Aww, Idoru, thanks for your compliments!

Datruth, thanks as well, and you're welcome.

Neither do I, but it is a possibility in the PS universe.
Why is it a possibility in PS universe? Based on what specifically?
People say they're allergic to electricity, showing many symphtomes ti allergy when they're for example in the presence of a cell phone.
People say a lot of things, and showing symptoms to allergy does not equal an allergy. Here's an official answer by James Heffley Ph.D. to the question of "Is it possible to be allergic to electricity?":
In the sense that physicians define allergy, which is acknowledged to be a narrow definition, you really cannot be allergic to electricity. A true allergy must involve the reaction of a specific molecule with Immunoglobin E to release histamine. However, if you broaden the definition to include words such as idiosyncratic response or hypersensitivity, which can make you feel just as bad, it appears there are people who are "allergic" to electricity.
The answer goes on for quite a bit with more explanation, so if you like, you can read it here:
http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A116532Hence, in a medical sense, you cannot be allergic to electricity. And even if you could be, electricity is a physical phenomenon - not a religion. So, I'm not sure how that example would even help.
When people say that they are "allergic" to religion, it is not in a biological sense. "Allergic" in this case simply means a dislike or a disbelief. Now, why should they physically and biologically suffer from anything related to any religion just because they don't believe in it or don't support it? I haven't seen any atheists in real-life burst into flames or suffer any damage after being sprayed with holy water.
How could Diaboli physically or even psychologically suffer from a "power of belief" or religion, if they didn't believe in it in the first place? Why should it affect them in any severely damaging way at all?
So, my question on
religion vs
biology still stands.
We can not explain everything
Where - in game or in real-life? You cannot explain everything in real-life because you did not create everything in real-life and nor should you have to explain. However, when you create a story, you can certainly explain at least something as major as a race's background, their god and religion, their possibilities and limitations etc.
i have a fun story, obviously jibberish but well...
The Diaboli lived in a good land once, a beautiful land with flourishing wild life and amazing views. All of this was down to their god, Gradnes. However this god insisted on sacrifces to be made, the most beautiful of all the diaboli had to be offered up to him every season.
Drenad was a happy Diaboli, his life was good, all his many friends where in exelent health, he was royalty, next to become ruler of the land and to top it all off he was engaged to marry the second most beautiful woman in the whole of the land. However, he had been sheltered from the darker side of his god by his father and his father had failed to see the imense beauty in his sons wife to be. As you can assume, two seasons passed and so her time came, and so Drenad found out. However he could not accept it, he loved her more than anything else, everything became pointless without her. So he killed his father... became king, and as king had the right to over rule any law. This had never been a problem in the past as all the Diaboli had got on well, but now he refused to see to the gods wishes. Gradnes was anything but ammused, but as Drenad was king, the people where obliged to go along with him, fight his cause, and so came the fall of the Diaboli.
Wait a minute, didn't you just say that sacrifices have never been a problem in the past "as all the Diaboli had got on well"? You didn't say that they lived in misery and were suffering due to the sacrifices demanded by Gradnes. Why would the whole race and nation suddenly take a new ruler's word, who has not even earned the trust of his people yet, over their god? You mean to tell me that they were afraid of their ruler more than their god? That they were more obliged to follow an inexperienced leader's wish than a god's wish? Unless they hated the sacrifices in the first place and waited for a leader to start some kind of a "mutiny", this doesn't sound believable at all.
Gradnes punished them, and he punished them harshly. His love for their beauty would not let his kill them all or disfigure them, but out of jealousy he cursed them so they could never worship another god, another god could never truly see their full beauty and if they even attempted it they would be severly weakend. and he destroyed their lands, he made great volcanoes rise from the ground, the rivers run red and a great cloud so they would never see the sky again. The diaboli, distrught with anger, mostly at themselves, where too ashamed to ever speak of how any of this came about again.
Gradnes punished the foolish leader, and he punished him harshly, as an example to all those who would ever dare to defy the god's wishes. A powerful demon emerged from the skies and carried Drenad to a great volcano, where his wretched body was consumed by the merciless lava.
I like stories too but seriously, for an evil god like Gradnes, it would make much more sense to punish Drenad rather than the whole race. Remove the leader and you remove the resistance. Besides, if he
is a jealous god, he'd most likely try to prevent Diaboli from worshiping another god but
not Gradnes rather than giving them up completely. And while they do worship him, he'd offer them all the protection they needed "for while his punishments are severe, his rewards are equally as great". Cursing them from any god,
including Gradnes, would imply that there is no god more powerful than Gradnes because no god could lift that curse, and if he was such a jealous and most powerful god, he'd probably try to conquer all other gods and their respective races, including Yliakum, which I'm sure he was aware of once Diaboli traveled through a portal (he's jealous, remember?). And do you really see even a shred of anything to base this theory on in the PS history?

Anyway, it's just one person's story, which is closer to a major stretch and speculation rather than a reasonable explanation, and it's certainly not part of PS history. C'mon, you already knew that.

Besides, if we are to believe that evil, hateful and jealous gods are capable of putting such curses on the races, why didn't Laanx, who couldn't convert Klyros, do the same thing to them? I'm sure someone is going to say that Laanx is "too weak" to put such a curse on a race or that "Talad would protect them".
Thanks.