The president will never be the scapegoat for black ops as long as he cooperates--and they always do.
True highrise buildings are designed with built in self destruct explosives AS REQUIRED BY CODE in case the building ever collapses--it will implode to it\'s foundations rather than destroy all the surrounding communities (for 3 to 10 miles with blowout) very devastating with the dominoe effect of more buildings falling. The unplanned part of the implosion is that the system was damaged enough by the explosion on one floor, that it did not detect that the floors above the impact were splayed, and therefore did not activate until a lower floor collapsed from structural meltdown in the heat.
The reason the U.S. and not only the U.S. but also all the western european countries, all the global corporations (China included) would desire Afghanistan and Iraq out of the way is because of the Caspian sea oil pipeline to the Persian Gulf--these two countries opposed it. The future of all of the afforementioed organizations and then some are dependent on the approval and success of this pipeline (unless some very powerful people would approve of polluting the Mediteranean with oil tankers as acceptable = the alternative).
Russia wanted to take over Afghanistan because it was one of the major regions for sourcing money for government black ops in the western world through drug traficking (which the U.S. was number one--largest drug cartel in the world).
Osama bin Laden was hired long ago as an operative by the us government to prevent USSR from overtaking the drug market from the us black ops. All of his \"militia\" were trained and funded by US money up untill the Taliban gained power and shut down all the drug trade in Afghanistan.
The strangest part is that in the 6 months before 9/11 is the enormous amount of money that was channeled from us government accounts to the Al Qaida. Moreover, when this came out on the news, the investigations findings were hushed up accross the board--even if it was an enemy government that paid them (called a risk to national security).
Stranger yet, is how national security has become an excuse to prevent nationwide news coverage. Such as peace protests--such coverage is now considered to be a risk to national security (I guess they don\'t want it to become popular). Also, these new sections of national security law--all reenacted and moreso after 9/11--are used to prevent immediate coverage of many public events and protests (like against WTO, or even anti-Bush). All news coverage is limited to local only--until it is found to not \"disturb the national security\"--such as with public shock, outrage, or even uprising (yeah, like that is really going to happen in an apathetic country like the US is now). Especially peace protests are now limited to local news then slowly spread accross the nation.
***By the way, did anyone in non-local area hear about the 20,000 people march in Pheonix Arizona this past weekend?***
WHY WOULD THE US GOVERNMENT, THE UN, BRITAIN, HUGE GLOBAL CORPORATIONS, ET AL WANT 9/11 TO HAPPEN? (It is not a whole government or politically public action that they have taken, but people in it conducting a push for power.)
First, they never expected so many to be killed in the event--and they never thought rescuers would enter the building.
2--for a mere 3/4 of a billion they hired a scape goat to take the blame and become a world leader and hero of his people.
3--Now they can claim a legitimate way to open the Caspian sea pipline
4--The corporations involved have made over 100 billion dollars since the event through exercises taken in the name of it.
5--The united fascist movement in the United States has regained all of it\'s original authority and then some, making leaps and bounds in the control of American government, people, and the world.
6--Now, every government installled will be a united fascist republic, complete with backing from ________. (Welcome to \"the post war world\")
7--The black ops divisions of the US now have full authority to overthrow and replace all operations which were established during the cold war. These include fascist governments, drug cartels, and even some global corporations who believed they had become big enough to not support the weakening US fascisti regime--which is now the most powerful one in the world, and secret.
The question is--is this really all bad? After all, EVERYTHING the developed world has was acquired through war and oppression (and they still oppress any and all of their own people who oppose them--even killing them if they happen upon enough power to influence a nit). If they had not done these things in the past all the people would have suffered and died quite horribly--that is why they did it--is this why they do it now?
Horrors: the intelligence that knew of the plan, the target, and the perpetrators and knew they were boarding planes in the country. The huge money that was paid from US, British, and other western government accounts to Al Qaida and the Taliban in the 6 to 9 months prior to 9/11--and the closing of the investigational findings which first started discovering these payments (even the one of the FBI hiring Palestinians to attack the US for $25000--isnt the fbi an internal law enforcement and intelligence agency? I never knew the F could stand for \"foreign\"? But nobody really cares--after all, we have to make a living, support our families, etc..)
Note to government: Well, I may have said too much already, but since I haven\'t given sources and I haven\'t revealed anything I didn\'t already see on the news somewhere--THERE IS NO REASON TO INVESTIGATE ME, so leave me alone, and don\'t waste your time. I haven\'t encouraged any riots, burning the bushes, or lynching Cheney for his part in it and the attempted murder of his attorney. [There\'s a joke for you--a man who was raised with guns all around his crib, was taught safe handling of them all his life--accidently shoots his lawyer in the heart. Ask any NRA member about the chances of that happening.
