I'd say Amen to that.
What I wonder concerning the topic though is: Okay, enkis intermarry now and then (ingame: probably most players dont care), hence they arent rascist (or thus). Now, if no one else cares, or must care, that attribute is without sense and can be dropped anyway. If one does care, like he reacts with despise on an interracially mixed enki couple, that would be rascism, no? You could flip pennies now and say, that despise wouldnt necessarily have to be based on feelings of superiority but for instance on some odd fear of having his own race to be vanished.
However, the latter one probably would be considered a rascist - but whats worth the play and the whole feature, if one must not react on it consequently and in all facets?
Add to Raas:
Scientifical approach is a bit vague I daresay, as in nature interracial couples are more of the .. rare case, no? And if a pack-member leaves that 'tribe', the traditions and the whole lifestyle, quitting to transport it to offsprings, wouldnt one consider that a threat to the entire pack, having the pack surrendering in the end that is?