Then there's the other configuring of things like the panels, (I have one on top, one of bottom, and another one which pop out from the side,); I also have four virtual desktops, and I miss them dearly in Windows
Windows XP Powertools, which is an addon pack (free) released by Microsoft, features virtual desktops (up to 4). Not sure about panels.
Linux panels are far more customizable. Windows panel also suffers wierd bugs when you move it to different screen locations (such as making it a top bar) uinless you restart your computer. Otherwise certain 3d rendered things interpret your mouseclick in the wrong location (off by about the height of your startmenu). I tend to use between 6 and 8 desktops at once. I have one for web browsing, one for blender, one for gimp, etc. Why not have some of them running in the same desktop? Partially because it keeps the taskbar uncluttered, also some of the caching makes it faster to use the virtual desktops as the contents of the others are eventually cached to disk for retrieval instead of all staying in ram like is the case with windows. The two are not comparable.
and finally the numerous other little tweakable things which are as I want them. For applications: Amarok (a music player)
Plenty of music players avaliable for windows.
True but I've never found a single media player on windows that rivals amarok. I have winamp pro 5, Windows Media Player, RealPlayer (god forbid), and many others, but no dice. Songbird is a cross platform media player that is looking promising however.
KNotes (post-its)
The new windows vista has a post-it notes gadget avaliable for the sidebar that does this.
I've been using post-its in linux since 2002, and I'm sure they were available long before that. I'm actually surprised windows is just getting them now.
x64 GIMP
I think you can edit images in windows.
There are some advantages of a native 64bit version of an image manipulation suite. Also proprietary equivalents on windows are prohibitively expensive. There are freeware apps but none come close to krita, gimp or photoshop.
K3B (CD&DVD burning)
Plenty of software to do this.. windows vista has CD&DVD burning native.
Name one completely free stable full featured suite of burning tools for windows. The native support is there in linux as well, but ;a good suite is hard to beat. Same goes for windows. Native is nice but a good tool that will do DVD titles, etc is invaluable. Can't compare windows native burning to K3B.
Konqueror (Filemanager/Browser)
IE7&windows explorer is finally reasonable in this area... I wouldnt have said that previously with IE6.
True the newer one is much better. But you have to realize you wouldn't have had it if it hadn't been for free software like firefox. It would have remained the same clunky ie6 like interface if they hadn't started to lose marketshare.
vobcopy (I rip DVD's to the HDD to watch later)
Can do as well with programs on windows.
Not natively. Linux lets me right click on the dvd icon on the desktop and just hit copy. I select dvdiso and bam. Its there for things like VLC media player to play. Windows does have dvddecrypter and dvdshrink which are nice as well. There isn't much difference in windows and linux in this department except that its easier in linux due to the native support.
Oh, and SSH.
I use PuttyTel for telenet and what not (as bilbous mentioned).
Putty is an open source client with its codebase originating in Linux. Once again you wouldn't have such an excellent free program without opensource software.
The command line is natively supported, and I can make calls to GUI apps from it for automation, or proper batch processing.
See windows powershell- pretty sure its going to be integrated now if you want it to be. Not positive, i've only played around with it a bit.
using proper shell scripting I can actually create real programs not just shell scripts. Also I could create a good enough script that could run on OSX, BSD, Solaris, Linux, and other *nix OS's. A windows powershell doesn't have that ability and it still can't make calls to gui apps because most gui apps in windows aren't designed with support for that. Linux programs tend to implement all core functionality and add a gui frontend instead of making the GUI unavoidable. This means that headless operation of a windows box is very difficult and essentially useless. Requiring a person to use the physical machine in cases like servers is not good for security.
I do not want to learn another command line, especially when the developers have pretty much isolated it.
Its being un-isolated now, and well 90% of windows users dont want to learn another O/S, but thats not a technical comment Smiley
The Shell linux uses is a long standing standard. Evenso, I think many windows users would be happy to jump ship if they knew all their apps would still run. They can't live without some of their apps - that link is what binds people to windows more I think, not necessarily its awesomeness.
...and personally I LOVE the KDE developer's philosophy of UI design.
Look and feel... you can skin windows however you want, really, its personal if you like KDE's UI.
Not comparable again. To use new themes in windows I had to get a patch to uxtheme.dll or install the horrific windowblinds software. Windows doesn't ALLOW you to skin it natively. You have to use an unofficial patch. Still though once you do, linux theming options outweigh windows by a lot. Windows can be nicely themed, but its about as flexible as a steel bar in comparison to most linux desktop environments. I personally prefer Gnome to KDE because its so mindbogglingly simple yet pretty. KDE is more windows like except more intuitive imho.
I just wrote a half hour response, before accidently clicking the stupid, useless, 'back' button on my mouse which told my browser to go back and delete what I wrote... Cursing I'm taking that as divine intervention to leave this thread alone.
Man I hate it when that happens. Totally unnerves me!