Originally posted by Sudomir
Getting a little fascist here, aren\'t we?
Am I? I must have missed that. Sorry if I let my real self out (Hail Hitler!).
Seriously though, do you actually think that I\'m going to back down just because you accuse me of being fascist? Or that it helps convince me? Or that I\'d try to make sure that nobody thinks I\'m a fascist, or a nazi, or a communist? Well, neither is the case. If you are inclined to think I am, then please do so all you want, just know that it doesn\'t help your argumentation to use such emotion-laden keywords.
Originally posted by Sudomir
FYI about twice as many people speak Chinese as those that speak English(yes, I do have the Oxford World Atlas in front me, I was kind of curious
.
Well, so I had that fact wrong if your information is true. This doesn\'t, however, change the fact that english has been decided upon as the world language. Surely noone has been asking the russians by that time (I wouldn\'t know, actually, but I doubt it), but it\'s also true that english is the most important language in the world and that\'s because you\'ll be able to communicate with the highest percentage of ppl. in the world. I\'m not talking about native speakers exclusivley, but also about those who have english as a second language, or can at least communicate basic things as I believe applies to way more than 50% of the worlds population (or does your world atlas count that? I\'d really like to know which language is the most widely understood one it it\'s not english.).
Originally posted by Sudomir
And then we have Spanish, various Slavic ones, all of which aren\'t so far behind. Riiiight, let\'s ignore the other 30-40% because we\'re the 60-70% majority. Now, where have I heard that before?
I don\'t know, actually, for I am not you. Maybe in any democracy? FYI, this concept, called \"tyranny by majority\", is commonly used in the computing world (or do you get every game and application for Mac OS? Or Linux? I don\'t think so), for simple economic reasons. I strongly believe that there is a great need for a common language for the world, and if this is english (as has been decided), that\'s fine with me (remember, I\'m not a native english speaker. I chose to learn english because it\'s the most important language in the world, no other reason. I could have learned other languages just as well, but with english I get most conversation for my learning effort, flat and simple.). Of course, I wouldn\'t be happy if it were changed to, say, greek, but choosing a language that is spoken by the majority (or the most influencial nations) certainly will be better than some artificial language or another one, because the general acceptance will be better, as can be seen from RL examples.
Originally posted by Sudomir
As far as PS itself, since it went this way: I don\'t think it would have been so hard to add gettext support or something like that to it, but I suspect it wasn\'t even discussed much. Making separate \"patches\" for each language is broken by its nature.
Probably it wouldn\'t have been, but as long as there is no significant player base that doesn\'t speak english I\'d rather see the effort go into the game itself. If you start catering to anything and everything, regardless of it\'s actual impact, you don\'t get anything done anymore.
Originally posted by Sudomir
Perhaps they were also trying to get an answer in their own language? And they have no idea where to post it otherwise? If you so dislike foreign languages, why\'d you not at least make sure everybody(including newcomers) has a chance to find that out before posting(ie make it one of the rules and post it on the website)?
Well, we should indeed put this somewhere to be easily found. I also agree that reading technical details in a foreign language can be very hard if you don\'t have basic knowledge of this same technical stuff, but in that case you wouldn\'t be able to use the information anyway.
Originally posted by Sudomir
Seriously, just go and try to learn a foreign language, prefferably one that has a radically different writing system, then talk(no offence intended, but it doesn\'t look like you\'ve done so)... Btw, I thought this is a community forum? Why do you want to answer every question yourself?
OK, then find another person on this forum who speaks russian... I believe they would have posted something in this thread if they did exist...
And nobody is saying that you should learn english for PS. But I wonder how you can even find PS if you don\'t speak english, or how you can think of playing an
online game without basic knowledge of english, let alone an RPG, which is a great deal about talking..., unless there\'s a local server for your language (as isn\'t the case in PS).
And still, the posts must be intellegible by the mods because they are, well, mods. If they\'d not be able to read the posts, they couldn\'t police the forum and flamewars or SPAM would just have to be posted in some non-english language.
Originally posted by Sudomir
P.S. This attitude is absolutely horrible, and if it actually is shared by developers, I don\'t see it getting PS anything other than a fork. I\'m not sure about win32 developers, but most of the other opensource projects I\'m aware of take as many steps as possible to being portable and having i18n/l10n capability from the beginning - if there\'s, say, one person having trouble compiling on FreeBSD, he/she doesn\'t usually get \"Get lost, all of us are using Linux/win32 to run it\"... acknowledge your bugs, at least, maybe someone will be around to fix them...
I don\'t think that internationalisation is the same as portability. Furthermore, there is a greater chance of FreeBSD being used than gaelic. Furthermore, I don\'t think anybody is going to try to be compatible with, say, Unununium... or DOS.
So even if none of the devs feels like adding gettext support, they\'ll most likely not refuse your patches.
I don\'t think that a fork would get very far, though, for the lack of developers. Also the content would not be able to be used in the fork unless you\'d get permission, which I doubt. Not to keep you from forking in general (they could have used something other than the GPL to achieve this), but to keep PS unique (as stated in the PS license).
Also, most of the time, ppl. who want to run it on an unsupported OS usually create the appropriate patches themselves (or at least do a great deal of work on them), which I don\'t see happening in the language case (but I don\'t read the CVS so I might just have missed it).
However, do you
honestly want the conversation in PS to be a mixture of 10 different languages, talking simultaneously? It might be an option to have national servers, but how likely is that, anyway?