I have to disagree with Nurahk as to whether that (now far away) post of yours was actually useless.
Socius Rockus:
While the naming correlation might (and most likely should) question our originality as far as this field goes, I don't think this stands as a serious drawback on our part. In fact, I believe it makes the guild name all the more functional.
The former links you provided obviously don't hold much importance, seeing as names of those products are based on historical organisations to start with. The latter however is something I'd like to focus on a bit more. If we are to supply the wikipedia links,
this, along with the French organisation you pointed out, should be given the most interest. Function of our Imperial Guard is very similar to that of those past organisations and I believe for this reason, lack of naming originality is by all means justified. The name was used many times throughout the course of human history and I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be used again. It's not as much a name tightly connected with a single force, but rather a title that stood as a functional description. Similar case can be found in the actual historical guilds. We can assume there were many gatherings holding a name of the "Carpenters Guild" and should a guild by that name appear in Yliakum, its lack of naming originality will be overcasted by the fact it's more of a functional title to start with.
Furthermore, the Imperial Guard name provides a quick explanation as to what's the function of the guild itself, which in my opinion should stand as the utmost priority in the "professional" guild naming. The function will be all the more obvious for those, who have some basic historical knowledge about those organisations, and I think that's always a nice plus.
I also like the correlation with the Japanese organisation, which works quite nicely with the "Warlord" rank we already had around for quite a while.
P.S. You misspelled "E
nkidukais" in your personal text.