ok so mayb there was positive comments in the first post, but other posts such as Annah\'s were uncalled for.
You are right when you say that you shudnt have to support \'ghost\' guilds, but you condemed these before they had began.If you dont want to support them you could not post,youw ent further than that though and told the guild not even to bother.
Guilds need time to develop into the true state and only time will tell if they will become successful or not.
In the case of good leadership, i cannot see how by looking at one post you could class them as bad leaders who do not devote time and effort to their guild.
Looking at your first recruitment thread i could have said the same,but you managed to progress into a good guild with good leadership.
As for what makes a good guild, i think an example was given earlier in the thread where a guild of small active and commited members would be far greater than a guild full of 100 n00bs that are active but have no community.
IMO a good and successful guild is not just about members and leadership, it is about the idear,their uniqueness and the way their guild works. The \'ghost\' guilds, if given encouragement and welcome, will be more encouraged to work to make their guild successful, you say that most wont survive,thats true,but there are those who will and they will flourish in PS, much like your guild, and the other guilds that are well known.
i agree with Davis on that point,if you let power go to your heads it will lead to downfall.
Atm no guild is better than every other guild, they all have their strengths and weaknesses. I do not see what makes BO any better than mirth.