Author Topic: Dungeon Instances  (Read 2830 times)

Abemore

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 508
    • View Profile
Dungeon Instances
« on: July 28, 2003, 12:05:49 am »
Is the PS team considering Instanced Dungeons?
This is when a player or a party enters a dungeon that becomes an instance (or a copy) that they will have all to themselves.  The next party that enters the same dungeon will create a new instance, thus the dungeon will always be \"ready\" for adventurers, the 2 parties will never meet, and there will be no need for monster spawning.

This idea is being used by World of Warcraft which is beginning to looking like a pretty amazing game.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2003, 12:17:54 am by Abemore »

Awaiting Invite from the Ordo Illuminatis.

Before you criticize someone, remember to walk a mile in their shoes...
...then when you criticize them, you\'ll be a mile away ...and you\'ll have their shoes.

Moogie

  • Forum Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4551
  • Artist/Flash Animator
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2003, 01:19:50 am »
Sounds like a great idea, but I\'m not sure of the consequences it could have on the server. Will these Instances be managed client-side as if the party is playing their own private LAN game or will the server have to handle every Instance with it\'s own power?

If the former, I\'m all for it! :)

Wedge

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 619
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2003, 05:40:14 am »
Yeah I saw that when I was reading about WoW too and it sounds really interesting.  That way you could do much better dungeons that had bosses and traps that would always be there for everyone and it would play in a much more logical way.  There could be a central hub area at the begining of every dungeon where people can look for parties and such, and then when they go of into a branch of the dungeon they get serperated from the rest of the world, be a great way to force people to work in teams (which is something you should have to do) and prevent all killstealing and such mo\' fo\'.  Good question though is how the heck they will actually do that, I think it was still in concept for WoW, but it\'s  an excellent idea.

Yeah it could even be written into the game, say that whenever you enter the darker regions of the realm you shift into a world where there are no people and only monsters roam.  That\'s really more play off of the title than the actual mythos, but it still could work.
Ninjas have feelings too.  Mostly they feel like dancing.



Abemore

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 508
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2003, 07:04:48 am »
Quote
you shift into a world where...
are you saying you \"shift\" \"planes\"? *wink**wink*
Sure it can be done.  There is nothing stopping it.  It would just have to be programmed.

Quote
Sounds like a great idea, but I\'m not sure of the consequences it could have on the server. Will these Instances be managed client-side as if the party is playing their own private LAN game or will the server have to handle every Instance with it\'s own power?

If the former, I\'m all for it!
It would definitely be the latter.  I don\'t see how it could be possible to manage the instances client-side.  I must not have explained it thoroughly.  It may help if you read the 2nd and 3rd questions on http://www.blizzard.com/wow/faq/faq_gameplay.shtml .
WoW also allows one party to \"link\" to another party so they can join them in the same instance of a dungeon.  This means you wont run into people you don\'t know in a dungeon.

Edit: because we are using client-server architecture, practically everything must be managed on the server.  The clients are only good for sending the \"I wanna do something request\" and graphically displaying the world to the user.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2003, 07:13:23 am by Abemore »

Awaiting Invite from the Ordo Illuminatis.

Before you criticize someone, remember to walk a mile in their shoes...
...then when you criticize them, you\'ll be a mile away ...and you\'ll have their shoes.

Vengeance

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1452
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2003, 05:47:29 pm »
Paxx has long been an advocate of instanced dungeons.  I, otoh, dislike them intensely, so we don\'t really know if we will have them or not.  Certainly the next couple iterations will not because it is a difficult feature to implement.

- Venge

zaphar

  • Hydlaa Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 259
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2003, 08:58:55 pm »
the problem with having instanced dungeons in a game like this is: \"where does the dungeon begin and the rest of the game end?\"

Monsters may be found almost anywhere in the game with the exception of the cities. Are you going to make everything but the cities instanced? That would destroy the community of the game. If not then how do you decide what areas are dungeons and what areas are not. What if an area that would fit the description of dungeon for \"Good\" aligned players actually fits the description of home sweet home for \"evil\" aligned players?

No I tend to think for a game like this one dungeons should be kept in the community.  If overcrowding is a worry then you can always set maximum occupancy but instancing I think would begin to turn the game into more of an FPS or Diablo type of idea. You log on find a group and then go off and play by yourselves. Doesn\'t really appeal to me sorry.
*Zaphar grins roguishly as he exits the post


Ellarion

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 40
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2003, 10:32:30 pm »
I think instances is a good thing for a some \"special\" dungeons. For example, there could be a dungeon concerned with a big quest. This quest includes a journey to this very special place with monsters, traps, other complexities like labyrinths. In this case, \"odd\"  players would be a hindrance. Imagine - you received a promising quest, looking forward to have a great time solving all puzzles... but that dungeon is full of other players that are trampling down bloody dead monster\'s remains, pulled down all traps, breaked through the labyrinth so there\'s a direct shortcut now. :D
Sound/Music Department

Wedge

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 619
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2003, 10:35:51 pm »
Naaa just areas that had level design would be instanced.  The oppurtunity for making much more in depth level design skyrockets with this idea.  That way you can put puzzles and traps and bosses all in the dungeon, things that are impossible or awkward in a large public style system.  Especially puzzles, like figuring out a way to cross a chasm and there is a draw bridge on the otherside.  Maybe you have a physcic that could flip the switch, or an archer that could hit it, or maybe if you are higher level charcter something like this could be solved just by using a powerful levitation spells or something.  It would also be a great method for implementing my ideas about having treasure hunting and exploration in the game.
Ninjas have feelings too.  Mostly they feel like dancing.



Vengeance

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1452
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2003, 04:11:14 am »
Personally, I am 100% with Zaphar on this one.

Ayshe

  • Hydlaa Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2003, 05:16:38 am »
I think it would be fun to be in a dungeon, running for your life, pursued by monsters and then suddenly faced with another party. You could pay them to help you, or if they were allies they might do it anyway. Or if they were enemies, sucks to be you!.

They could have items you need, or might even lend you a member or two to reach the surface. You cound warn them of dangers, or ask for tips etc.

I thought the idea of a MMPORG was to interact with other players in all facets, rather than interact in the town then fly solo through the dungeons. If the maps are large enough this should not be a problem. Ever play ATITD? to walk across evey cell of the map might take a realtime week. You would usually only have, say 3 parties within 20 mins walking anyway. The openness, and loneliness of the game makes interaction more fun, rather than the opposite.

Of course I realise that an open terrain map is slightly different from twisting tunnels and plot-key items scattered but I am sure it\'s possible.

My actual point is this: The people making the game have plenty of ideas I\'m sure, and I am willing to bet they aren\'t going to tell us them all, but rather surprise us. What they end up with will be uniquely Planeshift, and I am totally confident that it will totally beat any other game of similar genre hands down. Why? because the people making the game play the game. They aren\'t in it for the money :D. They\'re in it for the game.
The Felines Lair

Abemore

  • Hydlaa Notable
  • *
  • Posts: 508
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2003, 07:05:32 am »
If you\'re in a dungeon, whether running for your life or not, you and the other party will probably ignore each other.

Well with an Instance Advocate and an Instance Critic on the team, the best I can hope for is a nearly instance free world with only certain small areas that are instanced.  Perhaps separated by sets of doors like at bird aviaries.  Unsolved puzzles could perhaps be found here.

And if not, thats fine too.  I was just curious of the developers position on this.  Thanks for the reply Venge.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2003, 07:07:23 am by Abemore »

Awaiting Invite from the Ordo Illuminatis.

Before you criticize someone, remember to walk a mile in their shoes...
...then when you criticize them, you\'ll be a mile away ...and you\'ll have their shoes.

Ravencrowe

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 23
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2003, 01:51:44 am »
Quote
Originally posted by zaphar
the problem with having instanced dungeons in a game like this is: \"where does the dungeon begin and the rest of the game end?\"

Monsters may be found almost anywhere in the game with the exception of the cities. Are you going to make everything but the cities instanced? That would destroy the community of the game. If not then how do you decide what areas are dungeons and what areas are not. What if an area that would fit the description of dungeon for \"Good\" aligned players actually fits the description of home sweet home for \"evil\" aligned players?

No I tend to think for a game like this one dungeons should be kept in the community.  If overcrowding is a worry then you can always set maximum occupancy but instancing I think would begin to turn the game into more of an FPS or Diablo type of idea. You log on find a group and then go off and play by yourselves. Doesn\'t really appeal to me sorry.



URGH!!  The idea seemed like aces to me the way I thought of it, and the way I thought of it you missed the point entirely!

Outdoor areas and dungeons are very different. In an outdoor area (where there are monsters but they\'re spread about and instancing is not necessary at all), let\'s say you form the party. Then you go to the dungeon (thickly populated by monsters, where instancing is not necessary, but in this case is implemented). Your party is on their own. This would work if the rest of the game helped it work that way. For example, if you die in the dungeon and don\'t have a rezzer, maybe you get shot out of the dungeon and have to find your party again, but at no other penalty? The way I see it, if the dungeon is an instance for individuals and individual parties, that just opens up more possibilities for the dungeon\'s design.

When is a dungeon a community? When is a dungeon even a part of a community? When you\'re already in a party, you\'re enjoying the community of it. When you\'re soloing, and see another party, it only adds a community aspect if you want to join them. What are you doing soloing in a dungeon? You\'re either looking for a group there, or you want to fight alone with no one bothering you. The dungeon is instanced; here are YOUR monsters. Enjoy fighting them. Having the dungeon as your own or your party\'s own does not destroy the game\'s community aspect. It might limit it a little bit, but quite frankly I think MMORPGs nowadays sacrifice gameplay to focus too much on community. Besides, that \"destroying the community\" that you mention could be helped by adding good \"looking for group\" systems that cater toward dungeon exploring parties.

\"Good\" alligned players and \"Evil\" alligned players both deserve good gameplay. Plenty of world areas would be nice \"hang out spots\" for both of these people. When they get together, they might eventually decide they want to go to a dungeon. This is where it would get good if such an idea is implemented.

Implemented properly, this could prove to be a good idea.  A BAD idea, however, is a maximum occupancy. Is there ever a maximum occupancy for dungeons in these types of games? This would make groups very disappointed when they get to a dungeon and can\'t even go into it. Think of the possibilities of an idea before you shoot it down, please.

Vengeance

  • Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 1452
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2003, 08:59:57 am »
Abe, I do understand the suckyness of having a dungeon cleared out right before your group enters it, and I hope we find ways of avoiding that.  I just don\'t think instancing is the answer.

As far as unsolved puzzles go, I am under no illusion that any puzzle in the game will remain a secret for long, unfortunately.

- Venge

Ravencrowe

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 23
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2003, 10:26:15 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Vengeance
As far as unsolved puzzles go, I am under no illusion that any puzzle in the game will remain a secret for long, unfortunately.

- Venge


Yeah, that\'s a shame really.  But, it would still be fun to solve a puzzle, even if it\'s already known how to solve it.


As for \"the answer\" I completely understand.  I\'ve never seen this \"dungeon instancing\" idea in action, but it could be good or bad.  You have to find a way to make the dungeons special that won\'t interfere with the overall game.  Besides not being able to share the dungeon with other people/groups, what about dungeon instancing do you not like?
« Last Edit: July 30, 2003, 10:27:04 am by Ravencrowe »

Kenny

  • Traveller
  • *
  • Posts: 49
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2003, 11:47:18 am »
I am totely against the idea.

You saw some explenations why not, that my oppinium too.

It\'d ruin the game!