None of the sites or videos posted here so far disprove the main issues that have been talked about in detail in the second video titled "What happened on the moon". It goes into much further detail of what was mentioned in the first and more. Surely you couldn't have watched the video that fast, it's nearly four hours long.
It also provides two different points of view by showing interviews and answers given by NASA and other representatives. Just to give an example of a NASA representative when confronted with the evidence:
I don't really know and haven't really bothered to go and find out. And the reason is... this is 30 year old stuff...
That is against people with Ph.D and various expert backgrounds.
Here is what some others had to say:
"If some of the film was spoiled, it's remotely possible they [NASA] may have shot some scenes in a studio environment to avoid ... all embarrassment."
- David Groves, PhD.
This compelling video throws into serious doubt the authenticity of the Apollo missions and features information that challenges the declared abilities of NASA to successfully send a man to the Moon and return him safely to Earth. New evidence clearly suggests that NASA hoaxed pictures allegedly taken on the lunar surface. These findings are supported by analysis and the testimony of experts from various disciplines, including photographer/filmmaker David S. Percy ARPS and physicist David Groves PhD.
Hear what NASA has to say in response to these disturbing findings.
Some notable quotes from the first part of the video:
"The bigger the lie, the easier it is for people to believe it"
- Hitler
"Initially, it's easier to dismiss outrageous ideas, even if they are eventually proven correct, simply because we might not want to face up to uncomfortable truths and because to acknowledge that truth would make us look complete fools"
- Ronnie Stronge
If you are going to claim that your websites or "unbiased" videos disprove all the points raised in the second two-part video, then address every single major evidence raised. In fact, this "What happened on the moon" video takes into account most of what those websites "disproved" and disproves them instead by providing more evidence. Besides, nearly four hours of intricately researched subject by the experts vs theories and excuses by random people on the internet, only because NASA cannot give an answer themselves... Hmm, yea, I think I know which one is more convincing.
As the video states numerous times:
The proof is in the details.Watch it fully, especially if you're going to participate in the discussion, it's really good!
