Author Topic: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread  (Read 26749 times)

Karyuu

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 9341
    • View Profile
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #105 on: April 14, 2007, 08:39:19 am »
And as a curiousity, why was the vote for Hokyba retracted? Does it have something that does not qualify it for participating or did the person who voted on it change of opinion?

The one who submitted the nomination, later sent a PM asking for the vote to be taken back. I know no more :)
Judge: Are you trying to show contempt for this court, Mr Smith?
Smith: No, My Lord. I am attempting to conceal it.

Nurahk

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #106 on: April 14, 2007, 08:41:28 am »
Both to be honest.  The explorers are one of those guilds that have spurts of activity every few months.  Added to which, if you want to see an explorer, best place to find them is in the dev channel ;)

Three years ago was their greatest time...just a little under three years...
I've been here too long :P

Narure

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #107 on: April 14, 2007, 11:54:38 am »
What if there are 17 guilds with several votes, then 5 more with a vote of one? Somehow 3 would have to be chosen from that latter group. I think there may be a time for the clear-cut systematic approach to pause - if there are no problems trusting the moderators to do a random choosing at that point (pull names from a hat, etc.) that may be the quickest way to move onto the poll.

Or another idea is to cap it at the 17 in that case? Just brainfarting  >o)

bilbous

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #108 on: April 14, 2007, 04:25:45 pm »
It is Playoff season, top 6 teams make the cut. If there is a tie for the final positions the tied guild leaders or their champions meet in the PVP room in a sudden death shoot-out - en mass or round robin.

Narure

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #109 on: April 14, 2007, 05:01:00 pm »
sounds amazing but i hear calls of ic for ooc on the horizon.

bilbous

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #110 on: April 14, 2007, 05:29:24 pm »
Well just create a sub-section of the RP board: Yliakum Gazette move the actual interviews there, keep OC questions and responses in [ ] but try to keep IC as much as possible. Problem solved!

Maybe once the in-game note making functionality is developed there could be an in-game edition.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2007, 05:31:43 pm by bilbous »

Allive

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #111 on: April 15, 2007, 07:59:48 am »
active and promonent i have seen perhaps one person from explorers in pat 4 months i wouldnt say that either verry active or promnent.
I am afraid of fighting. I am afriad of being beaten and losing. But i am more afraid of surviving as a cripple than dying in fight.However. I always try to find a new strong enamy.
(Fighter in the wind)

Karyuu

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 9341
    • View Profile
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #112 on: April 15, 2007, 08:02:46 am »
You have seen one, but perhaps you are simply not looking :) The Explorers are an active guild, and I have seen Mordaan in the game just a few minutes ago.
Judge: Are you trying to show contempt for this court, Mr Smith?
Smith: No, My Lord. I am attempting to conceal it.

Narure

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #113 on: April 15, 2007, 01:44:03 pm »
They tend to boogy in the mountains. Being explorers and all.

Eagel

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
    • Eagel's site
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #114 on: April 16, 2007, 12:19:17 am »
I'm a proud member of The Explorers... well... a recent member, but very proud  \\o//
If you can't see us around Harnquist it doesn't mean that we aren't in-game.
Take a tour at our site!!

Karyuu

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 9341
    • View Profile
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #115 on: April 19, 2007, 09:09:48 pm »
Everyone got lazy with PMs. I've no choice but to put this on hold until I figure out a way to make people participate.

More likely than not, since the guild forum community isn't interested in choosing, the moderators will make spotlight choices on their own.
Judge: Are you trying to show contempt for this court, Mr Smith?
Smith: No, My Lord. I am attempting to conceal it.

Narure

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #116 on: April 19, 2007, 09:19:43 pm »
A third round started?! I was waiting to see the latest spotlight before voting again.

LARAGORN

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1252
  • Facts dont cease to exist because they are ignored
    • View Profile
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #117 on: April 20, 2007, 05:30:30 am »
It seems Karyuu that a new form of advertising is needed. Just like Narure, I didnt know the new voting stage had begun.

You did have a much better responce with the polling votes, maybe it would be best if you did select the guilds to vote on. Selecting 5 guilds per voting period would make the whole thing much more player friendly, then everyone could vote without trying to think of a new guild to nominate. A link to each guilds promo thread or website would give us all an easy way to learn of each new candidate.

???

All great truthes begin as blasphemies- SHAW
Adraax KCP Adraax Forum

Raleigh

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #118 on: April 20, 2007, 06:28:53 pm »
Not selection then, I would say, put all the names of the guilds that can be nominated inside hollow balls, put them on a bingo machine and start turning it. Also you could make bets with people about which guilds would go on the game, and play a bingo after it.  :thumbup:

Or just make another way of random selection, of course a d100 isn't a very practical idea.

Or much easier, I'll send my nomination hoping it's not too late and you go send yours too.

bilbous

  • Guest
Re: Guild Spotlight: Discussion Thread
« Reply #119 on: April 20, 2007, 07:03:25 pm »
How about considering past nominations as being up for consideration for subsequent rounds? For the first week a poll for which two nominations should compete in the second weeks poll.