little scientist and when a big company steal your work there is no problem to create a patent and tell you bye bye then...
I know university and french great ingineers schools are known because some teachers create patents on their pupils projects...
In each case patent kill creativity. in each case patents are bad because if you arent rich you become weak (someone rich can have the patent and say you - not officially - thank you after...).
In USA a guy learnt his own DNA was patented.
In European parliament, some politicals said it was a threat for the freedom of expression.
-> program are only logical ideas
example :
-------------------
if something
then something else
-------------------
software patents are the first step before ideas patent.
In european parliament, the defensors of the patents said it was a way to save little companies. The ones who refuse the patents answer : do you know a lot of little companies which are able to pay the price of a patent easily? Off course the answer was no, there isnt.
patents voting of the parliament has been ignored by the commission - even if it was one of the most actively defended/refused law. Then the commission tried to vote it secretly by adding it on the schedule at the very last time to be sure there will be no opponents. Poland was in favour of software patent but Poland prime minister came to say \"you can do that everywhere you want but not in my country\". It has been tried something like 3 or 4 times in others countries (each time prime minister of the country came ..and so one).
The minister council tried to make this law pass.
Soem european parliament members said some companies like MS was very annoying and stressed the parliament member. Some were forced to take holiday (i dunno how to say that... Im sorry my english is very primary one).
In USA, some people took the justice and said patents were a \"crime against the constitution\". Justice is overtaken (too many people are complaining).
Do you know how many softwares linux is representing ? If there were a patent for each linux program it would be an amazing price. Patents will kill every little programmer\'s softwares and every free or opensource softwares: if its free how can you buy a patent? so say good bye to every free program you know (Mozilla, PHP, openoffice, firefox, amsn, gaim, ...). And will Talad be ready to pay between 10000 and 20000 euros for ps ? because one day a guy will create a patent for the use of the crafting in a mmorpg... or anything else...
Off course it looks like something bad... isnt it ?