Peace Demonstrations

[Dumb Woob]

Why can\'t we just send a sniper to assassinate Sudam\'s arse?  I think Bush just wantsa more control over the iraqi government if he does take him out.

[Grey]

We can\'t because we have laws about that kinda thing... sooo... let\'s give the Brits say... 100 million dollars to have their assassins to do it and save 300 billion dollars.  It sounds like corruption, but its very nutritious.  

[Creathor]

how about we pump a guy full of acid send him to iraq and tell him that sadaam is trying to steal his soul

the only problem is if he starts seeing sadaam everywhere.

nevermind, just finished a calculus exam, my brain is working very slowly.

[Dumb Woob]

Originally posted by Grey
We can\'t because we have laws about that kinda thing... sooo... let\'s give the Brits say... 100 million dollars to have their assassins to do it and save 300 billion dollars.  It sounds like corruption, but its very nutritious.  

Lol, Bush is willing to squash our freedoms to ensure freedom (makes since to me)  can\'t he bend the rules a bit???

[AendarCallenlasse]

Hmmmm I\'d like to round up every peace demonstrator and send them over to Iraq so that they can see what Saddam does to his people.  The whole point of going to war with them is to stop them building nuclear weapons.  Now I\'m sure some you know what a nuclear weapon is.  If not I\'ll simplify it...its a big boom....a big boom that kills MILLIONS of people.  Would you rather have us let them build them so that they can use them and kill more people than a war would?

[kinshadow]

Originally posted by Dumb Woob
Why can\'t we just send a sniper to assassinate Sudam\'s arse?  I think Bush just wantsa more control over the iraqi government if he does take him out.

The History Channel had a show on this, but I only caught a part of it.  You can\'t assassinate him because he has multiple \"doubles\".  If the US \"killed\" Saddam, he would just keep popping up ...... like a cockroach.  Besides, even if you did kill all the Saddams it would do no good.  Someone else in his corrupt regime would just pick up the mantle of power.

[Raya]

eweeeeeeeeeeeee cockroaches

this is getting disgusting

let\'s clean up the air a little

I made this pic mod to amuse you guys up a little



Oh I\'m such a silly girl :rolleyes:  

[Vengeance]

I think there is also a fundamental difference between occupying a country to find and destroy its WMDs than to simply take out a nation\'s leader with a sniper bullet.

[Sarth]

AendarCallenlasse wrote:
 

Hmmmm I\'d like to round up every peace demonstrator and send them over to Iraq so that they can see what Saddam does to his people

Perhaps we can round up Americans for a world tour:

How about My Lai ?
500 unarmed civilians raped and murdered by US troops, and attempted cover up
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/Myl_intro.html
http://pathfinder.com/photo/essay/mylai/mylaihp.htm

Or how about the 17 million tons of agent orange dropped on Vietnam, still causing birth defects ?

Guatemala ?
CIA backed death squads
http://www.worldworks.org/ramblings/ciadeath.htm

Actually, lets throw in most of South America for CIA backed and trained deathsquads:
http://alexconstantine.50megs.com/an_international_guide.html

The site below is comprehensive, but disturbing (has an ex CIA and marine talking about what they do to civilians *shudder*)
http://free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/usgenocide/CrbnCnSthAmrc.html

How could we forget Nicaragua, where the US was found guilty by the world court of practising international terrorism, and fined $17 billion. Every administration has refused to recognise the ruling, and at the time, the administration actually increased their attacks on the country.
http://www.ibon.org/news/if/02/17.htm

How about Laos ? (350,000 civilian deaths due to US bombing) - not the highest estimate

Cambodia ? (600,000 civilian deaths due to US bombing) - again, not the highest estimate.For example, Operation \"Speedy Express\" resulted in 10,899 \"enemy\" deaths ... curiously, the enemy were standing around, unarmed, in rice paddies. You figure it out.

Hmmm, I need to make another message, I\'m running out of space for all the other countries that the US has bombed:

http://www.human-net.org/war-issue/en/facts/usabomb.htm

never mind the ones that they went into and overthrew DEMOCRATICALLY elected governments using violence. The US prefers dictatorships because they are easier to control.

You also said:

Now I\'m sure some you know what a nuclear weapon is. If not I\'ll simplify it

Thanks. The US was nice enough to not waste their time dropping nuclear bombs on military targets. A waste of time indeed ! They just went straight for the civilian populations, so now we now. This had the postive effect of showing all the other countries that they were QUITE insane. Unfortunately, it also means that many foreigners now have a hard time taking the US seriously when they talk about \"human rights\" or nasty terrorists who \"deliberately\" target civilians during a war ...

And Iraq has only got a few missles that extend just past the allowed 150km range. Last time I checked, the US was further away than that. The only \"experts\" you\'ll find who believe Iraq has a real shot at nuclear arms are the same clowns who insist there is a link between Iraq (secular state) and Al-Qa\'ida (devout religious). They can\'t stand each other.

[Grey]

I remember sitting in a room with friends when Bush gave the state of the union.  They became pissed at me because I started to weed out the information that had no real backing and was inconsistant, which was pretty much all the part when he was itching about Saddam.  Though I don\'t know if all of your information has proper backing, I know that no one knows what they are talking about.  Including me.

[Fanomatic2000]

All lies! The heroes from the United States would never do such stuff! Especially not George Bush (sheriff of the world)
The americans are heroes, and if they killed a lot of people in other countries, so what? It\'s America for christ sake. They can do exactly as they want because they are the most powerful nation of the world.
Just think about all the poor americans who have died in the Vietnam war. They just tried to take Vietnam from the bad, bad vietnamese people. Don\'t worry about it, I\'m sure that the Vietnamese families who were slaughtered, raped etc. will forgive the Americans somewhere in a distant future.
Oh, and they can be proud over what the did to Salvadore Allende in the military coup in Chile. I mean, after all he actually had the guts to oppose the Americans, of course he must die.
It\'s ok, after all the Americans saved us from the nazis (but not until America were attacked as well)
Wow, I can\'t wait until the whole world becomes members of the United states. I\'m gonna buy myself a shotgun so I\'m prepared.
 

[Creathor]

\"I have made good judgements in the past, I have made good judgements in the future.\" - George W. Bush

\"You\'re working hard to put food on your family.\" - George W. Bush

\"I come from Texas.\" - George W. Bush

That\'s all I gotta say

[Raya]

Fanomatic2000 I think you forgot this:



 :]

[Pegasus]

Originally posted by Grey
We can\'t because we have laws about that kinda thing...

You have laws against killing people? Hmm dont you have this thing called \'death penalty\' ... what is that again?

The thing is the US would have the possibility to kill saddam anytime and at any place but it is far more economic to have him wandering around and threaten america so that the american people (you) live every day in fear and will buy lots of guns and work hard to pay more taxes in order to fund wars against \'bad\' people who could probably by a small chance kill americans.*

\'War makes money go round\'

*To round it up spread some sarcasm here and there

[Grey]

we have laws against political assassination...  Actually a few years ago 5 CIA men were put undercover to go and assassinate him, but (i guess) someone figured that it would be too obvious, so they were put on trial for conspiracy.