Originally posted by Syilph
/me doesn\'t get it neither...
Is that \" (and SCoY)\" in the title a subtle attack on Easton?
Besides i don\'t see what SCoY has to do with what you posted there...

Me sorry.
After it was written, I realized I should have just left it as \"Bush for president of SCoY.\"
You see, the Bush admin style and polcies is what makes me suspect of SCoY--so...when I saw this I thought of Easton Ghent, and flashed him being as whacked as Bush.
This was my last fun poke at SCoY and Easton--I\'m sure he is not as crazy as President Bush?.

[I hit a button and something may be wrong with the rest of this post]
See this link while you still can--see the actions link on that page & recent news:
http://www.legitgov.org/peaceprotests.html

Originally posted by zanzibar
Bah, Cuba has a nationalist government and a nationalist agenda.  They do what they do because it\'s in the interest of their own people.... they are not the concern here.

People don\'t believe the US government would commit acts of terrrorism against it\'s own people--the Cuban Crisis is the first substantiated and documented case, I know of, to be legally revealed to the American Public.  You\'ll find at least one man who has partaked, planned, or in some cases, even implemented every illegal government act against the American people since the \'50s--his name is Dick Cheney.

In response to the Cuban Crisis in the \'60s the pentagon came up with a plan to conduct small scale attacks against targets in D.C., Florida, Guantanamo, and an American ship which would be parked outside Cuba\'s port.  On March, 13, 1962, the plan was approved by the Pentagon and authorized by President Kennedy.

The problem was that they could not find enough \"friendly Cubans\" to train for the attacks, and so they used US military personell--posed as Cubans.

When the time came to retaliate against Cuba for the attacks--Kennedy balked, opting for the already initiated plans B and C to just assassinate Castro.  A femme fatale working  for the US had successfully become his girlfriend--but she fell in love with him and refused to kill him, saying, \"He is the best gentleman I have ever met, a wonderful man.\"  Plan C of a sniper was foiled by the Cuban military.

The femme fatale was reported murdered in Phoenix, AZ in 1990.

*For current President Bush\'s part see this thread:

http://www.planeshift3d.com/wbboard/thread.php?threadid=22846&boardid=19&styleid=3&page=1#1

Originally posted by madmax_2069
sweet im glad to still see it will be supported. i can understand it takes a wile to do this for 10.2 cause its like a totaly diffrent OS from 10.3 and 10.4 but are all the same. weird in a way. but keep up the great work and i do hope this game will eventualy play with minimal bug\'s its going to take time i can understand. i did enjoy the game when i was able to play it and really look forward to being able to play it again. good job all

Actually it is Apple\'s fault.  10.3 shipped with gcc 4 and it was doing fine until 10.3.9 when they added a direct file to dual access libraries--supposedly to help uni code programs, but there were no strictly unicode programs or even an operating system for them yet.  They did this secretly, without informing Mac developers.  Mac developers learned that they had to use gcc 3.3 in order to be compatible with 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, and universal.  Which is done by resetting to use gcc3.3 instead of gcc4. [Note: this file only helps \"mac universal code\" programs a little bit.]

Now, one of Planeshift mac compiler persons didn\'t know this, and I understand a final check was done of the Mac Client using 10.3.9--without resetting to use gcc3.3--so the final compilation inserted a direct file that caused PS Mac client to not be compatible with 10.2.

**For everyone\'s sake I repeat what I said before:  gcc 3.3 compiles for 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, and universal; gcc4 with the direct added to 10.3.9 barely optimizes a program for universal; all mac universal systems will come with a program which automatically optimizes \"strict\" universal bit code programs, and makes not Uni code programs usable.  True universal bit code OS and hardware systems are only just now beginning to be released, and they are not 100% uni mac code.
Therefore, it is not necesary to compile for universal code until mac no longer supports not uni mac code--and notice that gcc3.3 is uni mac code compliant.  [All those who have closed off 10.2, have done so prematurely.]

Moreover, Mac will not be squeezing out their not uni mac code systems or programs for years to come (only 10.2) and uni mac code may not be so universal--just like when they came out with the power macs that were supposed to be cross-platform by using universal code--why it is called Mac universal code.

Originally posted by derwoodly
Gripen, providing proof is not done by quoting yourself.

You implied that 500,000 people marched in LA in protest of the war.  I think you are way wrong on that number.  AS PROOF here is a LINK to a reconiziable web site.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060319/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_war_protests

@ Kixie, wow! looks like your the sane one in this thread! who would have thought! )

Ahh, another unbelieving lying infidel.  You suffer from a severe reading deficit, don\'t you?
I never said or implied that it was war protests, and I have not quoted myself--not even once.
What I did say, is that even protests are not covered by national news coverage until it is okayed that it will not cause a risk to national security.  I used the protests which I mentioned as evidence of that fact--so either you are very underinformed, or my information is correct regarding the tampering with news coverage--and you should be hearing about the protests in the next couple or weeks or even months.  
[What part of the country are you in?]

Kixie isn\'t any more sane than the rest of us, just a little better socially programmed, or unwilling to view the evidence (like you).  Both of you should view the video from the first post.

Originally posted by Suno_Regin
Alright, I only read page one, but...KIERN, ZANZIBAR, stop spamming the thread with your arguements. >_>

Really, I\'ve put up with enough today, and I don\'t need this...

To everyone else:

Thanks, and I hope to see you all ingame again when I get the chance to log back on.

Ain\'t that the ultimate welcome back slap in the face?
Arguing spammers on the board--who are regulars--and being unable to log in.
Surely to be expected.
After all, this is the same PS you left.

[I\'m learning]

Originally posted by Kixie

Quote

Originally posted by steuben

Quote

Originally posted by Gripen
True highrise buildings are designed with built in self destruct explosives AS REQUIRED BY CODE in case the building ever collapses--it will implode to it\'s foundations rather than destroy all the surrounding communities (for 3 to 10 miles with blowout) very devastating with the dominoe effect of more buildings falling.

care to back that one up?

What he meant was \"All true high rise building are required to have frame supports that are compatible with common explosives at joint frameworks so that when the building is ready to be taken down it can be done with relative ease.\" This is for demolition, not conpiracy.

I\'d love to see some real evidence for some of the extravagant claims made in this thread. Some of them make me truly chuckle, that is untill I realise how serious you are. Serious people truly scare me, expecially with such a radical viewpoint. Remember, radicalism on any side of the fence leads to destruction. So be sure you\'re making the right decision before you start acting or even killing for a cause like some of the anti-american sentiments you may read here.  :rolleyes:

I guess believing Cheney would attempt to murder his lawyer in front of the secret service, and the secret service backing him up as innocent is a great deal more believable than architects designing in a safety measure to cause a true high-rise to collapse when structural failure occured--rather than fall over because they never collapse evenly unless they are demolished properly.

The freaky part in the video regarding the system, is that the gold was evacuated out the evacuation tunnels before it happened--and that the 7 story building was also demolished (perhaps all the buildings of the WTC were on the same circuit).
Oh, and the bit about the flights (7 & 11) were never scheduled to fly that day, and the planes with the FCC number for those two flights are still in use--even though all records show the planes for 7 & 11 were demolished.  EERIE.  (But totally believable, given the extent of the Bush family involvement.)

I do have a problem with the video though--wasn\'t it the new 767s that were used?  The video talks about 707 757, but I thought they were 767s.  Their size is more to the 767.

***[How many people am I reaching here? 5? I really need a better network    (but then they\'d kill me).]

The president will never be the scapegoat for black ops as long as he cooperates--and they always do.

True highrise buildings are designed with built in self destruct explosives AS REQUIRED BY CODE in case the building ever collapses--it will implode to it\'s foundations rather than destroy all the surrounding communities (for 3 to 10 miles with blowout) very devastating with the dominoe effect of more buildings falling.  The unplanned part of the implosion is that the system was damaged enough by the explosion on one floor, that it did not detect that the floors above the impact were splayed, and therefore did not activate until a lower floor collapsed from structural meltdown in the heat.



The reason the U.S. and not only the U.S. but also all the western european countries, all the global corporations (China included) would desire Afghanistan and Iraq out of the way is because of the Caspian sea oil pipeline to the Persian Gulf--these two countries opposed it.  The future of all of the afforementioed organizations and then some are dependent on the approval and success of this pipeline (unless some very powerful people would approve of polluting the Mediteranean with oil tankers as acceptable = the alternative).  

Russia wanted to take over Afghanistan because it was one of the major regions for sourcing money for government black ops in the western world through drug traficking (which the U.S. was number one--largest drug cartel in the world).

Osama bin Laden was hired long ago as an operative by the us government to prevent USSR from overtaking the drug market from the us black ops.  All of his \"militia\" were trained and funded by US money up untill the Taliban gained power and shut down all the drug trade in Afghanistan.

The strangest part is that in the 6 months before 9/11 is the enormous amount of money that was channeled from us government accounts to the Al Qaida.  Moreover, when this came out on the news, the investigations findings were hushed up accross the board--even if it was an enemy government that paid them (called a risk to national security).

Stranger yet, is how national security has become an excuse to prevent nationwide news coverage.  Such as peace protests--such coverage is now considered to be a risk to national security (I guess they don\'t want it to become popular).  Also, these new sections of national security law--all reenacted and moreso after 9/11--are used to prevent immediate coverage of many public events and protests (like against WTO, or even anti-Bush).  All news coverage is limited to local only--until it is found to not \"disturb the national security\"--such as with public shock, outrage, or even uprising (yeah, like that is really going to happen in an apathetic country like the US is now).  Especially peace protests are now limited to local news then slowly spread accross the nation.

***By the way, did anyone in non-local area hear about the 20,000 people march in Pheonix Arizona this past weekend?***



WHY WOULD THE US GOVERNMENT, THE UN, BRITAIN, HUGE GLOBAL CORPORATIONS, ET AL WANT 9/11 TO HAPPEN?  (It is not a whole government or politically public action that they have taken, but people in it conducting a push for power.)

First, they never expected so many to be killed in the event--and they never thought rescuers would enter the building.

2--for a mere 3/4 of a billion they hired a scape goat to take the blame and become a world leader and hero of his people.

3--Now they can claim a legitimate way to open the Caspian sea pipline

4--The corporations involved have made over 100 billion dollars since the event through exercises taken in the name of it.

5--The united fascist movement in the United States has regained all of it\'s original authority and then some, making leaps and bounds in the control of American government, people, and the world.

6--Now, every government installled will be a united fascist republic, complete with backing from ________.  (Welcome to \"the post war world\")

7--The black ops divisions of the US now have full authority to overthrow and replace all operations which were established during the cold war.  These include fascist governments, drug cartels, and even some global corporations who believed they had become big enough to not support the weakening US fascisti regime--which is now the most powerful one in the world, and secret.


The question is--is this really all bad?  After all, EVERYTHING the developed world has was acquired through war and oppression (and they still oppress any and all of their own people who oppose them--even killing them if they happen upon enough power to influence a nit).  If they had not done these things in the past all the people would have suffered and died quite horribly--that is why they did it--is this why they do it now?

Horrors: the intelligence that knew of the plan, the target, and the perpetrators and knew they were boarding planes in the country.  The huge money that was paid from US, British, and other western government accounts to Al Qaida and the Taliban in the 6 to 9 months prior to 9/11--and the closing of the investigational findings which first started discovering these payments (even the one of the FBI hiring Palestinians to attack the US for $25000--isnt the fbi an internal law enforcement and intelligence agency?  I never knew the F could stand for \"foreign\"?  But nobody really cares--after all, we have to make a living, support our families, etc..)

Note to government:  Well, I may have said too much already, but since I haven\'t given sources and I haven\'t revealed anything I didn\'t already see on the news somewhere--THERE IS NO REASON TO INVESTIGATE ME, so leave me alone, and don\'t waste your time.  I haven\'t encouraged any riots, burning the bushes, or lynching Cheney for his part in it and the attempted murder of his attorney.  [There\'s a joke for you--a man who was raised with guns all around his crib, was taught safe handling of them all his life--accidently shoots his lawyer in the heart.  Ask any NRA member about the chances of that happening.