I personally did not think it was serious. At the time I presumed it was rather silly by nature. Later on I presumed differently. I presumed it was nonsensical, a more silly form of silly, that is to say, closer to absurdity. Then, at another point, specifically page 18, I presumed it to be absurd. Thus, the thread had reached the level of absurdity. This is the most extreme level of absurdity, silliness and nonsensicality. Or so I presumed. My presumption of this thread's silly, or rather, nonsensical, or rather, absurd, nature, was presumptuous to say the least. By page 26, the page I write on now, it had exceeded the descriptive word absurd, and had become something beyond that. My presumption now, as it were, is that this thread has become absurd beyond absurd. Such a level of absurdity is in part, arbitrarily designated, since such a level of absurdity cannot be fully comprehended, but certainly conceived of in part. This means my assessment is, better put, a presumption. At this point in time it is unknown if this presumption is, in fact of certainty, presumptuous. It would perhaps be reasonable to presume otherwise. Such an assessment is not beyond comprehension, but conceivability, since my mind holds an opposite presumption. One's mind cannot presume two opposites at the same time, since presumptions are rather intuitive by nature.
