Originally posted by Davis
Originally posted by Pogopuschel
Not entirely true. The official statement of most European governments was they didn\'t support the war without the vote of the UN, because the reasons/the right to intervene was questionable to say the least. However not every country stating so had a big majority of the population behind them. Furthermore all Europeans can\'t be seen as \"one opinion\", exactly like not all Americans can be frowned upon for the bad treatment of POWs. 
That was the official statement. France, Germany and Russia were all benefiting from the Oil for Food program, and Russia was selling stuff to Iraq. Also, they all had companies with business in Iraq. That\'s the reason they didn\'t support the US, not because they thought it was wrong.
Okay you\'re partly right, at least my government officially stated to \"not support the US in whatsoever way\", which is a stupid statement (like any unconditional statement is anyway) and they were/are still bashed by the opposition for that one

. They added the UN-part later on, basically saying they were understood wrong. Whether one can trust this is up to each individual\'s opinion (I don\'t believe that part either).
Of course every country had a few companies profiting there, like in every other country, but the importance of that is questionable.
I agree that any government always mentions only the \'noble\' reasons publically (whether they helped make the decision or not). As is probably was the case here, but I don\'t think it was because of the few companies making profits down there but more because they had no resources (money + personnel) to support another contingency of armed forces in yet another part of the world (Somalia, former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan).

There are countries with >80 million people who have but 280.000 soldiers with a constantly decreasing budget instead of a
constantly increasing one, you know.

(sry, got no English link on that).
Originally posted by Taldor
I can\'t: you have to be born in the USA to become president :-(
Actually, you just have to live here for a certain number of years.
True for any governor, but not for the president IMHO. But I think there\'s already an Act on it\'s way that changes that (at least it has been suggested) so Taldor might actually get the chance.

It seems to me like you are entirely failing to address the Oil for Food program here. Don\'t forget that this was money that was supposed to feed Iraqis, and was instead making European politicians richer.
I fail to see how politicians directly draw money from that, last time I checked that\'s not how economy works here.

Otherwise I would have become a polititian, not a damn software dev.
