Author Topic: Horrible...  (Read 2052 times)

Suno_Regin

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2445
    • View Profile
Horrible...
« on: October 24, 2005, 03:03:18 am »
These penalties are VERY annoying, I challenged someone to a duel, and they declined, but the problem was, I couldn\'t challenge ANYONE for ten minutes, but at the time I didn\'t know this...So when I challenged someone DIFFERENT, I got killed, and lost 10 advisor points...

Especially being an Enkidukai, this is completely unfair, Not only do I lose the points, but I have to walk back to Hydlaa from Akkaio now, for a very ignorant reason...>.>

r.guppy

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2005, 03:07:40 am »
New rules :)
 try reading 0.3.012 ready. by Talad, thats why he posted  :))

Cha0s

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1860
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2005, 03:49:47 am »
Out of curiosity, is there a pop-up explaining these rules? I think that while potentially annoying, a pop-up explaining the rules after a level 2 violation would be a good thing. Most people RPing duels should have agreed to them before hand (in tells) anyway, so this shouldn\'t affect most people.
Cha0s
Mac OS X Forum Moderator
In-Game Roleplay Forum Moderator
Please search and skim existing threads before posting!

Suno_Regin

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2445
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2005, 04:18:35 am »
Won\'t effect -most- people, but what about the people it does effect? One of the many defects to being an Enkidukai...

Seytra

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2052
  • No system can compensate lack of common sense.
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2005, 04:21:30 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Suno_Regin
Won\'t effect -most- people, but what about the people it does effect? One of the many defects to being an Enkidukai...

No, that\'s one of the many defects of being an OOC PKer.

Tarcaldy

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2005, 05:11:51 am »
quote form server ?
* Re-wrote invite spam-blocker:
- Now only triggered on declines, so as to not block legitimate invites.
- Penalties now increase with each decline:
1) 1 min lockout
2) 5 min + warning
3) 10 min + 10 advisor point fine + 10 duel point fine, if duel spam + death
4) 30 point fine(s) + death + kick from server
- Penalties expire with gameplay time, and can be lowered by getting an accept from a player with no penalties and a enough advisor points.
- Penalty level is saved to the player\'s account entry in the database, so repeat offenders can\'t escape it. (relog resets to 3rd level).............
* Exiting the death realm now spawns you at your racial spawn point. ?

I see this as the possible extinction of a race. By trying to solve a spam problem.  I am not disagreeing with these changes but it is unfare to the Enkidukai race that they would have to travel all that distance again because they went to death realm. As we all know there is not much to do at their spawn point. To be fair everyone should be spawned at the Enkidukai spawn point. Also notice the penalties and what they realy mean. To me not much so I lose advisor points and duel points. Hmm, I dont have any now, in fact my duel points are negetive and I dont use /advisor to help char. So I go to death realm and have -advisor/duel points and need to relog if at penalty 4 to set back at penalty 3. Boy does that every hurt me.
Just my 2 trias worth. O, by the way does this  mean that the refuse all invites is no longer available.

Karyuu

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 9341
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2005, 05:20:52 am »
Refuse all invites option is definitely still available for use.

In time, all of the different races will have vastly different spawn points. The Enkidukai city was created as a first major \"race\" center, so they get to enjoy a far-away spawn first. Fear not, others will follow ;) Akkaio isn\'t a dead city at all - many players are beginning to migrate there, set up shops, and enjoy a lot of RP that doesn\'t suffer from many of the problems that beset Hydlaa - influx of OOC chat, clueless newbies, and (remains of) plaza duels.
Judge: Are you trying to show contempt for this court, Mr Smith?
Smith: No, My Lord. I am attempting to conceal it.

darkw00t

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 271
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2005, 08:21:56 am »
There should be a max of 3 duel invites (accepted or not) within 5 minutes, and this is quite unfair to Enki\'s but i kind of see a reason for this
Eleloy Shadowfrost

zanzibar

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 6523
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2005, 08:56:59 am »
It\'s not unfair to anyone.  There\'s no reason that you should be killed if you aren\'t sending out multiple duels without warning or reason.
Quote from: Raa
Immaturity is FTW.

Nikodemus

  • Prospects
  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1808
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2005, 12:13:52 pm »
There is problem in this new rule. Some certain person who don\'t challange others, won\'t see it, simply because he won\'t test. =P

Example:
Person A have personal reason to kill person B \"I challange you! Prepare for death\"
Person B declines \"I will call guards if you try somethink on me!\"
Then person B realizes that he isn\'t that poor fighter comparing to the offender \"But afterall... lets see whos better. \" Also \"ooc: You Challange me, because you wanted to fight\"
person A \"So be it!\" Person A cant challange B, because of weird rule which magically won\'t let him to do what he want.

Additionally Suno says, that if one person decline your challange, you will be punished for all challanges to all other people, so:
Person A and B takes part in dueling tournament. Few fights are happening in the ame time. It hapens that A and B has just won a duel and the next fight will be beatwen them. They have to wait few long minutes, before they can fight. Why they have to wait?

Additionally mistakes happens and one can decline by mistake/ challange wrong player and so on. You will ask: how it is possible? Answer: because of human mistake.

If I was going to propose some solution for challange spam. I would solve this in IC way, or OOC which dont inerfere in RP. current OOC solution, surely does interfere.



What you can failure tommorow, failure today.


Better click for shiny stylez Help me with images!

r.guppy

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2005, 12:40:19 pm »
In answer to Nikodemus

 I blame all players how run around challenging all and sundry for the new rules.
 
 As for your little Example: challenge one if it had been in chat rather than auto problem solved, so the lessen to learn hear is talk first.
 
 Second point: you would have to rest in real life before fighting again so not unreasonable to expect to wait before fight begins.

 Third point: Yes mistakes happen but a few minutes wait can fly by if you chat instead of just standing there.

DaveG

  • Forum Addict
  • *
  • Posts: 2058
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2005, 12:58:12 pm »
Quote
Quote from server\'s main page:
* Re-wrote invite spam-blocker:
- Now only triggered on declines, so as to not block legitimate invites.
- Penalties now increase with each decline:
1) 1 min lockout
2) 5 min + warning
3) 10 min + 10 advisor point fine + 10 duel point fine, if duel spam + death
4) 30 point fine(s) + death + kick from server
- Penalties expire with gameplay time, and can be lowered by getting an accept from a player with no penalties and a enough advisor points.
- Penalty level is saved to the player\'s account entry in the database, so repeat offenders can\'t escape it. (relog resets to 3rd level)

...

* Exiting the death realm now spawns you at your racial spawn point.

Please note, that these are 2 separate things.  I did the spam-blocker, someone else did the spawning.  If you get penalized for spamming and don\'t like where you get sent, tough.


Now, about the whining:

I expected this.  But, simply put, you should be using your words and not the /challenge command.  ASK FIRST.  Say something like \"I challenge you to a duel\", then after they accept use /challenge.  Don\'t just go around challenging everyone you see.  That\'s kind of the point.

There is a warning sent onscreen in red and to the chat window at penalty #2.  If you need specifics on what the penalties are for you to consider stopping, you\'re probably one of the people I made this thing for.


On the subject of penalties:

To get to the point at which you get penalty #3, you need to be declined for an invite 3 times recently.  Frankly, if you were just spam inviting and everyone accepted, that would be allowed.  If you\'re up to level #3, try not challenging for a while... it will expire with gameplay time.  Specifically, if you don\'t challenge at all within the lockout time for the next level up, you\'ll be automatically dropped down one penalty level on your next invite.

example: At level #3 (just had #2, next penalty is #3), wait 10 minutes to invite, you\'ll be bumped down to #2.  Of course, if it\'s a decline, it\'ll go right back up.

And yes, the spam-blocker no longer cares who you\'re inviting.  It only cares about recent declines.  That was a major flaw in the old one, because you could just keep spamming new people.


Edited to add:
Level expiration after having penalty #3 is after half an hour of gameplay time, btw.

About the following comments:
Quote
Quote #1: Originally posted by Nikodemus
Person A have personal reason to kill person B \"I challange you! Prepare for death\"
Person B declines \"I will call guards if you try somethink on me!\"
Then person B realizes that he isn\'t that poor fighter comparing to the offender \"But afterall... lets see whos better. \" Also \"ooc: You Challange me, because you wanted to fight\"
person A \"So be it!\" Person A cant challange B, because of weird rule which magically won\'t let him to do what he want.
Quote
Quote #2: Originally posted by Nikodemus
Additionally Suno says, that if one person decline your challange, you will be punished for all challanges to all other people, so:
Person A and B takes part in dueling tournament. Few fights are happening in the ame time. It hapens that A and B has just won a duel and the next fight will be beatwen them. They have to wait few long minutes, before they can fight. Why they have to wait?
Quote
Quote #3: Originally posted by Nikodemus
Additionally mistakes happens and one can decline by mistake/ challange wrong player and so on. You will ask: how it is possible? Answer: because of human mistake.
Quote
Quote #4: Originally posted by Nikodemus
If I was going to propose some solution for challange spam. I would solve this in IC way, or OOC which dont inerfere in RP. current OOC solution, surely does interfere.

The solutions for #1, #2, and #3 is to simply have the person not in the lockout issue the /challenge command.  If the lockout was due to an honest mistake, it\'s easily remedied.  But in all likelihood, it would only be the 1 or 5 minute lockout, because I don\'t see \"honest mistakes\" happening more than once or twice.

As for #4:  Invite spamming is most certainly OOC, so thus the solution must be.  If you\'re declined enough to complain about these penalties, you have nothing to do with RP.  Deal with it.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2005, 01:54:30 pm by DaveG »

::  PlaneShift Team Programmer  ::

ramlambmoo

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 567
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2005, 02:12:40 pm »
Quote
These penalties are VERY annoying, I challenged someone to a duel, and they declined, but the problem was, I couldn\'t challenge ANYONE for ten minutes, but at the time I didn\'t know this...So when I challenged someone DIFFERENT, I got killed, and lost 10 advisor points...

Especially being an Enkidukai, this is completely unfair, Not only do I lose the points, but I have to walk back to Hydlaa from Akkaio now, for a very ignorant reason...>.>


Maybe you shouldnt be a challenge spammer then.

Nikodemus

  • Prospects
  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1808
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: October 24, 2005, 03:40:36 pm »
DaveG:
Thank you for detailed explanation.
As i understand, one can continue to challange all the time, as long as his/her challanges are accepted.
Also, when someone decline, the challanger can still challange people as long as they accept, but for next decline are penalties.
That is good and don\'t spoiling that much IC solution.
There shouldn\'t be time waiting when both sides agree on fight. By this the 2 situations i descriped are possible.

I only wonder why Suno wrote that he couldn\'t challange anyone. What mean, that when he challanged someone, the challanged person didnt even got popup yesno to confirm or decline.
That isn\'t good solution.

I rather think that Suno has forgotte to mention some details, so i believe you DaveG. Will have to test someday.

Correct me please if i got somethink wrong.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2005, 03:41:00 pm by Nikodemus »



What you can failure tommorow, failure today.


Better click for shiny stylez Help me with images!

Zan

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1944
  • Just a regular guy, with an irregular soul
    • View Profile
    • Photography
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2005, 04:12:03 pm »
In short .. I like those new rules and since I never make challenges unless the roleplay requires fighting with another player I sure won\'t be bothered by them.
Zan Drithor, Member of the Vaalnor Council
Tyrnal Relhorn, Captain of the Vaalguard
Thromdir Shoake, Merchant
Giorn Kleaver, Miner.

Grayne Dholm, Follower of Dakkru